Altered biomechanics in bilateral total knee replacement patients during stair negotiation.

BACKGROUND: Many total knee replacement (TKR) patients need to have a contralateral knee replacement. Biomechanical differences between first and second replaced limbs of bilateral TKR have not been examined during stair negotiation. Additionally, it is unknown whether hip and ankle biomechanics of bilateral patients are altered. We examined hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics of first and second replaced limbs bilateral patients, as well as replaced and non-replaced limbs of unilateral patients, during stair ascent and descent. METHODS: Eleven bilateral TKR patients (70.09 ± 5.41 years, 1.71 ± 0.08 m, 91.78 ± 13.00 kg) and 15 unilateral TKR patients (64.93 ± 5.11 years, 1.75 ± 0.09 m, 89.18 ± 17.55 kg) were recruited. Patients performed three to five trials of stair ascent and descent. The second step, during ascent, was the step of interest when analyzing each limb. A 2 × 2 (limb × group) analysis of variance was performed to determine differences between limbs and groups. RESULTS: During ascent, bilateral patients exhibited decreased peak loading-response knee extension (KEM) and push-off plantarflexion moments. Unilateral replaced limb KEM was lower than non-replaced limbs. During descent, bilateral patients descended the staircase significantly slower, had lower peak loading-response vertical ground reaction force and KEM, and push-off KEM. Bilateral patients had higher peak loading-response hip extension and push-off plantarflexion moments, and increased knee adduction ROM, compared with unilateral TKA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral patients exhibited similar hip, knee, and ankle joint moments between first and second replaced limbs. Substantial differences in hip, knee, and ankle biomechanics during stair negotiation in bilateral patients compared with unilateral patients may indicate a more complex adaptation strategy present in these patients.

Principal Component Analysis of Knee Joint Differences Between Bilateral and Unilateral Total Knee Replacement Patients During Level Walking.

Many unilateral total knee replacement (TKR) patients will need a contralateral TKR. Differences in knee joint biomechanics between bilateral patients and unilateral patients are not well established. The purpose of this study was to examine knee joint differences in level walking between bilateral and unilateral patients, and asymptomatic controls, using principal component analysis. Knee joints of 1st replaced limbs of 15 bilateral patients (69.40 ± 5.04 years), 15 replaced limbs of unilateral patients (66.47 ± 6.15 years), and 15 asymptomatic controls (63.53 ± 9.50 years) were analyzed during level walking. Principal component analysis examined knee joint sagittal- and frontal-plane kinematics and moments, and vertical ground reaction force (GRF). A one-way analysis of variance analyzed differences between principal component scores of each group. TKR patients exhibited more flexed and abducted knees throughout stance, decreased sagittal knee range of motion (ROM), increased early-stance adduction ROM, decreased loading-response knee extension and push-off knee flexion moments, decreased loading-response and push-off peak knee abduction moment (KAbM), increased KAbM at midstance, increased midstance vertical GRF, and decreased loading-response and push-off vertical GRF. Additionally, bilateral patients exhibited reduced sagittal knee ROM, increased adduction ROM, decreased sagittal knee moments throughout stance, decreased KAbM throughout stance, an earlier loading-response peak vertical GRF, and a decreased push-off vertical GRF, compared to unilateral patients. TKR patients, especially bilateral patients had stiff knee motion in the sagittal-plane, increased frontal-plane joint laxity, and a quadriceps avoidance gait.

Ground reaction force profiles during inclined running at iso-efficiency speeds.

While running provides an accessible form of cardiovascular stimulus, many runners report lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries. Additionally, runners who develop overuse injuries, such as tibial stress fractures, also have higher loading rates (LR) and impact forces. PURPOSE: Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how uphill treadmill running at iso-efficient speeds (IES; a speed-incline combination having the same metabolic intensity as level running) influences impact LR, and peak vertical ground reaction forces (GRF). METHODS: Eleven collegiate distance runners completed 3 experimental running conditions (0%, 4%, and 8% treadmill inclination). During each running condition, the metabolic intensity was controlled by implementing an IES for each runner. RESULTS: All variables of interest were significantly reduced as treadmill incline increased (0% > 4% > 8%). CONCLUSION: Incline running is more metabolically demanding compared to level running at the same speed. But, if speed is controlled to maintain metabolic output, runners could decrease LR and peak vertical GRF while achieving the same metabolic training stimulus as level running.

Influence of Total Knee Arthroplasty on Gait Mechanics of the Replaced and Non-Replaced Limb During Stair Negotiation.

This study compared biomechanics during stair ascent in replaced and non-replaced limbs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients with control limbs of healthy participants. Thirteen TKA patients and fifteen controls performed stair ascent. Replaced and non-replaced knees of TKA patients were less flexed at contact compared to controls. The loading response peak knee extension moment was greater in control and non-replaced knees compared with replaced. The push-off peak knee abduction moment was elevated in replaced limbs compared to controls. Loading and push-off peak hip abduction moments were greater in replaced limbs compared to controls. The push-off peak hip abduction moment was greater in non-replaced limbs compared to controls. Future rehabilitation protocols should consider the replaced knee and also the non-replaced knee and surrounding joints.

Stair ambulation biomechanics following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

The purpose of this review was to summarize the biomechanical adaptations during stair ambulation that occur after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Articles were identified by searching PubMed and Web of Science. During stair ascent, knee flexion angle at heel strike and walking velocity were reduced in TKA subjects compared to controls. Results of other variables were not consistent between studies. During stair descent only one study found any differences for knee moments in the sagittal and frontal plane between TKA subjects and controls. Other results during stair descent were not consistent between studies. Differences in methods can partially explain discrepancies between studies in this review. More studies with consistent and improved methods are needed in order to provide better understanding of stair ambulation following TKA.