Computational Workflow for Refining AlphaFold Models in Drug Design Using Kinetic and Thermodynamic Binding Calculations: A Case Study for the Unresolved Inactive Human Adenosine A3 Receptor.

A structure-based drug design pipeline that considers both thermodynamic and kinetic binding data of ligands against a receptor will enable the computational design of improved drug molecules. For unresolved GPCR-ligand complexes, a workflow that can apply both thermodynamic and kinetic binding data in combination with alpha-fold (AF)-derived or other homology models and experimentally resolved binding modes of relevant ligands in GPCR-homologs needs to be tested. Here, as test case, we studied a congeneric set of ligands that bind to a structurally unresolved G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), the inactive human adenosine A3 receptor (hA3R). We tested three available homology models from which two have been generated from experimental structures of hA1R or hA2AR and one model was a multistate alphafold 2 (AF2)-derived model. We applied alchemical calculations with thermodynamic integration coupled with molecular dynamics (TI/MD) simulations to calculate the experimental relative binding free energies and residence time (τ)-random accelerated MD (τ-RAMD) simulations to calculate the relative residence times (RTs) for antagonists. While the TI/MD calculations produced, for the three homology models, good Pearson correlation coefficients, correspondingly, r = 0.74, 0.62, and 0.67 and mean unsigned error (mue) values of 0.94, 1.31, and 0.81 kcal mol-1, the τ-RAMD method showed r = 0.92 and 0.52 for the first two models but failed to produce accurate results for the multistate AF2-derived model. With subsequent optimization of the AF2-derived model by reorientation of the side chain of R1735.34 located in the extracellular loop 2 (EL2) that blocked ligand's unbinding, the computational model showed r = 0.84 for kinetic data and improved performance for thermodynamic data (r = 0.81, mue = 0.56 kcal mol-1). Overall, after refining the multistate AF2 model with physics-based tools, we were able to show a strong correlation between predicted and experimental ligand relative residence times and affinities, achieving a level of accuracy comparable to an experimental structure. The computational workflow used can be applied to other receptors, helping to rank candidate drugs in a congeneric series and enabling the prioritization of leads with stronger binding affinities and longer residence times.

Accurate calculation of affinity changes to the close state of influenza A M2 transmembrane domain in response to subtle structural changes of adamantyl amines using free energy perturbation methods in different lipid bilayers.

Experimental binding free energies of 27 adamantyl amines against the influenza M2(22-46) WT tetramer, in its closed form at pH 8, were measured by ITC in DPC micelles. The measured Kd's range is ~44 while the antiviral potencies (IC50) range is ~750 with a good correlation between binding free energies computed with Kd and IC50 values (r = 0.76). We explored with MD simulations (ff19sb, CHARMM36m) the binding profile of complexes with strong, moderate and weak binders embedded in DMPC, DPPC, POPC or a viral mimetic membrane and using different experimental starting structures of M2. To predict accurately differences in binding free energy in response to subtle changes in the structure of the ligands, we performed 18 alchemical perturbative single topology FEP/MD NPT simulations (OPLS2005) using the BAR estimator (Desmond software) and 20 dual topology calculations TI/MD NVT simulations (ff19sb) using the MBAR estimator (Amber software) for adamantyl amines in complex with M2(22-46) WT in DMPC, DPPC, POPC. We observed that both methods with all lipids show a very good correlation between the experimental and calculated relative binding free energies (r = 0.77-0.87, mue = 0.36-0.92 kcal mol-1) with the highest performance achieved with TI/MBAR and lowest performance with FEP/BAR in DMPC bilayers. When antiviral potencies are used instead of the Kd values for computing the experimental binding free energies we obtained also good performance with both FEP/BAR (r = 0.83, mue = 0.75 kcal mol-1) and TI/MBAR (r = 0.69, mue = 0.77 kcal mol-1).

Dual A1/A3 Adenosine Receptor Antagonists: Binding Kinetics and Structure-Activity Relationship Studies Using Mutagenesis and Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Drugs targeting adenosine receptors (AR) can provide treatment for diseases. We report the identification of 7-(phenylamino)-pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridines L2-L10, A15, and A17 as low-micromolar to low-nanomolar A1R/A3R dual antagonists, with 3-phenyl-5-cyano-7-(trimethoxyphenylamino)-pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridine (A17) displaying the highest affinity at both receptors with a long residence time of binding, as determined using a NanoBRET-based assay. Two binding orientations of A17 produce stable complexes inside the orthosteric binding area of A1R in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and we selected the most plausible orientation based on the agreement with alanine mutagenesis supported by affinity experiments. Interestingly, for drug design purposes, the mutation of L2506.51 to alanine increased the binding affinity of A17 at A1R. We explored the structure-activity relationships against A1R using alchemical binding free energy calculations with the thermodynamic integration coupled with the MD simulation (TI/MD) method, applied on the whole G-protein-coupled receptor-membrane system, which showed a good agreement (r = 0.73) between calculated and experimental relative binding free energies.

Discovery of a High Affinity Adenosine A1/A3 Receptor Antagonist with a Novel 7-Amino-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyridazine Scaffold.

Here we describe the design and synthesis of pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyridazines as adenosine receptor (AR) ligands. We demonstrate that the introduction of a 3-phenyl group, together with a 7-benzylamino and 1-methyl group at the pyrazolopyridazine scaffold, generated the antagonist compound 10b, which displayed 21 nM affinity and a residence time of ∼60 min, for the human A1R, 55 nM affinity and a residence time of ∼73 min, for the human A3R and 1.7 µΜ affinity for the human A2BR while not being toxic. Strikingly, the 2-methyl analog of 10b, 15b, had no significant affinity. Docking calculations and molecular dynamics simulations of the ligands inside the orthosteric binding area suggested that the 2-methyl group in 15b hinders the formation of hydrogen bonding interactions with N6.55 which are considered critical for the stabilization inside the orthosteric binding cavity. We, therefore, demonstrate that 10a is a novel scaffold for the development of high affinity AR ligands. From the mutagenesis experiments the biggest effect was observed for the Y2717.46A mutation which caused an ∼10-fold reduction in the binding affinity of 10b.

Pharmacological characterisation of novel adenosine A3 receptor antagonists.

The adenosine A3 receptor (A3R) belongs to a family of four adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes which all play distinct roles throughout the body. A3R antagonists have been described as potential treatments for numerous diseases including asthma. Given the similarity between (adenosine receptors) orthosteric binding sites, obtaining highly selective antagonists is a challenging but critical task. Here we screen 39 potential A3R, antagonists using agonist-induced inhibition of cAMP. Positive hits were assessed for AR subtype selectivity through cAMP accumulation assays. The antagonist affinity was determined using Schild analysis (pA2 values) and fluorescent ligand binding. Structure-activity relationship investigations revealed that loss of the 3-(dichlorophenyl)-isoxazolyl moiety or the aromatic nitrogen heterocycle with nitrogen at α-position to the carbon of carboximidamide group significantly attenuated K18 antagonistic potency. Mutagenic studies supported by molecular dynamic simulations combined with Molecular Mechanics-Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area calculations identified the residues important for binding in the A3R orthosteric site. We demonstrate that K18, which contains a 3-(dichlorophenyl)-isoxazole group connected through carbonyloxycarboximidamide fragment with a 1,3-thiazole ring, is a specific A3R (< 1 µM) competitive antagonist. Finally, we introduce a model that enables estimates of the equilibrium binding affinity for rapidly disassociating compounds from real-time fluorescent ligand-binding studies. These results demonstrate the pharmacological characterisation of a selective competitive A3R antagonist and the description of its orthosteric binding mode. Our findings may provide new insights for drug discovery.

Insights to the Binding of a Selective Adenosine A3 Receptor Antagonist Using Molecular Dynamic Simulations, MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA Free Energy Calculations, and Mutagenesis.

Adenosine A3 receptor (A3R) is a promising drug target cancer and for a number of other conditions like inflammatory diseases, including asthma and rheumatoid arthritis, glaucoma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and ischemic injury. Currently, there is no experimentally determined structure of A3R. We explored the binding profile of O4-{[3-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-5-methylisoxazol-4-yl]carbonyl}-2-methyl-1,3-thiazole-4-carbohydroximamide (K18), which is a new specific and competitive antagonist at the orthosteric binding site of A3R. MD simulations and MM-GBSA calculations of the WT A3R in complex with K18 combined with in vitro mutagenic studies show that the most plausible binding conformation for the dichlorophenyl group of K18 is oriented toward trans-membrane helices (TM) 5, 6 and reveal important residues for binding. Further, MM-GBSA calculations distinguish mutations that reduce or maintain or increase antagonistic activity. Our studies show that selectivity of K18 toward A3R is defined not only by direct interactions with residues within the orthosteric binding area but also by remote residues playing a significant role. Although V1695.30 is considered to be a selectivity filter for A3R binders, when it was mutated to glutamic acid, K18 maintained antagonistic potency, in agreement with our previous results obtained for agonists binding profile investigation. Mutation of the direct interacting residue L903.32 in the low region and the remote L2647.35 in the middle/upper region to alanine increases antagonistic potency, suggesting an empty space in the orthosteric area available for increasing antagonist potency. These results approve the computational model for the description of K18 binding at A3R, which we previously performed for agonists binding to A3R, and the design of more effective antagonists based on K18.