Eradication of cervical canal colonization associated with prophylactic cervical cerclage: the look further study.

OBJECTIVES: The perioperative management of the cervical cerclage procedure is not unified. In general population controlling microbiome cervical status does not affect obstetric outcomes, but it might be beneficial in patients with cervical insufficiency. The aim of our study was to present the obstetric, neonatal and pediatric outcomes of patients undergoing the cervical cerclage placement procedure in our obstetric department using a regimen of care that includes control of the microbiological status of the cervix and elimination of the pathogens detected. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients undergoing cervical cerclage in the 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, were included in the study. The procedure was performed only after receiving a negative culture from the cervical canal. RESULTS: Thirty-one (88.6%) patients delivered after the 34th and twenty-eight (80.0%) after the 37th week of gestation. The colonization of the genital tract was present in 31% of patients prior to the procedure, in 42% of patients - during the subsequent pregnancy course and in 48% of patients - before delivery. A total of 85% of patients who had miscarriage or delivered prematurely had abnormal cervical cultures. In patients with normal cervical cultures, and 91.7% of women delivered at term. No abnormalities in children's development were found. CONCLUSIONS: Controlling microbiological status of the cervical canal results in better or similar outcomes to those reported by other authors in terms of obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Active eradication of the reproductive tract colonization potentially increases the effectiveness of the cervical cerclage placement.

Association between antenatal classes attendance and perceived fear and pain during labour.

OBJECTIVES: Antenatal classes are a common method of preparation for birth with proven efficiency in improving perinatal outcomes. Yet, their impact on fear perception during labour has not been identified. The aim of the study was to analyse whether preparation for labour by means of antenatal classes attendance could be associated with decrease in level of experienced fear and pain during birth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a cross-sectional study of 147 women who had given vaginal births. Data was collected from mothers between 24 and 72 h postpartum. Patients answered self-reported questionnaires concerning subjective perception of birth including Delivery Fear Scale (DFS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for fear and pain assessment. The study group was divided into subgroups depending on parity and antenatal classes attendance. RESULTS: Patients in the primiparas subgroup who attended antenatal classes scored lower in the DFS (48.7 ± 23.5 vs. 60.2 ± 16.5, p < .03). There was no difference in the DFS score in the multiparas subgroup (p < .90). No significant differences in the NRS score depending on antenatal classes attendance in any subgroup were observed. CONCLUSION: Participation in antenatal classes should be advised to every pregnant primiparous woman as this type of non-invasive preparation lowers level of fear experienced during childbirth.