Therapeutic efficacy of intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: survival and nutrition outcome.

The clinical introduction of intestinal transplantation has added a new dimension and offered a valid therapeutic option for patients with irreversible intestinal failure. In the year 2000, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recognized intestinal, combined liver-intestinal, and multivisceral transplantation as the standard of care for patients with irreversible intestinal and parenteral nutrition (PN) failure. Accordingly, the indications for the procedure are currently limited to those who develop life-threatening PN complications. However, a recent improvement in survival similar to other solid organ transplant recipients should justify lifting the current restricted criteria, and the procedure should be considered before the development of PN failure. Equally important is the awareness of the recent evolution in nutrition management and outcome after transplantation. Early and progressive enteral feeding using a complex polymeric formula is safe and effective after successful transplantation. Full nutrition autonomy is universally achievable among most intestinal and multivisceral recipients, with enjoyment of unrestricted oral diet. Such a therapeutic benefit is commonly maintained among long-term survivors, with full rehabilitation and restoration of quality of life.

Nutrition and quality of life following small intestinal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The outcome from small bowel transplantation (SBTx) has improved progressively over the past decade raising questions as to whether indications should be broadened from those currently followed based on "TPN (total parenteral nutrition) failure." OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To assess current outcome, we studied the effect of transplantation on nutritional autonomy, organ function, and quality of life (QoL) measured by a validated self-administered questionnaire containing 26 domains and 130 questions, for a minimum of 12 months in a cohort of 46 consecutively transplanted patients between June 2003 and July 2004. The majority of transplanted patients (76%) had intestinal failure because of extreme short bowel, the remainder having either chronic pseudo-obstruction or porto-mesenteric vein thrombosis (PMVT). All but the PMVT patients were dependent on home TPN (HPN) (median 2, range 0-25 yr) and had developed serious recurrent infective complications with (25%) or without central vein thrombosis and liver failure. Sixty-one percent received a liver in addition to a small intestine. RESULTS: Follow-up was for a mean of 21 (range 12-36) months. Five patients died, two with chronic graft rejection. All the remaining patients have graft survival with an average of 1.2 (range 0-5) episodes of acute rejection. All patients were weaned from TPN by a median of 18 days (range 1-117 days) and from tube feeding by day 69 (range 22-272 days). There was a significant improvement in overall assessment of QoL and in 13 of 26 of the specific domains examined. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm the claim that a new era has dawned for SBTx, such that, with continued progress, it can potentially become an alternative to HPN for the management of permanent intestinal failure, rather than a last-chance treatment for "TPN failure."

De novo malignancies after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance immunosuppression required after organ transplantation creates a permissive environment in which cancer cells can proliferate because of lack of natural immunologic surveillance. With more than a decade of clinical experience, this report is the first to address the risk of de novo cancer after intestinal transplantation. METHODS: A total of 168 consecutive intestinal transplant recipients (86 children and 82 adults) were studied, of whom 52% were male and 91% were white. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data was used to count expected rates of de novo cancers in the general population matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up of 47+/-41 months, 7 (4.2%) patients developed nonlymphoid de novo cancer, with a cumulative risk of 3% at 5 years and 28% at 10 years. Of these malignancies, one was donor-driven adenocarcinoma. With 0.58 being the expected rate of malignancy for the general population, the risk among intestinal recipients was 8.7 times higher (P =0.01). Such morbidity was significantly higher (50 times) among younger patients (<25 years), with a slight male preponderance. Induction immunosuppression was associated with early onset of de novo cancer. Patient survival after diagnosis of de novo cancer was 72% at 1 year, 57% at 2 years, and 29% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: With conventional immunosuppression, intestinal recipients are at a significantly higher risk of developing de novo cancer when compared with the general population. Thus, a novel tolerogenic immunosuppressive strategy has been recently implemented to reduce the lifelong need for immunosuppression.