RESUMO
Background: Neurological disorders are common in the general population and the majority of patients have other chronic diseases, necessitating the use of multiple medications, which increases the incidence of drug-related problems (DRPs). Studies from different countries discovered an average of 0.29-1.45 DRPs per patient admitted into the neurology unit. Objectives: To identify common DRPs and to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist's interventions in resolving the identified DRPs in patients with neurological disorders. Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Neurology in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Southern India, for a period of six months. Patients aged ≥18 years and had been hospitalized for >24 h, were intensively monitored until discharge for the occurrence of any DRPs and pharmacist interventions were provided. The identified DRPs were classified according to Hepler and Strand's Classification. Results: A total of 310 prescriptions were reviewed, of which 174 patients (mean age 45.93 ± 2.49 years) experienced at least one DRP during their hospital stay. The average DRP per patient was found to be 1.75, with drug-drug interactions [254 (83%)] being the predominant DRPs, followed by adverse drug reactions [13 (4%)], and drug duplications [9 (3%)]. Most of the drug-drug interactions were pharmacokinetic [144 (56.69%)]. Hyponatremia [2 (15%)]; and nausea and vomiting [2 (15%)] were most commonly reported ADRs. All 306 DRPs involved active clinical pharmacist intervention, of which [275 (89.87%)] of pharmacists' interventions were accepted, which led to modification of the therapy. Conclusion: Monitoring the use of drugs allowed the clinical pharmacist to detect DRPs and to suggest interventions that promote rational drug prescribing, therapy optimization and enhanced patient safety.
RESUMO
Any healthcare systems during a pandemic undergo tremendous pressure in pursuit of effective treatment to treat and limit the spread of the disease and its implications. Conducting clinical trials to find the potential therapy is the only way to battle the current coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. The majority of the countries have joined the cause and are carrying out clinical studies in various capacities. As a result, the ethical committees have encountered a sudden inflow of a large number of trial proposals that have placed them under pressure. Although ethical committees play a vital role in protecting patient safety and preserving research integrity, they need to make sure the efficiency and integrity of review are preserved and the standards of review are not relaxed. Thus, the participants' dignity is well guarded while keeping a close check on their safety.
RESUMO
IntroductionThe COVID-19 outbreak created a major panic among all the citizens of the country owing to its severity, contagiousness within the community, lack of specific treatment and possibility of re-infection. All these factors along with the uncertain behaviour of the virus lead to state of fear and concern all throught out the nation. The current study represents the mental health survey conducted on the students of South Indiaafter the completion of one month quarantine period of the COVID-19 outbreak. MethodologyThe present study is a cross-sectional, web-based online survey which consists of 21-item DASS questionnaire. Thiswas used to assess the emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Using Google Forms, the questionnaire was randomly distributed among the pharmacy students of selected colleges. Mean with standard deviation was calculated for continuous variables and the number with percentage was calculated for categorical variables. ResultsA total of 500 participants responded to the questionnaire. More than half of the responses were received from females (65%). On assessment it was found that, 26 % of respondents reported severe to extremely severe depressive symptoms; 31.5 % of respondents reported severe to extremely severe anxiety symptoms, and 19 % reported severe to extremely severe stress levels. ConclusionIn India during the outbreak of COVID-19, an alarming number of students were found to have an impact on mental health due to the outbreak and were observed to have higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression. The study findings shows the need of conducting more such studies and can be used to prepare appropriate psychological interventions to improvemental health among the young public during the pandemic.
