Syndrome-Related Risk Factors for Sexual Abuse: The Example of Prader-Willi Syndrome.

Many genetic disorders associated with intellectual disability are characterized by unique behavioral phenotypes which may have serious psychological consequences such as increasing the risk for sexual abuse (SA). Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS), a severe neurogenetic syndrome with uncontrollable hyperphagia and high threshold for pain, is an excellent example of this issue. The absence of reports on SA in PWS highlights the lack of awareness to the topic. Our aim was to report on SA in individuals with PWS, describe its unique characteristics, and offer recommendations for its prevention. Caregivers of all individuals with genetically confirmed PWS living in the only two residential facilities designated for PWS in Israel were interviewed for a history of sexual behavior and abuse, and medical data were collected from their files. SA was reported in a quarter of the sample. In most of the cases (78%), food reward was used by the perpetrators to attract their victims. Age at SA ranged from 11 to 29 years. Most of the individuals did not disclose the event and some continued to initiate inappropriate sexual activity to obtain food. Characteristics unique to PWS, such as food-seeking behaviors and high threshold for pain, likely contribute to the risk for SA. These findings suggest that syndrome-specific programs for SA prevention should be considered for individuals with any genetic syndrome with behavioral problems that may increase SA risk.

Breast cancer risk and hormone replacement therapy among BRCA carriers after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

INTRODUCTION: BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers often undergo risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) before natural menopause, raising the issue of hormonal replacement treatment (HRT) use. There is conflicting evidence on the effect of HRT on breast cancer (BC) risk, and there are limited data on risk based on age at exposure. In the general population, HRT users have an increased BC risk (hazard ratio = 1.34). We assessed the impact of short-term HRT use on BC risk among healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, with emphasis on age at exposure to HRT. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 306 consecutive healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who had undergone RRSO was followed up for a mean of 7.26 years. We compared BC incidence over time in carriers who received HRT with that in those who did not receive. RESULTS: Thirty-six of the carriers were diagnosed with BC, 20 of 148 patients (13.5%) in the HRT group compared with 16 of 155 (10.3%) in the non-HRT group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.7-2.7). In women who were aged 45 years or younger at RRSO, HRT did not affect BC rates. However, in those older than 45 years at RRSO, BC rates were significantly higher in HRT users than in non-users (OR = 3.43, p < 0.05, 95% CI = 1.2-9.8). CONCLUSIONS: In BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers in this study, short-term post-RRSO HRT use was associated with a threefold risk of BC in carriers older than 45 years. These results suggest that risk may be related to time of exposure to HRT around the natural age of menopause, even among BRCA1/2 carriers. Further studies are needed for validation and to guide future recommendations.

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) for copy number variants of uncertain significance (CNV- VUS) in the genomic era: to do or not to do?

PURPOSE: To review cases of couples presented to our PGT-unit with copy number variants (CNVs) classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in order to better understand their needs. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary medical-center, 2014-2019. We reviewed files of all couples applying for genetic counseling with CNVs classified as VUS. The main outcomes measured: number of VUS findings and their description, PGT-M procedures planned and performed, IVF cycles, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates (LBR). VUS were classified according to the American-College of Medical-Genetics and Genomics classification at time of first consultation, and updated-December 2018. RESULTS: Twenty-four couples presented with a total of 30 VUS. Twelve couples (50%) had isolated VUS and 12 (50%) had VUS diagnosed in addition to a pathogenic mutation. Initially, nine findings (30%) were defined as VUS; eight (27%) as likely benign (b-VUS); and 13 (43%) as likely pathogenic (p-VUS). PGT-M was recommended for 17/30 CNVs (56.6%), 12 (70%) of which, isolated VUS. No couple had other indications for IVF. To date, nine couples performed PGT-M for isolated VUS; LBR per-couple-55.5%. Five couples performed PGT-M for both pathogenic findings and VUS, LBR-80%. After reviewing VUS classifications, 30% remained unchanged, 20% were more severely defined, and 50% less severely defined. CONCLUSION: The genomic era enables detection of VUS whose definition is subject to change as additional information becomes available. The uncertainty of variants' clinical significance and changes in VUS definition over time complicates genetic counseling. Revised guidelines for VUS interpretation and reevaluation of patient counseling before each pregnancy must be practiced when counseling them regarding the justification of PGT-M for their diagnosed VUS.