RESUMO
Geriatric patients frequently encounter orthostatic hypotension (OH), a multifaceted condition characterized by a significant drop in blood pressure upon assuming an upright position. As the elderly population is particularly susceptible to OH, our review endeavors to comprehensively explore the complex nature of this condition and various factors contributing to its development. We investigate the impact of comorbidities, polypharmacy, age-related physiological changes, and autonomic dysfunction in the pathogenesis of OH. Geriatric patients with OH are faced with an elevated risk of falls, syncope, a decline in their overall quality of life, and hence increased mortality. These implications require careful consideration, necessitating a thorough examination of therapeutic strategies. We evaluate various pharmaceutical and nonpharmacological therapies, delving into the effectiveness and safety of each approach in managing OH within geriatric populations. We explore the role of pharmacotherapy in alleviating symptoms and mitigating OH-related complications, as well as the potential benefits of volume expansion techniques to augment blood volume and stabilize blood pressure. We place particular emphasis on the significance of lifestyle changes and nonpharmacological interventions in enhancing OH management among the elderly. These interventions encompass dietary modifications, regular physical activity, and postural training, all tailored to the unique needs of the individual patient. To optimize outcomes and ensure patient safety, we underscore the importance of individualized treatment plans that take into account the geriatric patient's overall health status, existing comorbidities, and potential interactions with other medications. This review aims to improve clinical practice and patient outcomes by advocating for early detection, properly tailored management, and targeted interventions to address OH in the elderly population. By raising awareness of OH's prevalence and complexities among healthcare professionals, we hope to foster a comprehensive understanding of OH and contribute to the overall wellness and quality of life of this vulnerable demographic.
RESUMO
Multidisciplinary rounds (MDR) constitute a patient-centered care model wherein professionals from diverse disciplines collaborate in real time to provide specialized expertise. The MDR team, encompassing care partners, hospitalists, nurses, pharmacists, and more, employs a collaborative approach that optimizes patient care through shared goals, electronic record access, regular reviews, and patient involvement. MDRs have evolved to reduce patient mortality, complications, length of stay, and readmissions, and they enhance patient satisfaction and utilization of ancillary services. Family engagement in MDRs further transforms relationships from adversarial to collaborative, leading to improved comprehension of treatment strategies and smoother navigation of challenging conversations. Despite challenges such as time constraints, limited patient coverage, and hierarchical barriers, MDRs are being increasingly conducted across healthcare settings, with positive outcomes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Previous research has shown that altering the nasal signal level auditory feedback changed the control of oral-nasal balance in normal speakers. The present study investigated whether knowledge of the task and the instruction not to compensate would change the participants' response to the manipulation. METHODS: Twenty participants (10 females) in 2 groups continuously repeated a sentence while their nasal signal level was increased or decreased and fed back to them via headphones, so the speakers heard themselves as more or less nasal, respectively. After the first recording session, participants were debriefed about the true nature of the experiment. They were instructed not to compensate in the second recording session. The outcome measures were the percentage changes of nasalance scores from the first baseline. RESULTS: Statistical analysis using a repeated measures analysis of variance showed an effect of the nasal signal level, F(5,80) = 2.51, p = 0.049, and a nasal signal level by knowledge of task interaction effect, F(5,80) = 3.25, p = 0.019. Post hoc tests showed that the maximum nasal signal level auditory feedback resulted in a significant decrease of nasality from the initial baseline. CONCLUSION: Despite knowledge of the task, speakers were unable to resist compensating. As found in previous research, there was a numerically higher compensation response at the maximum than at the minimum nasal signal level auditory feedback condition.
