How much does care in palliative care wards cost in Poland?

INTRODUCTION: The main task of palliative care units is to provide a dignified life for people with advanced progressive chronic disease through appropriate symptom management, communication between medical specialists and the patient and his family, as well as the coordination of care. Many palliative care units struggle with low incomes from the National Health Fund (NHF), which causes serious economic problems. The aim of the study was to estimate of direct and administrative costs of care and the actual cost per patient per day in selected palliative care units and comparison of the results to the valuation of the NHF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study of the costs of hospitalization of 175 patients was conducted prospectively in five palliative care units (PCUs). The costs directly associated with care were recorded on the specially prepared forms in each unit and also personnel and administrative costs provided by the accounting departments. RESULTS: The total costs of analyzed units amounted to 209 002 EUR (898 712 PLN), while the payment for palliative care services from the NHF amounted to 126 010 EUR (541 844 PLN), which accounted for only 60% of the costs incurred by the units. The average cost per person per day of hospitalization, calculated according to the actual duration of hospitalization in the unit, was 83 EUR (357 PLN), and the average payment from the NHF was 52.8 EUR (227 PLN). Underpayment per person per day was approximately 29.2 EUR (125 PLN). CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a significant difference between the actual cost of palliative care units and the level of refund from the NHF. Based on the analysis of costs, the application has been submitted to the NHF to change the reimbursement amount of palliative care services in 2013.

Efficacy and safety of fentanyl pectin nasal spray compared with immediate-release morphine sulfate tablets in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, double-dummy multiple-crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Immediate-release morphine sulfate (IRMS) remains the standard treatment for breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP), but its onset of effect does not match the rapid onset and short duration of most BTCP episodes. OBJECTIVE: This study will evaluate the efficacy/tolerability of fentanyl pectin nasal spray (FPNS) compared with IRMS for BTCP. METHODS: Patients (n = 110) experiencing one to four BTCP episodes/day while taking ≥ 60 mg/day oral morphine (or equivalent) for background cancer pain entered a double-blind, double-dummy (DB/DD), multiple-crossover study. Patients completing a titration phase (n = 84) continued to a DB/DD phase: 10 episodes of BTCP were randomly treated with FPNS and oral capsule placebo (five episodes) or IRMS and nasal spray placebo (5 episodes). The primary end point was pain intensity (P < .05 FPNS vs. IRMS) difference from baseline at 15 minutes (PID(15)). Secondary end points were onset of pain intensity (PI) decrease (≥ 1-point) and time to clinically meaningful pain relief (CMPR, ≥ 2-point PI decrease). Safety and tolerability were evaluated by adverse events (AEs) and nasal assessments. By-patient and by-episode analyses were completed. RESULTS: Compared with IRMS, FPNS significantly improved mean PID(15) scores. 57.5% of FPNS-treated episodes significantly demonstrated onset of PI improvement by 5 minutes and 95.7% by 30 minutes. CMPR (≥ 2-point PI decrease) was seen in 52.4% of episodes by 10 minutes. Only 4.7% of patients withdrew from titration (2.4% in DB/DD phase) because of AEs; no significant nasal effects were reported. CONCLUSION: FPNS was efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of BTCP and provided faster onset of analgesia and attainment of CMPR than IRMS.