Defining benchmark outcomes for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: A global multicenter analysis of 1119 cases.

OBJECTIVE: Benchmarking has been proposed to reflect surgical quality and represents the highest standard reference values for desirable results. We sought to determine benchmark outcomes in patients after surgery for drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included patients who underwent MTLE surgery at 19 expert centers on five continents. Benchmarks were defined for 15 endpoints covering surgery and epilepsy outcome at discharge, 1 year after surgery, and the last available follow-up. Patients were risk-stratified by applying outcome-relevant comorbidities, and benchmarks were calculated for low-risk ("benchmark") cases. Respective measures were derived from the median value at each center, and the 75th percentile was considered the benchmark cutoff. RESULTS: A total of 1119 patients with a mean age (range) of 36.7 (1-74) years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.1 were included. Most patients (59.2%) underwent anterior temporal lobe resection with amygdalohippocampectomy. The overall rate of complications or neurological deficits was 14.4%, with no in-hospital death. After risk stratification, 377 (33.7%) benchmark cases of 1119 patients were identified, representing 13.6%-72.9% of cases per center and leaving 742 patients in the high-risk cohort. Benchmark cutoffs for any complication, clinically apparent stroke, and reoperation rate at discharge were ≤24.6%, ≤.5%, and ≤3.9%, respectively. A favorable seizure outcome (defined as International League Against Epilepsy class I and II) was reached in 83.6% at 1 year and 79.0% at the last follow-up in benchmark cases, leading to benchmark cutoffs of ≥75.2% (1-year follow-up) and ≥69.5% (mean follow-up of 39.0 months). SIGNIFICANCE: This study presents internationally applicable benchmark outcomes for the efficacy and safety of MTLE surgery. It may allow for comparison between centers, patient registries, and novel surgical and interventional techniques.

A single center experience of adjusting valve pressure ventriculoperitoneal shunts for the treatment of hydrocephalus in infants under 6 months old.

INTRODUCTION: Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) with adjustable differential pressure valves are commonly used to treat infants with hydrocephalus avoiding shunt related under- or overdrainage. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of VPS adjustable differential pressure valve on the head circumference (HC) and ventricular size (VS) stabilization in infants with post intraventricular haemorrhage, acquired and congenital hydrocephali. METHODS: Forty-three hydrocephalic infants under 6 months old were prospectively included between 2014 and 2018. All patients were treated using a VPS with adjustable differential pressure valve. HC and transfontanelle ultrasonographic VS measurements were regularly performed and pressure valve modifications were done aiming HC and VS percentiles between the 25th and 75th. The patients were divided into two groups: infants with hydrocephalus due to an intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH-H), and infants with hydrocephalus due to other aetiologies (OAE-H). RESULTS: The mean of pressure valve modification was 3.7 per patient in the IVH-H group, versus 2.95 in the OAE-H group. The median of last pressure valve value was higher at 8.5 cm H2O in the IVH-H group comparing to 5 cm H2O in the OAE-H group (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Optimal VPS pressure valve values could be extremely difficult to settle in order to gain normalisation of the HC and VS in infants. However, after long term follow up (mean of 18 months) and several pressure valve modifications, this normalisation is possible and shows that infants with IVH-H need a higher pressure valve value comparing to infants with OAE-H.

Early Epilepsy Surgery in Benign Cerebral Tumors: Avoid Your 'Low-Grade' Becoming a 'Long-Term' Epilepsy-Associated Tumor.

Epilepsy surgery in low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors (LEAT) is usually evaluated in drug-resistant cases, often meaning a time delay from diagnosis to surgery. To identify factors predicting good postoperative seizure control and neuropsychological outcome, the cohort of LEAT patients treated with resective epilepsy surgery at the Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, Germany between 2015 and 2020 was analyzed. Thirty-five patients (19 males (54.3%) and 16 females, aged 4 to 40 years (M = 18.1), mean follow-up 33 months) were included. Following surgery, 77.1% of patients remained seizure-free (Engel IA/ILAE 1). Hippocampus and amygdala resection was predictive for seizure freedom in temporal lobe epilepsy. In total, 65.7% of all patients showed cognitive deficits during presurgical workup, decreasing to 51.4% after surgery, predominantly due to significantly less impaired memory functions (p = 0.011). Patients with presurgical cognitive deficits showed a tendency toward a longer duration of epilepsy (p = 0.050). Focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (p = 0.019) and young age at onset (p = 0.018) were associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive deficits after surgery. Therefore, we advocate early epilepsy surgery without requiring proof of drug-resistance. This refers especially to lesions associated with the non-eloquent cortex.

Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model.

Background: The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and procedural factors to a minimum. Methods: To precisely compare mechanical accuracy, a stereotactic system was chosen as reference for both methods. A thin layer CT scan with an acrylic phantom fixed to the frame and a localizer enabling the software to recognize the coordinate system was performed. For each of the five phantom targets, two different trajectories were planned, resulting in 10 trajectories. A series of five repetitions was performed, each time based on a new CT scan. Hence, 50 trajectories were analyzed for each method. X-rays of the final cannula position were fused with the planning data. The coordinates of the target point and the endpoint of the robot- or frame-guided probe were visually determined using the robotic software. The target point error (TPE) was calculated applying the Euclidian distance. The depth deviation along the trajectory and the lateral deviation were separately calculated. Results: Robotics was significantly more accurate, with an arithmetic TPE mean of 0.53 mm (95% CI 0.41-0.55 mm) compared to 0.72 mm (95% CI 0.63-0.8 mm) in stereotaxy (p < 0.05). In robotics, the mean depth deviation along the trajectory was -0.22 mm (95% CI -0.25 to -0.14 mm). The mean lateral deviation was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.32-0.49 mm). In frame-based stereotaxy, the mean depth deviation amounted to -0.20 mm (95% CI -0.26 to -0.14 mm), the mean lateral deviation to 0.65 mm (95% CI 0.55-0.74 mm). Conclusion: Both the robotic and frame-based approach proved accurate. The robotic procedure showed significantly higher accuracy. For both methods, procedural factors occurring during surgery might have a more relevant impact on overall accuracy.

Enhancing Safety in Epilepsy Surgery (EASINESS): Study Protocol for a Retrospective, Multicenter, Open Registry.

Introduction: Optimizing patient safety and quality improvement is increasingly important in surgery. Benchmarks and clinical quality registries are being developed to assess the best achievable results for several surgical procedures and reduce unwarranted variation between different centers. However, there is no clinical database from international centers for establishing standardized reference values of patients undergoing surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Design: The Enhancing Safety in Epilepsy Surgery (EASINESS) study is a retrospectively conducted, multicenter, open registry. All patients undergoing mesial temporal lobe epilepsy surgery in participating centers between January 2015 and December 2019 are included in this study. The patient characteristics, preoperative diagnostic tools, surgical data, postoperative complications, and long-term seizure outcomes are recorded. Outcomes: The collected data will be used for establishing standardized reference values ("benchmarks") for this type of surgical procedure. The primary endpoints include seizure outcomes according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification and defined postoperative complications. Discussion: The EASINESS will define robust and standardized outcome references after amygdalohippocampectomy for temporal lobe epilepsy. After the successful definition of benchmarks from an international cohort of renowned centers, these data will serve as reference values for the evaluation of novel surgical techniques and comparisons among centers for future clinical trials. Clinical trial registration: This study is indexed at clinicaltrials.gov (NT 04952298).

Comparison of frame-less robotic versus frame-based stereotactic biopsy of intracranial lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Robotic guidance might be an alternative to classic stereotaxy for biopsies of intracranial lesions. Both methods were compared regarding time efficacy, histopathological results and complications. METHODS: A retrospective analysis enrolling all patients undergoing robotic- or stereotactic biopsies between 01/2015 and 12/2018 was conducted. Trajectory planning was performed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). With the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA), patient registration was accomplished using a facial laser scan in the operating room (OR), immediately followed by biopsy. In stereotaxy, patients were transported to the CT for Leksell Frame registration, followed by biopsy in the OR. RESULTS: The average overall procedure time amounted in robotics to 169 min and in stereotaxy to 179 min (p = 0.005). The difference was greatest for temporal targets, amounting in robotics to 161 min and in stereotaxy to 188 min (p = 0,0007). However, the average time spent purely in the OR amounted in robotics to 140 min and in stereotaxy to 113 min (p < 0.001). In 150 robotic biopsies, diagnostic yield amounted to 98%, in 266 stereotactic biopsies to 91%. Symptomatic postoperative hemorrhages were observed in 3 patients (2%) in robotic biopsy and 7 patients (2,7%) in stereotactic biopsy. CONCLUSION: Robotics showed a shorter overall procedure time as there is no need for a transport to the CT whereas the pure OR time was shorter in stereotaxy due to skipping the laser registration process. Diagnostic yield was higher in robotics, most likely due to case selection, complication rates were equal.

Postoperative outcomes and surgical ratio at a newly established epilepsy center: The first 100 procedures.

PURPOSE: To describe the patients' characteristics, surgical ratio, and outcomes following epilepsy surgery at the newly established Epilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the first 100 consecutive patients, including adult (n = 77) and pediatric (n = 23) patients, with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent resective or ablative surgical procedures at a single, newly established epilepsy center. Patient characteristics, seizure and neuropsychological outcomes, histopathology, complications, and surgical ratio were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 28.8 years (children 10.6 years, adults 34.2 years). The mean epilepsy duration was 11.9 years (children 3.9 years, adults 14.3 years), and the mean follow-up was 1.5 years. At the most recent visit, 64% of patients remained completely seizure free [Engel IA]. The rates of perioperative complications and unexpected new neurological deficits were 5%, each. The proportion of patients showing deficits in one or more cognitive domains increased six months after surgery and decreased to presurgical proportions after two years. Symptoms of depression were significantly decreased and quality of life was significantly increased after surgery. The surgical ratio was 25.3%. CONCLUSION: Similar postsurgical outcomes were achieved at a newly established epilepsy center compared with long-standing epilepsy centers. The lower time to surgery may reflect a general decrease in time to surgery over the last decade or the improved accessibility of a new epilepsy center in a previously underserved area. The surgical ratio was not lower than reported for established centers.

Early and Late Postoperative Seizures in Meningioma Patients and Prediction by a Recent Scoring System.

Seizures are among the most common symptoms of meningioma. This retrospective study sought to identify risk factors for early and late seizures in meningioma patients and to evaluate a modified STAMPE2 score. In 556 patients who underwent meningioma surgery, we correlated different risk factors with the occurrence of postoperative seizures. A modified STAMPE2 score was applied. Risk factors for preoperative seizures were edema (p = 0.039) and temporal location (p = 0.038). For postoperative seizures preoperative tumor size (p < 0.001), sensomotory deficit (p = 0.004) and sphenoid wing location (p = 0.032) were independent risk factors. In terms of postoperative status epilepticus; sphenoid wing location (p = 0.022), tumor volume (p = 0.045) and preoperative seizures (p < 0.001) were independent risk factors. Postoperative seizures lead to a KPS deterioration and thus an impaired quality of life (p < 0.001). Late seizures occurred in 43% of patients with postoperative seizures. The small sub-cohort of patients (2.7%) with a STAMPE2 score of more than six points had a significantly increased risk for seizures (p < 0.001, total risk 70%). We concluded that besides distinct risk factors, high scores of the modified STAMPE2 score could estimate the risk of postoperative seizures. However, it seems not transferable to our cohort.

Thromboembolic infarction caused by an unknown patent foramen ovale 30 years after VA shunt insertion: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoatrial shunt (VA) insertion is one of the possible surgical procedures to treat hydrocephalus. However, it is also associated with several complications such as obstruction and shunt infection as well as life-threatening complications like intraatrial thrombus or thrombosis on the distal catheter. In this case report, we share a rare case of a patient with a VA shunt, who was admitted to our hospital with a stroke. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 56-year-old female patient with suspected acute stroke was admitted to the stroke unit. CT and MRI scans showed multiple cerebral infarctions in both hemispheres. The transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed at the tip of the VA shunt catheter, which was implanted about 30 years ago due to aqueduct stenosis, also a thrombotic formation as the reason of stroke. Interestingly, the tip of the catheter was not in the right atrium as expected, but in the left atrium. Further evaluation showed a patent foramen ovale (PFO), through which the catheter migrated from the right to the left side. At first, conservative treatment with anticoagulation was started with the aim to dissolve the thrombotic formation; however, a control TEE showed an unchanged mass at the catheter tip. Therefore, a ventriculoperitoneal shunt was implanted and the proximal shunt catheter was removed with an additional closure of the PFO by our heart surgeons. Postoperatively, the patient was discharged 10 days later in good condition to a rehabilitation center. CONCLUSIONS: Thromboembolic events due to a PFO are rare but possible life-threatening complication after VA shunt insertion. Therefore, preoperative cardiac diagnostic might be clinically relevant prior to a VA shunt implantation to avoid such complications.

Invasive EEG-electrodes in presurgical evaluation of epilepsies: Systematic analysis of implantation-, video-EEG-monitoring- and explantation-related complications, and review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: Stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) is a diagnostic procedure for patients with refractory focal epilepsies that is performed to localize and define the epileptogenic zone. In contrast to grid electrodes, sEEG electrodes are implanted using minimal invasive operation techniques without large craniotomies. Previous studies provided good evidence that sEEG implantation is a safe and effective procedure; however, complications in asymptomatic patients after explantation may be underreported. The aim of this analysis was to systematically analyze clinical and imaging data following implantation and explantation. RESULTS: We analyzed 18 consecutive patients (mean age: 30.5 years, range: 12-46; 61% female) undergoing invasive presurgical video-EEG monitoring via sEEG electrodes (n = 167 implanted electrodes) over a period of 2.5 years with robot-assisted implantation. There were no neurological deficits reported after implantation or explantation in any of the enrolled patients. Postimplantation imaging showed a minimal subclinical subarachnoid hemorrhage in one patient and further workup revealed a previously unknown factor VII deficiency. No injuries or status epilepticus occurred during video-EEG monitoring. In one patient, a seizure-related asymptomatic cross break of two fixation screws was found and led to revision surgery. Unspecific symptoms like headaches or low-grade fever were present in 10 of 18 (56%) patients during the first days of video-EEG monitoring and were transient. Postexplantation imaging showed asymptomatic and small bleedings close to four electrodes (2.8%). CONCLUSION: Overall, sEEG is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. Systematic imaging after implantation and explantation helps to identify clinically silent complications of sEEG. In the literature, complication rates of up to 4.4% in sEEG and in 49.9% of subdural EEG are reported; however, systematic imaging after explantation was not performed throughout the studies, which may have led to underreporting of associated complications.

Electrode placement accuracy in robot-assisted epilepsy surgery: A comparison of different referencing techniques including frame-based CT versus facial laser scan based on CT or MRI.

BACKGROUND: Precise robotic or stereotactic implantation of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) electrodes relies on the exact referencing of the planning images in order to match the patient's anatomy to the stereotactic device or robot. We compared the accuracy of sEEG electrode implantation with stereotactic frame versus laser scanning of the face based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for referencing. METHODS: The accuracy was determined by calculating the Euclidian distance between the planned trajectory and the postoperative position of the sEEG electrode, defining the entry point error (EPE) and the target point error (TPE). The sEEG electrodes (n = 171) were implanted with the robotic surgery assistant (ROSA) in 19 patients. Preoperative trajectory planning was performed on three-dimensional (3D) MRI datasets. Referencing was accomplished either by performing (A) 1.25-mm slice CT with the patient's head fixed in a Leksell stereotactic frame (CT-frame, n = 49), fused with a 3D-T1-weighted, contrast enhanced- and T2-weighted 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI; (B) 1.25 mm CT (CT-laser, n = 60), fused with 3D-3.0-T MRI; (C) 3.0-T MRI T1-based laser scan (3.0-T MRI-laser, n = 56) or (D) in one single patient, because of a pacemaker, 3D-1.5-T MRI T1-based laser scan (1.5-T MRI-laser, n = 6). RESULTS: In (A) CT-frame referencing, the mean EPE amounted to 0.86 mm and the mean TPE amounted to 2.28 mm (n = 49). In (B) CT-laser referencing, the EPE amounted to 1.85 mm and the TPE to 2.41 mm (n = 60). In (C) 3.0-T MRI-laser referencing, the mean EPE amounted to 3.02 mm and the mean TPE to 3.51 mm (n = 56). In (D) 1.5-T MRI, surprisingly the mean EPE amounted only to 0.97 mm and the TPE to 1.71 mm (n = 6). In 3 cases using CT-laser and 1 case using 3.0 T MRI-laser for referencing, small asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages were detected. No further complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Robot-guided sEEG electrode implantation using CT-frame referencing and CT-laser-based referencing is most accurate and can serve for high precision placement of electrodes. In contrast, 3.0-T MRI-laser-based referencing is less accurate, but saves radiation. Most trajectories can be reached if alternative routes over less vascularized brain areas are used. This article is part of the Special Issue "Individualized Epilepsy Management: Medicines, Surgery and Beyond".

Robot-guided stereoelectroencephalography without a computed tomography scan for referencing: Analysis of accuracy.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies with robot-guided stereotaxy use computed tomography (CT) scans for referencing. We will provide evidence that using preoperative MRI datasets referenced with a laser scan of the patient's face is sufficient for sEEG implantation. METHODS: In total, 40 sEEG electrodes were implanted in five patients by the robotic surgical assistant (ROSA). The postoperative CT scan for identifying electrode positions was fused with the preoperative MRI-based planning data. The accuracy was determined by the target point error (TPE) and the entry point error (EPE), applying the Euclidean distance. RESULTS: The mean TPE amounted to 2.96 mm, the mean EPE to 2.53 mm. The accuracy was improved in 1.5 T MRI: the mean TPE amounted to 1.72 mm, the EPE to 0.97 mm. No complications, haemorrhages, infections, etc., were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Robot-guided sEEG based on 3 T MRI reduces radiation exposure for the patient and can still be performed safely.

Biopsies of pediatric brainstem lesions display low morbidity but strong impact on further treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVE: The course of malignant brain stem gliomas in childhood is rarely positive. Because of limited therapeutic options and potentially hazardous biopsies oncologist often relay on MRI diagnoses only for further therapy decisions. In this study we show that brain stem biopsies display a low morbidity rate and neuropathological assessment has a considerable impact on further treatment decision. METHODS: Within 18-months five children with brainstem symptoms and the radiological diagnosis of a malignant brainstem glioma, were identified. From this time point it was possible to analyze all samples with the 450K methylome analysis. Other neuropathological techniques included classical histology with immunohistochemistry. Surgery was performed as biopsy, either microsurgical, frame-guided (Leksell), robot-assisted (ROSA) or navigated (BrainLab, two children). RESULTS: Mean age of the children was 7.5years (range: newborn to 12years). There was no biopsy-related morbidity or mortality. The mean number of taken samples was 12 (range: 1-25). Histologic diagnosis could be established in all children, however, 450K methylome diagnosis was positive in only two out of five patients. CONCLUSION: Despite the technically difficult biopsies, all specimens were sufficient for immunohistochemical diagnosis, however, 450K methylome analysis could only be better established where multiple small samples were taken, instead of few larger ones. Based on the preoperative radiological diagnosis suggesting malignant brainstem glioma, all children would have been treated with combined radiation and temozolomid chemotherapy. Nevertheless, due to the availability of histology and molecular diagnostics, individualized therapy could be performed, preventing in two out of five children from unnecessary radiation and chemotherapy.

Regional Spinal Cord Atrophy Is Associated with Poor Outcome After Surgery on Intramedullary Spinal Cord Ependymoma: A New Aspect of Delayed Neurological Deterioration.

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients suffer delayed neurologic deficits, even after a successful removal of intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma. The underlying pathology remains unknown. Radiologic findings could provide an explanation for poor outcome after surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all cases treated from 1980 to 2016 in our department. The cohort included all patients with intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma treated with microsurgical excision. The cross-sectional area of the spinal cord at the level of the former performed surgery was compared using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), follow-up MRI, adjacent unaffected levels, and the control group. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients with an intramedullary spinal cord lesion were treated in this period. Ependymoma was the predominant tumor (n = 28) followed by intramedullary gliomas and vascular lesions. Mean age (±SD) was 48.2 ± 10.5 years with a female predominance (16 women, 12 men). An unfavorable outcome was observed in 53% of the patients after an initially uneventful postoperative course. The follow-up cross-sectional area of the spinal cord was significantly reduced in these patients compared to adjacent unoperated levels and the control group. Sagittal and axial spinal MRI showed spinal cord narrowing owing to atrophic changes in the area of the performed surgery in 53% of patients with resected ependymoma after a mean follow-up time of 9 years. Functional outcome in ependymoma was significantly associated with spinal cord atrophy (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord atrophy seems to be a predicting factor in long-term outcome after surgical removal of intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma.