Girl predominance in trampoline-related forearm shaft fractures and their increasing incidence since 2000.

BACKGROUND: There are reports of increasing incidence of forearm shaft fractures in children. Their treatment has been preferably nonoperative but surgical fixation has gained popularity due to elastic stable intramedullary nailing. We aimed to study whether the incidence of pediatric both-bone forearm shaft fractures and their operative care have changed since year 2000. Trampoline injuries, in particular, and their treatment, re-displacement and short-term outcomes were the secondary outcomes of the study. METHODS: A population-based study in the geographic catchment area of Oulu University Hospital district in 20-years of time period (2000 - 2019) was performed. Altogether 481 diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures in children (< 16 years) were included. Age- and sex-related incidence rates were determined, by using the official numbers of the population-in-risk by Statistics Finland. Trampoline jumping and other types of injury were reviewed, as well as particulars of treatment and outcomes. RESULTS: The incidence of diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures increased from 9.4/100 000 in 2000-2001 to 41.7/100 000 in 2018-2019 (P < 0.001). Surgical treatment increased respectively (from 8.8/100 000 in 2000-2001 to 35.3/100 000 in 2018-2019, P < 0.0001). Trampoline injuries explained one in three (29%) of all fractures; they increased from 0% in 2000-2001 to 36.6% in 2018-2019 (P < 0.001). During the last four years of the study (2016-2019), most trampoline-related injuries occurred among girls (61.2%), compared to boys (38.8%) (P = 0.031). Trampoline-related injuries comprised 46.9% of all fractures in girls, compared to 26.0% among boys (Diff. 20.8%, 4.7% to 36.1%, P = 0.009). The mean age of the patients elevated from 6.4 years (2000-2001) to 8.6 years (2018-2019) (P = 0.015). Boys predominated (69.6%) in 2000-2009 but during the last ten years, there was no statistical difference in distribution between the genders (males 54.6%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: During the twenty-year's of study period, the incidence of pediatric diaphyseal forearm fractures increased fivefold. Trampolining was the most usual single reason for the fractures. More attention should be focused to increase the safety of trampoline jumping, in particular among the girls.

Clinical Follow-Up without Radiographs Is Sufficient after Most Nonoperatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in Children.

Distal forearm fractures are common in children and are usually treated nonoperatively. No consensus has been reached on how to perform clinical and radiographic follow-up of these fractures. Our aim was to study whether radiographic and clinical follow-up is justified. We included 100 consecutive patients with non-operatively treated distal forearm fractures who were treated at Oulu University Hospital in 2010-2011. The natural history of the fractures during the nonoperative treatment was analyzed by measuring the potential worsening of the alignment during the follow-up period. The limits of acceptable fracture position were set according to the current literature using "strict" or "wide" criteria for alignment. We determined the rate of worsening fracture position (i.e., patients who reached the threshold of unacceptable alignment). In relation to splinting, we evaluated how many patients benefited from clinical follow-up. Most of the fractures (98%) preserved acceptable alignment during the entire follow-up period when wide criteria were used. The application of stricter criteria for alignment in radiographs showed loss of reduction in 19% of the fractures. Worsening of the alignment was recognized at a mean of 13 days (range 5-29) after the injury. One in three (32%) patients needed some intervention due to splint loosening or failure. Radiographic follow-up of nonoperatively treated distal forearm fractures remains questionable. Instead, clinical follow-up is important, as 32% of patients needed their splints fixed.

Determining the development stage of the ossification centers around the elbow may aid in deciding whether to use ESIN or not in adolescents' forearm shaft fractures.

Background and purpose - Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) is the preferred method of operative stabilization of unstable pediatric forearm shaft fractures. However, the decision whether to use ESIN or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in older children or teenagers is not always straightforward. We hypothesized that the development stage of the elbow would aid in evaluating the eligibility of the patient for ESIN.Patients and methods - All eligible children, aged <16 years who were treated with ESIN in Oulu University Hospital, during 2010-2019 were included (N = 70). The development stages of 4 ossification centers were assessed according to the Sauvegrain and Diméglio scoring. The proportion of impaired union vs. union was analyzed according to bone maturity, by using the optimal cutoff-points determined with receiver operating characteristics (ROC).Results - Development stage ≥ 6 in the olecranon was associated with impaired union in 20% of patients, compared with none in stages 1-5 (95% CI of difference 8% to 24%). Trochlear ossification center ≥ 4 was associated with impaired union in 17% of patients (CI of difference 7% to 36%) and lateral condyle ≥ 6 in 13% of patients (CI of difference 3.4% to 30%). Proximal radial head ≥ 5.5 was associated with impaired union in 18% of patients (CI of difference 7% to 39%).Interpretation - Recognizing the rectangular or fused olecranon ossification center, referring to stage ≥ 6, was in particular associated with impaired fracture healing. This finding may aid clinicians to consider between ESIN and plating, when treating forearm shaft fracture of an older child or teenager.