Anesthesiologic Management of Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transapical Procedures: Which Challenges in the Modern Era?

OBJECTIVE: Patients undergoing transapical cardiac procedure are a minority of cardiac surgery patients but represent a challenge for cardiac anesthesiologists because they generally are older and have more comorbidities than do open heart cardiac surgery patients. The aims of this study were to describe the anesthetic experience with transapical procedures in a single high-volume center and to analyze the most critical aspects for anesthetic management. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing a cardiac transapical procedure from January 2009 to April 2018 were included in this case series. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were managed by a multidisciplinary heart team. The perioperative anesthetic approach and hemodynamic management were consistent and performed by a group of trained cardiac anesthesiologists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population comprised 143 patients: 81 (57%) underwent an aortic valve procedure, 60 (42%) a mitral valve intervention, 1 patient underwent a procedure involving both the aortic and mitral valves, and 1 patient underwent correction of a congenital heart defect. A major intraoperative complication occurred in 5 (3.5%) patients, the procedure was not technically feasible because of unsuitable anatomy in 3 patients, and conversion to open heart surgery was needed in 2 patients. All patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. Intensive care unit stay was 1 (1-3) days, and hospital stay was 6 (5-8) days. Hospital survival was 94%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing transapical cardiac procedures are a minority of cardiac surgery patients, but represent a high-risk population. A patient-tailored anesthetic approach, in the context of the therapeutic strategy shared by the heart team, is crucial to improve outcomes.

Undiagnosed vertebral hemangioma causing a lumbar compression fracture and epidural hematoma in a parturient undergoing vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral hemangiomas are benign vascular tumours of the bony spine which are usually asymptomatic. Pregnancy-related anatomical and hormonal changes may lead to expansion of hemangiomas and development of neurological symptoms. We present an unusual case of vertebral fracture due to an undiagnosed hemangioma presenting as postpartum back pain following epidural analgesia. CASE PRESENTATION: A multiparous female with an unremarkable history developed intense lumbar pain after vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia. The pain was attributed to tissue trauma associated with the epidural technique. The patient had no clinical improvement with analgesics, and her symptoms deteriorated over the following days. A magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed an acute fracture of the second lumbar vertebra (L2) with epidural extension and mild compression of the dural sac, suggesting hemangioma as the underlying cause. The patient underwent successful spinal surgery with pedicle screw fixation to stabilize the fracture. CONCLUSION: Vertebral fractures secondary to acute expansion of a vertebral hemangioma rarely occur during vaginal delivery. In such cases, the labour epidural technique and analgesia may challenge the physician in making the diagnosis. Postpartum severe back pain should be thoroughly investigated even in the absence of neurological deficits, and osseous spinal pathology should be considered in the differential diagnosis.