Efficacy and safety of sibutramine for weight loss in obese patients with hypertension well controlled by beta-adrenergic blocking agents: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised trial.

Sibutramine is a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor that is effective for long-term weight reduction and maintenance in obese patients when used as an adjunct to dietary and behavioural measures. Because the inhibition of noradrenaline reuptake may be expected to increase systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and pulse rate (PR), a 12-week multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sibutramine for weight loss in obese patients whose hypertension was well controlled (DBP < or = 95 mm Hg) by beta-adrenergic blocking agents (beta-blockers), with or without concomitant thiazide diuretics. Of the 61 patients randomised to sibutramine 20 mg once daily or placebo, 55 patients (90%) completed the study. After 12 weeks, sibutramine-treated patients lost significantly more weight than placebo-treated patients: mean weight reductions were 4.2 kg (4.5%) in the sibutramine group vs 0.3 kg (0.4%) in the placebo group (P<0.001). Greater weight reduction on sibutramine was accompanied by trends for greater mean reductions in serum triglycerides and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Sibutramine was well tolerated, and most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. No sibutramine patient discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. Mean supine and standing DBP and SBP were not statistically significantly different between the sibutramine group and the placebo group at any post-baseline visit during the 12-week trial. At week 12, mean increases from baseline supine SBP and DBP, respectively, were 1.6 and 1.7 mm Hg for the sibutramine group vs increases of 0.4 and 1.3 mm Hg for the placebo group. At week 12, mean increases from baseline standing SBP and DBP, respectively, were 1.5 and 1.8 mm Hg for the sibutramine group vs an increase of 0.3 and a decrease of 0.8 mm Hg for the placebo group (P > 0.05 for treatment comparison). A statistically significant mean increase of 5.6 bpm (+/-8.25, s.d.) in supine PR from a baseline of 62 bpm was reported in sibutramine-treated patients at week 12, whereas placebo-treated patients had a mean supine PR decrease of 2.2 bpm (+/-6.43) (P < 0.001). In summary, sibutramine was well tolerated and effective in weight reduction. The addition of sibutramine did not result in an increase in BP in obese patients whose hypertension was well controlled by a beta-blocker. However, based on the potential for changes in BP and PR, obese patients being treated with sibutramine should be monitored periodically for changes in BP and PR and managed appropriately.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of rivastigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Rivastigmine is a cholinersterase inhibitor approved recently for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objective of this study is to characterize the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of rivastigmine in patients with AD. Eighteen AD patients received doses ranging from 1 to 6 mg bid for about 11 weeks. Rivastigmine and its active (major) metabolite (ZNS 114-666, also called NAP 226-90), plasma, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations were determined together with the AChE activity and computerized neuropsychological test battery (CNTB) scores. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data was conducted using NONMEM. Rivastigmine and its metabolite exhibited dose-disproportional pharmacokinetics. The apparent clearance and volume of distribution (plasma) of rivastigmine were estimated to be 120 L/h and 236 L, respectively. The relative bioavailability at the 6 mg dose was about 140%. The metabolite had a clearance of about 100 L/h and a volume of distribution of 256 L. The kinetics of the parent and metabolite in CSF showed an equilibration half-life of about 0.2 and 0.5 hours, respectively. The metabolite levels in CSF correlated very well with the acetylcholinesterase inhibition, with a ZNS 114-666 concentration of about 5.4 microg/L required for half-maximal inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity. No statistically significant correlation of the CNTB scores with enzyme inhibition, parent or metabolite concentration (plasma/CSF), or rivastigmine dose could be established. The PK-PD model presented in this study can provide valuable information to optimize the drug development of rivastigmine and other related compounds and also in rationalizing dosing recommendations.

The status of ongoing trials for mild cognitive impairment.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a term used to describe memory decline or other specific cognitive impairment in individuals who do not have dementia or significant impairment of other cognitive functions beyond that expected for their age or education. It has been suggested that as much as 38% of the elderly population would meet criteria for MCI and although the associated memory deficits are mild, the fact that up to 15% of MCI patients, particularly those with a particular type of memory impairment, convert to Alzheimer's disease (AD) annually has prompted serious attention. Despite the high conversion rate, MCI cannot be used synonymously with early or mild AD, as patients with AD are impaired not only in memory performance but in other cognitive domains as well; they meet diagnostic criteria for dementia. However, since there is a high conversion rate from MCI to AD, it is likely many with MCI have the underlying neuropathology of AD, though they do not yet meet clinical diagnostic criteria. Therefore, treatment strategies developed for AD, specifically acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and Cox-2 inhibitors, have been among the first employed to treat MCI. It is hoped that by impeding the progression of MCI in this manner, fewer patients will convert to AD. This article will give a brief overview of the condition of mild cognitive impairment and an account of trial methodology and current treatment strategies being employed for MCI.

Review of the next generation of Alzheimer's disease therapeutics: challenges for drug development.

1. AD is believed to stem from dysfunctional cholinergic signaling in the regions of the brain associated with memory and cognition. 2. The occurrence of AD in afflicted individuals correlates with an increase in the accumulation of A beta-rich senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. 3. Currently, the only FDA-approved AD therapies are a group of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors which slow the turnover of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the synapse. 4. Many other compounds which target other aspects of the disease, such as reducing neuronal damage and limiting oxidation, are in clinical trials. These include monoamine oxidase (MAO-B) inhibitors, NSAIDs, antioxidants and estrogen, among others. 5. Recent research discoveries have more completely defined the molecular nature of AD, and are generating new approaches for treatment. One idea is to limit the ability of the protein tau to become phosphorylated in hopes that this will limit the formation of neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. 6. A separate approach that is being pursued is to prevent formation and accumulation of A beta plaques. This may be accomplished by either regulating gamma-secretase activity, or using anti-beta-amyloid antibodies to reduce the size of existing plaques. 7. Employing improved procedural and technological approaches during clinical trials, such as bridging studies, dynabridge studies and PET analysis, promises to streamline the drug development process. 8. The use of biomarkers and MRI analysis may be an effective means by which to identify the disease early. Consequently, early intervention treatment therapies may be an effective way of delaying onset of the disease. 9. Long term AD studies, particularly those focusing on the MCI population, are likely to provide statistically valid results using a smaller study population.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of buspirone during oral administration to children and adolescents with anxiety disorder and normal healthy adults.

A 21-day, open-label, multisite, dose escalation study comprising three demographic groups (children, adolescents, and adults) was performed to determine the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of orally administered buspirone. Thirteen children and 12 adolescents with anxiety disorder and 14 normal healthy adults were escalated from 5 to 30 mg buspirone bid over the 3-week study. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that buspirone was rapidly absorbed in all study groups, reaching peak levels at about 1 hour after administration. Peak plasma buspirone concentrations (Cmax) were highest in children and lowest in adults at all three dose levels (7.5, 15, 30 mg bid). However, 1-pyrimidinylpiperazine (1-PP), the primary metabolite of buspirone, exhibited a different plasma concentration-time profile; Cmax was significantly higher in children than in either adolescents or adults at all concentrations. In addition, TAUC0-T for 1-PP was significantly higher in the children cohort relative to adolescents and adults. Buspirone was generally safe and well tolerated at doses up to 30 mg bid in adolescents and adults and most of the children. The most frequently reported adverse events in children and adolescents were lightheadedness (68%), headache (48%), and dyspepsia (20%); 2 children withdrewfrom the study at the higher doses (15 mg and 30 mg bid) due to adverse effects. In adults, the most common adverse effect was somnolence (21.4%); lightheadedness, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were also reported, although these were mild in intensity.

Ongoing trials in Alzheimer's disease.

Researchers have sought to understand the underlying pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) ever since Dr A Alzheimer first described the condition in 1907. Unfortunately however, until recently, they have done so with limited success. This lack of clarity has deterred advancements in therapeutic drug research beyond all but the purely symptomatic treatment relief currently available. However, through spatio-temporal analysis of the two types of cerebral lesions that characterise the disorder (senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles) and the compilation of genetic data concerning familial AD, there now exists the foundation for a more comprehensive understanding of the disease. Although symptomatic cholinergic strategies have beneficial effects, their benefits are modest and current research has turned to the development of other promising strategies, including oestrogen replacement, anti-inflammatory agents, free radical scavengers, anti-oxidants and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors. Many of these strategies may have some merit, however further analysis and structured research are necessary before a definitive decision can be made about their efficacy and possible role in AD therapy. Strategies that are directed at halting the underlying biochemical changes in AD are nearing clinical testing and offer the promise for meaningful therapeutic outcomes.

Review of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor galanthamine.

Galanthamine (or galantamine, Reminyl) is a tertiary alkaloid acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI) which has been approved in several countries for the symptomatic treatment of senile dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Derived from bulbs of the common snowdrop and several Amaryllidaceae plants, (-)-galanthamine (GAL) has long been used in anaesthetics to reverse neuromuscular paralysis induced by turbocurarine-like muscle relaxants and more recently, has been shown to attenuate drug- and lesion-induced cognitive deficits in animal models of learning and memory. GAL directly inhibits acetylcholinesterase activity, while demonstrating much weaker activity on butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE). GAL also stimulates pre- and postsynaptic nicotinic receptors, although the clinical significance of this finding is yet unclear. Numerous variants and analogues of GAL have also been developed, with varying potency in inhibiting AChE activity. GAL is readily absorbed after oral administration, with a t(max) of 52 min and a plasma elimination t(1/2) of 5.7 h. The efficacy of GAL administered to Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients has been well demonstrated by large-scale clinical trials. Typical of AChEIs, the most common adverse events associated with GAL are nausea and vomiting. In conclusion, evidence to date suggests galanthamine to be similar to other AChEIs in improving cognitive function in AD patients.

Mild cognitive impairment: emerging therapeutics.

OBJECTIVE: To present a general overview of the etiology, definition, and prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as well as outline possible treatment strategies. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was conducted for relevant references generated from 1990 to 2000 concerning MCI, mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (AD), and therapeutic strategies. Several books were also used in the compilation of data for this review, as well as the authors' experience in designing and conducting MCI trials. DATA EXTRACTION: All of the references listed were assessed, and all relevant information was included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Forgetful individuals most likely to develop AD have a condition known as MCI previous to their development of dementia. This condition is hallmarked by memory impairment that is abnormal for the individual's age and educational level. While not all individuals with MCI develop AD, it is apparent that the condition can serve as a potential marker for early onset of AD. CONCLUSIONS: As many clinicians can attest, occasional forgetfulness is a common aspect of the aging process. Eventually, however, a large portion of forgetful individuals, especially those with MCI, will be diagnosed with AD or some other form of dementia. Indeed, many researchers have suggested that MCI should be regarded as incipient AD and that these individuals would benefit from drug therapy. Thus, MCI screening may be beneficial in terms of both early AD intervention and perhaps even AD prevention.

Gender differences in depression and antidepressant pharmacokinetics and adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: To review data generated by studies examining gender differences in the prevalence of depression, as well as in antidepressant pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and adverse events. DATA SOURCES: Published articles and abstracts were identified through MEDLINE (January 1966-April 1999) using the following search terms: antidepressant, response, gender, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, female, side effect, and adverse events. All articles that assessed gender differences in antidepressant response, pharmacokinetics, and adverse events, as well as articles that evaluated postulated mechanisms for these differences, were reviewed. Additional articles were identified from bibliographies of retrieved articles. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All relevant abstracts, studies, and review articles were evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Gender differences in the prevalence of depression have been reported and may result from the interaction of several factors. Women have been shown to have a higher incidence of depression, which may be due to artifact, social, or biologic reasons. Studies suggest that the pharmacokinetic disposition of popular antidepressants varies between men and women, and women taking antidepressants may exhibit a different adverse event profile. Only one study specifically evaluated gender differences in antidepressant treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: Further research elucidating gender differences in response to antidepressant treatment and on depression prevalence is needed. Some studies report that the pharmacokinetics of antidepressants may vary between men and women. Therefore, clinicians should be aware that potential differences in antidepressant pharmacokinetics may exist, and a dosage adjustment may be necessary for women to ensure a favorable drug response, compliance, and decreased incidence of adverse events.

RBC cholinesterase inhibition: a useful surrogate marker for cholinesterase inhibitor activity in Alzheimer disease therapy?

Red blood cell (RBC) acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition has been used as a peripheral surrogate marker for the activity of centrally acting AChE inhibitors (AChEIs) in the treatment of Alzheimer disease. As a valid peripheral surrogate marker, RBC AChE inhibition should reflect the central pharmacodynamic activity of the compound and should demonstrate a relation with cognitive or global improvement in patients with Alzheimer disease. As a useful clinical tool, RBC AChE inhibition should also provide an advantage in dose optimization. However, the application of surrogate markers in research and clinical use is controversial (Prentice, 1989; Gotzsche, 1996; Colburn, 1997; De Gruttola et al., 1997). For instance, surrogate markers that have been identified or applied inappropriately can lead to erroneous conclusions, slowing the drug development process (Colburn, 1997). Also, the validation of surrogate markers for the pharmacodynamic activity of central nervous system drugs is not always possible because samples of brain tissue cannot be analyzed in humans. Finally, although validation of peripheral markers for central nervous system drugs has been approached via analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (Cutler et al., 1998a), few markers have been subjected to such rigorous evaluation in clinical studies. The extent to which measures of peripheral AChE inhibition accurately model central drug activity and therapeutic effectiveness of AChEIs, both as individual agents and as a drug class, is the focus of this review. AChEIs comprise a group of structurally diverse compounds with a wide range of relative specificities for the various molecular species of cholinesterase found in plasma, RBCs, and the brain. Studies of RBC AChE inhibition after administration of AChEIs in animals are of limited utility because of the differential sensitivity of AChEIs for human versus animal forms of AChE, the poor correlation between effective doses in animals and humans, and the lack of standardized measurements of effectiveness. Although clinical studies of donepezil, metrifonate, and eptastigmine have suggested the potential use of RBC AChE inhibition as a predictor of clinical response, the degree of inhibition yielding maximum cognitive improvements was highly variable from compound to compound (30-80%). Further, investigators did not prove a relation between central and peripheral pharmacodynamics or demonstrate an advantage over dose in the ability of RBC AChE inhibition to predict clinical response. A study of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer disease revealed that cerebrospinal fluid AChE inhibition correlated well with cognitive performance, whereas peripheral inhibition did not. Therefore, RBC cholinesterase inhibition is not a reliable surrogate marker for the activity of AChEIs as a class of drugs, and its usefulness as a dose optimization tool for individual agents has yet to be demonstrated clearly.

Recent developments in the drug treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder with an impact on public health which continues to increase with the increasing longevity of the population. The disease is characterised clinically by a progressive loss of cognitive and behavioural function. These deficits are thought to result from decreased cholinergic transmission; therefore, restoring cholinergic function has been the main focus in the development of drugs for AD. Several pharmacological approaches to enhancing cholinergic function have been developed for symptomatic or palliative therapy of AD. Although these strategies have resulted in modest cognitive and behavioural improvements in patients with AD, they do not address the underlying progression of the disease. New strategies will be required to slow, stop or reverse the effects of neurodegeneration in AD. A number of potential therapies are currently under investigation, including estrogen replacement, anti-inflammatory agents, free radical scavengers and antioxidants, and monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors. The evidence for a protective effect of estrogens or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is controversial, and largely based on retrospective studies. More controlled prospective studies are needed to definitively demonstrate the benefits of long term estrogen or NSAID use in the prevention of AD. Free radical scavengers/antioxidants such as idebenone, and selective prevention MAO-B inhibitors such as lazabemide are well tolerated, but require additional studies in order to demonstrate preventative effects. In addition, other approaches, such as anti-amyloid treatments that affect beta-amylase secretion, aggregation and toxicity, appear promising; treatments that hinder neurofibrillary tangle construction and nerve growth factor (NGF) induction are in the very early stages of development.

Meta-analysis of the safety and tolerability of two dose regimens of buspirone in patients with persistent anxiety.

Buspirone is an azapirone with 5-HT1A partial agonist activity which has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, commonly referred to as persistent anxiety. In this meta-analysis report, safety results from two studies comparing buspirone 15 mg twice daily (BID) with buspirone 10 mg three times daily (TID) in patients with persistent anxiety are presented. In the study protocols, qualified patients completed a 7-day placebo lead-in phase and were randomized to receive buspirone 30 mg per day, as either a BID or TID regimen, for 6-8 weeks. A total of 289 patients received buspirone 15 mg BID (n = 144) or 10 mg TID (n = 145) at 15 sites. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the two treatment groups, except for a significantly greater incidence of palpitations in patients receiving buspirone BID (5%) compared to buspirone TID (1%). The most frequently reported adverse events for both buspirone BID- and TID-treated patients were dizziness, headache, and nausea. No appreciable differences between treatments were observed for vital signs, physical exam, ECG, or clinical laboratory results. A change to BID dosing for buspirone may offer convenience and possibly higher compliance in patients with persistent anxiety without compromising the excellent safety and tolerability profile of the medication.

Cholinesterase inhibitors: a therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer disease.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a review of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) tested as therapeutic agents for Alzheimer disease (AD). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches (January 1986-July 1998) identified pertinent literature. Selected references from these articles, as well as abstracts from recent meetings and package insert literature from approved compounds, were also used as source material. DATA EXTRACTION: AChEIs were reviewed with regard to chemical structure, mechanism of inhibition, substrate specificity, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, safety/tolerability, and efficacy. DATA SYNTHESIS: Cholinergic deficits, leading to cognitive impairment, are a significant aspect of neurodegeneration in AD. AChEIs reduce the degradation of acetylcholine, thus enhancing cholinergic transmission. In addition to the two agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration, tacrine and donepezil, six other compounds of diverse chemical structure and mechanism of inhibition including physostigmine, metrifonate, rivastigmine, and galantamine are under investigation as potential therapy for AD. These compounds are structurally diverse, possess unique patterns of specificities for the various forms of cholinesterase enzymes, use distinct mechanisms of enzyme inhibition, present unique adverse event profiles, and offer relatively similar mean gains in cognitive abilities to patients with AD in controlled clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to placebo, new AChEIs in development provide modest improvements in cognition for patients with mild to moderate AD, with improved tolerability profiles and more convenient dosing relative to tacrine. The availability of a wide array of AChEIs soon to be accessible to patients with AD will provide additional options to those who cannot tolerate or do not respond to drugs currently used for AD.

A double-blind, randomized, crossover assessment of blood pressure following administration of avitriptan, sumatriptan, or placebo to patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

We examined the effects of avitriptan, a 5-hydroxytryptamine 1-like (5HT1) receptor agonist for the treatment of migraine, in patients with medicated, controlled, mild to moderate hypertension relative to placebo and sumatriptan. The study was randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and 4-way crossover in design. Twenty patients (12M, 8F) participated. As required by protocol, all were stable on medications for mild to moderate hypertension, with a supine diastolic blood pressure of < 95 mmHg. Qualified subjects were randomized to receive oral administration of either 75 or 150 mg of avitriptan, 100 mg sumatriptan or placebo during the four treatment visits. Supine blood pressure and pulse rates were recorded up to 24 h after drug administration. Avitriptan 150 mg significantly increased peak diastolic and systolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure compared to placebo and sumatriptan 100 mg (p < 0.05). Only those hypertensive patients receiving medication for hypertension should receive anti-migraine medications, such as avitriptan, which are 5HT1-like receptor agonists.

NXX-066 in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a bridging study.

Reduced cholinergic transmission is a key neurotransmitter dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). NXX-066, a physostigmine analog and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, has demonstrated activity in animal models of memory function, and was well tolerated in healthy subjects up to a single dose of 64 mg and multiple doses of 60 mg QD for seven days. Since AChE inhibitors are often tolerated differently in AD patients than in healthy volunteers, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, single-center, inpatient bridging study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of NXX-066 in the target patient population. Seven consecutive panels of eight AD patients each (6 active, 2 placebo) received fixed oral doses of NXX-066 (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or 80 mg BID) for seven days. Initiation of each subsequent panel (dose group) was contingent upon the tolerability of lower dose levels. The MTD was determined to be 70 mg BID when four of six patients receiving 80 mg BID were prematurely discontinued from the study due to nausea and/or vomiting, accompanied in some patients by mild to moderate dizziness, headache, asthenia, and gastric symptoms. Wide variability in plasma levels of NXX-066 was observed in all dose panels. AChE inhibition in whole blood correlated with both maximum plasma concentration and dose; however, AChE inhibition was not predictive of adverse events. In this study, AD patients tolerated larger daily doses of NXX-066 on a BID regimen than healthy normal subjects had tolerated with QD dosing. Further studies are warranted to examine whether differing tolerability between patients and healthy subjects or the reduced dosing interval explains these findings.

Exploratory studies: implications for drug development in Alzheimer's disease.

The process of drug development involves cycles of learning and confirming. In the learning phase of the cycle, data from studies are used to generate hypotheses; later studies are designed specifically to confirm these hypotheses. There is a growing realization that exploratory studies early in drug development are critical for the design of large confimatory clinical trials. For example, patients often differ from healthy volunteers in their tolerance of CNS compounds, so investigators should determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in the patient population though a "bridging study" prior to designing Phase II efficacy trials. By performing well-controlled safety/tolerability studies with a small number of patients on an inpatient basis, researchers can avoid exposing large numbers of study participants to the wrong dose. Bridging studies also provide information on the approximate frequencies of various types of adverse events, which is very helpful in designing outpatient trials to confirm the safety profile. A second type of exploratory study, a "dynabridge study", is an early pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study in patients to measure drug concentrations and activities in the central compartment (assessed by sampling the CSF). Dynabridge studies can be used to optimize the dosing regimen, to confirm that the drug is affecting the targeted receptor, and to measure correlations between drug activity and proposed surrogate markers.

Distinct mechanism for antidepressant activity by blockade of central substance P receptors.

The localization of substance P in brain regions that coordinate stress responses and receive convergent monoaminergic innervation suggested that substance P antagonists might have psychotherapeutic properties. Like clinically used antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs, substance P antagonists suppressed isolation-induced vocalizations in guinea pigs. In a placebo-controlled trial in patients with moderate to severe major depression, robust antidepressant effects of the substance P antagonist MK-869 were consistently observed. In preclinical studies, substance P antagonists did not interact with monoamine systems in the manner seen with established antidepressant drugs. These findings suggest that substance P may play an important role in psychiatric disorders.

Guidelines for conducting bridging studies in Alzheimer disease.

This report provides guidelines for conducting bridging studies in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Bridging studies are late phase I safety/tolerance studies that determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in patients before phase II efficacy studies are initiated, facilitating the transition from phase I to phase II development. Determining the MTD in patients maximizes the potential to detect efficacy by permitting the use of the highest tolerated doses in phase II while providing a good understanding of potential adverse events. Bridging studies should be double-blind, placebo-controlled, inpatient studies conducted in acute-care facilities by clinical personnel who are equipped to handle unexpected contingencies under the oversight of a competent, multidisciplinary review board. Patients should be in good physical health (excluding AD), and a comprehensive informed consent procedure must be instituted. We recommend initially using a fixed-dose panel design with a dose schedule based on the MTD in normal volunteers and later establishing the dose titration MTD.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of avitriptan in patients with migraine after oral dosing.

Avitriptan (BMS-180048) is a 5-HT1-like receptor agonist for the treatment of migraine. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and preliminary efficacy of avitriptan in patients with migraine during migrainous and pain-free states. Patients met the IHS criteria for migraine with or without aura and suffered one to six migraines per month for at least 1 year. Patients in a clinic experiencing a migraine headache received avitriptan 75 mg, 150 mg, or 200 mg or matching placebo capsules. Blood samples were obtained before and 0.25, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after dosing. Headache intensity was rated before and up to 6 hours after dosing. Seven to 30 days after the inclinic treatment, patients returned in a pain-free state for the same study medication. All pharmacokinetic and safety measures were repeated. Forty-eight patients (9 men and 39 women) participated. Peak plasma concentrations of avitriptan were achieved 1 to 2 hours following dosing in migraine and pain-free states for all doses. The pharmacokinetics of avitriptan were proportional to dose during a migraine attack over the 75- to 200-mg dose range. The 150- and 200-mg doses of avitriptan demonstrated a greater decrease in headache intensity scores at 2 hours postdose. The most common adverse event was paresthesia. Thus, avitriptan was rapidly absorbed, well tolerated, and demonstrated preliminary efficacy in this population.