Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 64(5): 496-506.e1, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25064741

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: For out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, authoritative, evidence-based recommendations have been made for regionalization of postarrest care. However, system-wide implementation of these guidelines has not been evaluated. Our hypothesis is that statewide regionalization of postarrest interventions, combined with emergency medical services (EMS) triage bypass, is associated with improved survival and neurologic outcome. METHODS: This was a prospective before-after observational study comparing patients admitted to cardiac receiving centers before implementation of the interventions ("before") versus those admitted after ("after"). In December 2007, the Arizona Department of Health Services began officially recognizing cardiac receiving centers according to commitment to provide specified postarrest care. Subsequently, the State EMS Council approved protocols allowing preferential EMS transport to these centers. Participants were adults (≥ 18 years) experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause who were transported to a cardiac receiving center. Interventions included (1) implementation of postarrest care at cardiac receiving centers focusing on provision of therapeutic hypothermia and coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions (catheterization/PCI); and (2) implementation of EMS bypass triage protocols. Main outcomes included discharged alive from the hospital and cerebral performance category score at discharge. RESULTS: During the study (December 1, 2007, to December 31, 2010), 31 hospitals were recognized as cardiac receiving centers statewide. Four hundred forty patients were transported to cardiac receiving centers before and 1,737 after. Provision of therapeutic hypothermia among patients with return of spontaneous circulation increased from 0% (before: 0/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0% to 2.5%) to 44.0% (after: 300/682; 95% CI 40.2, 47.8). The post return of spontaneous circulation catheterization PCI rate increased from 11.7% (17/145; 95% CI 7.0, 18.1) before to 30.7% (210/684; 95% CI 27.3, 34.3) after. All-rhythm survival increased from 8.9% (39/440) to 14.4% (250/1,734; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.22; 95% CI 1.47 to 3.34). Survival with favorable neurologic outcome (cerebral performance category score = 1 or 2) increased from 5.9% (26/439) to 8.9% (153/1,727; aOR = 2.26 [95% CI 1.37, 3.73]). For witnessed shockable rhythms, survival increased from 21.4% (21/98) to 39.2% (115/293; aOR = 2.96 [95% CI 1.63, 5.38]) and cerebral performance category score = 1 or 2 increased from 19.4% (19/98) to 29.8% (87/292; aOR = 2.12 [95% CI 1.14, 3.93]). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a statewide system of cardiac receiving centers and EMS bypass was independently associated with increased overall survival and favorable neurologic outcome. In addition, these outcomes improved among patients with witnessed shockable rhythms.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência/organização & administração , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arizona/epidemiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar/mortalidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Programas Médicos Regionais/organização & administração , Programas Médicos Regionais/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 64(5): 537-46, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24970245

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Acute HIV infection is a clinical diagnosis aided by technology. Detecting the highly infectious acute stage of HIV infection is critical to reducing transmission and improving long-term outcomes. The Maricopa Integrated Health System implemented nontargeted, opt-out HIV screening with a fourth-generation antigen/antibody combination HIV assay test in our adult emergency department (ED) at Maricopa Medical Center to assess the prevalence of both acute and chronic unrecognized HIV. METHODS: Eligible patients aged 18 to 64 years were tested for HIV if they did not opt out and had blood drawn as part of their ED care. Patients were not eligible if they had a known HIV or AIDS diagnosis, exhibited altered mental status, were a current resident of a long-term psychiatric or correctional facility, or prompted a trauma activation. Reactive test results were delivered by a physician with the assistance of a linkage-to-care specialist. Specimens with a reactive fourth-generation assay result underwent confirmatory testing. RESULTS: From July 11, 2011, through January 5, 2014, 27,952 HIV screenings were performed for 22,468 patients tested for HIV; 78 (0.28%) had new HIV diagnoses. Of those, 18 (23% of all new diagnoses) were acute HIV infections, and 22 patients (28%) had a CD4 count of less than 200 cells/mL, or an opportunistic infection. CONCLUSION: HIV testing with a fourth-generation antigen/antibody laboratory test producing rapid results is feasible in an ED. Unexpectedly, nearly one fourth of patients with undiagnosed HIV had acute infections, which would have been more difficult to detect with previous testing technology.


Assuntos
Sorodiagnóstico da AIDS/métodos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Sorodiagnóstico da AIDS/estatística & dados numéricos , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Arizona/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
JAMA ; 304(13): 1447-54, 2010 Oct 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20924010

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Chest compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be as effective as conventional CPR with rescue breathing for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the survival of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using compression-only CPR (COCPR) compared with conventional CPR. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A 5-year prospective observational cohort study of survival in patients at least 18 years old with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009, in Arizona. The relationship between layperson bystander CPR and survival to hospital discharge was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: Among 5272 adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of cardiac etiology not observed by responding emergency medical personnel, 779 were excluded because bystander CPR was provided by a health care professional or the arrest occurred in a medical facility. A total of 4415 met all inclusion criteria for analysis, including 2900 who received no bystander CPR, 666 who received conventional CPR, and 849 who received COCPR. Rates of survival to hospital discharge were 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%-6.0%) for the no bystander CPR group, 7.8% (95% CI, 5.8%-9.8%) for conventional CPR, and 13.3% (95% CI, 11.0%-15.6%) for COCPR. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for survival for conventional CPR vs no CPR was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.69-1.43), for COCPR vs no CPR, 1.59 (95% CI, 1.18-2.13), and for COCPR vs conventional CPR, 1.60 (95% CI, 1.08-2.35). From 2005 to 2009, lay rescuer CPR increased from 28.2% (95% CI, 24.6%-31.8%) to 39.9% (95% CI, 36.8%-42.9%; P < .001); the proportion of CPR that was COCPR increased from 19.6% (95% CI, 13.6%-25.7%) to 75.9% (95% CI, 71.7%-80.1%; P < .001). Overall survival increased from 3.7% (95% CI, 2.2%-5.2%) to 9.8% (95% CI, 8.0%-11.6%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, layperson compression-only CPR was associated with increased survival compared with conventional CPR and no bystander CPR in this setting with public endorsement of chest compression-only CPR.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Parada Cardíaca/mortalidade , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Arizona/epidemiologia , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Cuidadores , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Análise de Regressão , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 28(5): 561-7, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20579550

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound guidance of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion improves success rates and reduces complications and is recommended by several professional and regulatory organizations. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study using data extracted from the Central Line Emergency Access Registry database, a multicenter online registry of CVC insertions from medical centers throughout the United States. We compared success rates with ultrasound and with the anatomic-landmark technique. RESULTS: A total of 1250 CVC placement attempts by emergency medicine residents during the study period were selected from the Central Line Emergency Access Registry database. Because a few attempts (n = 28) were made to place lines in either the left or right supraclavicular locations, data on these attempts were eliminated from the analysis. A total of 1222 CVC attempts from 5 institutions were analyzed. Successful placement on the first attempt occurred in 1161 (86%) cases and varied according to anatomic location. Ultrasound guidance was used in 478 (41%) of the initial attempts. The remainder of placements were presumably placed using the anatomic-landmark technique based on visible surface and palpatory subcutaneous structures. Overall successful placement rate did not vary according to the use of ultrasound guidance, nor did it vary at different anatomic sites. However, ultrasound was found to be significant for reducing the total number of punctures per attempt (P < .02, t = 2.30). CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not observe improved success with the use of ultrasound for CVC cannulation on the first attempt, but we did observe a reduced number of total punctures per attempt.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Tratamento de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Ultrassonografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...