Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 50: 744-747, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34879497

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The goal of our investigation was to describe the incidence of serious bacterial infection (SBI, defined as bacteremia, urinary tract infection (UTI), or meningitis) in young infants with and without documented viral pathogens. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study (1/2016-12/2017) in 3 emergency departments (EDs). Previously healthy 0-60-day-old infants were included if at least respiratory viral testing and a blood culture was obtained. The frequency of SBI, the primary outcome, was compared among infants with/without respiratory viral infections using the Pearson Chi-square test (or Fisher's Exact Test) and unadjusted odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: The median age of the 597-infant cohort was 32 days (interquartile range: 20-45 days); 42% were female. Eighty-three percent were well appearing in the ED and 72% were admitted. ED triage vitals commonly revealed tachypnea (68%), pyrexia (45%), and tachycardia (28%); hypoxemia (5%) was uncommon. Twenty-eight percent had positive viral testing, most commonly RSV (93/169, 55%), parainfluenza (29, 17%), and influenza A (23, 14%). Eighty-three infants (13.9%) had SBI: 8.4% (n = 50) had UTI alone, 2.8% (n = 17) had bacteremia alone, 1.2% (n = 7) had bacteremia + UTI, 1.0% (n = 6) had bacteremia + meningitis, and 0.5% (n = 3) had meningitis alone. Infants with documented respiratory viral pathogens were less likely to have any SBI (OR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.11-0.50), UTI (OR 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09-0.56), or bacteremia (OR 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08-0.9) than infants with negative viral testing. There was no difference in meningitis frequency based on viral status (OR: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.008-2.25). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of bacteremia and UTI was lower in young infants with respiratory viral infections compared to infants with negative respiratory viral testing.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Coinfecção/epidemiologia , Meningite/epidemiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologia , Viroses/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/virologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Coinfecção/diagnóstico , Coinfecção/virologia , Estudos Transversais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Meningite/diagnóstico , Meningite/virologia , Gravidade do Paciente , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Texas/epidemiologia , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/virologia , Viroses/diagnóstico
2.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 25(4): 475-486, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32589502

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Seizures are a common reason why emergency medical services (EMS) transports children by ambulance. Timely seizure cessation prevents neurologic morbidity, respiratory compromise, and mortality. Implementing recommendations from an evidence-based pediatric prehospital guideline may enhance timeliness of seizure cessation and optimize medication dosing. OBJECTIVE: We compared management of pediatric prehospital seizures across several EMS systems after protocol revision consistent with an evidence-based guideline. METHODS: Using a retrospective, cross-sectional approach, we evaluated actively seizing patients (0-17 years old) EMS transported to a hospital before and after modifying local protocols to include evidence-based recommendations for seizure management in three EMS agencies. We electronically queried and manually abstracted both EMS and hospital data at each site to obtain information about patient demographics, medications given, seizure cessation and recurrence, airway interventions, access obtained, and timeliness of care. The primary outcome of the study was the appropriate administration of midazolam based on route and dose. We analyzed these secondary outcomes: frequency of seizure activity upon emergency department (ED) arrival, frequency of respiratory failure, and timeliness of care. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 533 actively seizing patients. Paramedics were more likely to administer at least one dose of midazolam after the protocol updates [127/208 (61%) vs. 232/325 (71%), p = 0.01, OR = 1.60 (95% CI: 1.10-2.30)]. Paramedics were also more likely to administer the first midazolam dose via the preferred intranasal (IN) or intramuscular (IM) routes after the protocol change [(63/208 (49%) vs. 179/325 (77%), p < 0.001, OR = 3.24 (2.01-5.21)]. Overall, paramedics administered midazolam approximately 14 min after their arrival, gave an incorrect weight-based dose to 130/359 (36%) patients, and gave a lower than recommended dose to 94/130 (72%) patients. Upon ED arrival, 152/533 (29%) patients had a recurrent or persistent seizure. Respiratory failure during EMS care or subsequently in the ED occurred in 90/533 (17%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an evidence-based seizure protocol for EMS increased midazolam administration. Patients frequently received an incorrect weight-based dose. Future research should focus on optimizing administration of the correct dose of midazolam to improve seizure cessation.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Adolescente , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Estudos Retrospectivos , Convulsões/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...