Electromagnetic fields in the treatment of chronic lower back pain in patients with degenerative disc disease.

AIM: To examine the effects of low-amplitude, low frequency electromagnetic field therapy (EMF) therapy in patients with persistent chronic lower back pain associated with degenerative disc disease. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized and placebo controlled. INTERVENTION: EMF using a medical device resonator; control group underwent same procedures, except the device was turned off. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain reduction and mobility. RESULTS: Improvements in overall physical health, social functioning and reduction in bodily pain were observed in the EMF group. The pain relief rating scale showed a higher level of pain relief at the target area in the EMF group. An increase in left lateral mobility was seen only in the EMF group. CONCLUSION: EMF treatment may be of benefit to patients with chronic nonresponsive lower back pain associated with degenerative disc disease.

Characteristics of women with continued use of vaginal pessaries.

Vaginal pessaries have been shown to be a safe, effective treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, and in some cases, female urinary incontinence. There are limited data that predict long-term pessary use; therefore, the aim of this retrospective, exploratory study was to describe selected characteristics of women using a pessary for 12 months or longer in a nurse-run clinic.

A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of ERCP in octogenarians.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatobiliary disease is increased in elderly patients. Because of significant comorbidities, these patients may be at greater risk of developing complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopantreatography (ERCP). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the indications, interventions, and complications of ERCP of octogenarians with nonoctogenarians. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient records from a single tertiary care hospital was performed. Adult patients undergoing ERCP were divided into two groups according to age. Group 1 patients were of age < 80 years (N = 391), and group 2 patients were > 80 years of age (N = 102). Indications, therapeutic interventions, use of conscious sedation, duration of procedure and complications were retrieved from the patient records. Main outcome measurements included: indications, therapeutic interventions, use of conscious sedation, duration of procedure and complications. RESULTS: There was an increase in sphincterotomy rates (74 vs 63%; P < 0.05) and stent insertions (48 vs 29%; P < 0.001) in the octogenarian group. In group 1 there were 19 cases (4.9%) of post ERCP pancreatitis who spent 251 hospital days (including 59 ICU days) compared with one case (0.98%) in group 2 who required ten hospital days (P < 0.05) and 0 ICU days. Procedure time for octogenarians was greater than nonoctogenarians (33.1 vs 29.8 min; P < 0.05). Octogenarians required less conscious sedation than nonoctogenarians (midazolam 4.1 vs 5.9 mg; P < 0.05 and fentanyl 45.5 vs 80.4 mcg; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In octogenarians, ERCP is efficacious and safe. It is associated with a lower rate of hospitalization for pancreatitis. ERCP in octogenarians takes longer, is associated with increased interventions (stent insertion and sphincterotomy) and requires less sedation.