Application of new innovations/technology for care of end-stage renal disease in a resource-limited environment.

The costs involved in the management of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are overwhelming the healthcare commitments of countries worldwide and even more so in resource-limited settings. Some countries have intelligently managed to implement universal healthcare coverage for their citizens. Many others, unable to achieve this, have sensibly concentrated on spending their limited resources on less expensive but more important healthcare issues, such as preventive care especially in the areas of waterborne diseases and implementation of universal vaccination. This however leaves a large section of the population with ESRD vulnerable, and it is up to the various stakeholders, including the medical professions, to innovate and partly alleviate their suffering as a social responsibility.

Correction to: Efficacy, tolerability and safety of darbepoetin alfa injection for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis: a randomized, phase-III trial.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported errors in the presentation of Tables 2, 4 and 5.

Efficacy, tolerability and safety of darbepoetin alfa injection for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing dialysis: a randomized, phase-III trial.

BACKGROUND: Darbepoetin alfa (DA-α) is a long-acting erythropoiesis-stimulating glycoprotein which has half-life three-fold longer than that of Erythropoietin alfa (EPO). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of DA-α injection versus EPO for treating renal anemia amongst Indian patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis. METHODS: Patients of either gender (aged 18-65 years) with ESRD undergoing dialysis who had hemoglobin (Hb) levels < 10 g/dL after receiving EPO were switched to DA-α (0.45 µg/kg) once weekly subcutaneously or EPO 50 IU/kg thrice weekly subcutaneously (centrally randomized 1:1) for 12-24 weeks (correction phase) followed by 12 weeks maintenance phase (for Hb levels ≥10 g/dL). The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change in Hb level from baseline to end of correction phase. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat population (n = 126), the between group difference in mean Hb change was - 0.01 g/dL (95% CI - 0.68 to - 0.66, p = 0.97). After adjusting for covariates, the difference was - 0.2878 g/dL (95% CI -0.936 to0.360). The lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI of primary endpoint was above the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of - 1.0 g/dL. Similar trend of non-inferiority was observed for per-protocol population. Safety profile of DA-α and EPO were observed to be similar. CONCLUSION: Our study results demonstrated that for patients with ESRD undergoing dialysis, administering DA-α at lower dose frequency, is equally effective and well tolerated as EPO for treating renal anemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2012/07/002835 [Registered on: 27/07/2012]; Trial Registered Prospectively.