Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. Key elements in structured histopathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens.

Prostate cancer is the most common visceral cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death in males. The number of radical prostatectomies performed each year is increasing and accurate data from the histopathological examination of these specimens aid clinicians in stratifying patients for surveillance and adjuvant therapies. This review focuses on the histopathological prognostic factors which should be routinely recorded in pathology reports and complements the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Structured Reporting Protocol for Prostate Cancer (Radical Prostatectomy). Such structured pathology reports have been shown to significantly enhance the completeness and quality of data provided to clinicians. The review also discusses the International Society for Urological Pathology Consensus Conference recommendations which were published recently.

The rs10993994 risk allele for prostate cancer results in clinically relevant changes in microseminoprotein-beta expression in tissue and urine.

BACKGROUND: Microseminoprotein-beta (MSMB) regulates apoptosis and using genome-wide association studies the rs10993994 single nucleotide polymorphism in the MSMB promoter has been linked to an increased risk of developing prostate cancer. The promoter location of the risk allele, and its ability to reduce promoter activity, suggested that the rs10993994 risk allele could result in lowered MSMB in benign tissue leading to increased prostate cancer risk. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: MSMB expression in benign and malignant prostate tissue was examined using immunohistochemistry and compared with the rs10993994 genotype. Urinary MSMB concentrations were determined by ELISA and correlated with urinary PSA, the presence or absence of cancer, rs10993994 genotype and age of onset. MSMB levels in prostate tissue and urine were greatly reduced with tumourigenesis. Urinary MSMB was better than urinary PSA at differentiating men with prostate cancer at all Gleason grades. The high risk allele was associated with heterogeneity of MSMB staining and loss of MSMB in both tissue and urine in benign prostate. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that some high risk alleles discovered using genome-wide association studies produce phenotypic effects with potential clinical utility. We provide the first link between a low penetrance polymorphism for prostate cancer and a potential test in human tissue and bodily fluids. There is potential to develop tissue and urinary MSMB for a biomarker of prostate cancer risk, diagnosis and disease monitoring.

Co-expression of the androgen receptor and the transcription factor ZNF652 is related to prostate cancer outcome.

ZNF652, a DNA binding transcription factor, was previously suggested to be differentially expressed in prostate cancer. This study investigated if the expressions of ZNF652 and androgen receptor (AR) in prostate cancer are associated with prostate specific antigen (PSA) defined relapse. ZNF652 and AR immunoreactivity were evaluated in prostate tissues from a cohort of 121 patients with prostate cancer and associations with disease outcome determined. To assess if ZNF652 can influence AR expression, or vice versa, levels of expression of ZNF652, AR and PSA were determined in the prostate cell line LNCaP following induction of AR activity by 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone, or knockdown of ZNF652 expression. Two thirds of prostate tumors retained high levels of ZNF652 (71/109 cases) and 50% of tumors high levels of AR (57/113). There was a significant decrease (p=0.005) in relapse-free survival of patients with high expression levels of both ZNF652 and AR and this was independent of preoperative PSA and seminal vesicle involvement. Modulation of either AR or ZNF652 expression levels in LNCaP cells was not associated with any corresponding changes to the levels of either ZNF652 or AR, respectively. High levels of expression of both AR and ZNF652 in clinically organ-defined prostate cancer are associated with a statistically increased risk of relapse. The ZNF652 and AR transcription factors are acting independently and it is proposed that the continued maintenance of expression of ZNF652 in AR positive cells results in a gene expression pattern that contributes to the relapse.

Abnormal PSA tests--delays in referral.

BACKGROUND: The main benefit of prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing is to help detect prostate cancer at an early, curable stage. Delays between the first abnormal PSA test and biopsy can undermine that benefit, but have not yet been studied. We investigated delays before biopsy together with associated PSA increases as an indicator of disease progression. METHODS: We identified 241 patients with a primary care referral because of an elevated PSA result (>4 ng/mL) and no previous prostate biopsy. Prostate specific antigen results and intervals between PSA testing, specialist clinic referral, appointment and biopsy were stratified by age. RESULTS: Median times between first abnormal PSA, referral, consultation and biopsy were modest but associated with increases in PSA. Extended delays (>20 months) between first abnormal PSA and referral occurred in 25% of younger men. A PSA result less than 10 ng/mL was the best predictor of a delay to refer. DISCUSSION: Rising PSA and possible cancer progression during investigation for prostate cancer suggest that prompt care is advisable.

Evidence that unsaturated fatty acids are potent inhibitors of renal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT): kinetic studies using human kidney cortical microsomes and recombinant UGT1A9 and UGT2B7.

Renal ischaemia is associated with accumulation of fatty acids (FA) and mobilisation of arachidonic acid (AA). Given the capacity of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) isoforms to metabolise both drugs and FA, we hypothesised that FA would inhibit renal drug glucuronidation. The effect of FA (C2:0-C20:5) on 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) glucuronidation was investigated using human kidney cortical microsomes (HKCM) and recombinant UGT1A9 and UGT2B7 as the enzyme sources. 4-MU glucuronidation exhibited Michaelis-Menten kinetics with HKCM (apparent K(m) (K(m)(app)) 20.3 microM), weak substrate inhibition with UGT1A9 (K(m)(app) 10.2 microM, K(si) 289.6 microM), and sigmoid kinetics with UGT2B7 (S(50)(app)440.6 microM) Similarly, biphasic UDP-glucuronic acid (UDPGA) kinetics were observed with HKCM (S(50) 354.3 microM) and UGT1A9 (S(50) 88.2 microM). In contrast, the Michaelis-Menten kinetics for UDPGA observed with UGT2B7 (K(m)(app) 493.2 microM) suggested that kinetic interactions with UGTs were specific to the xenobiotic substrate and the co-substrate (UDPGA). FA (C16:1-C20:5) significantly inhibited (25-93%) HKCM, UGT1A9 or UGT2B7 catalysed 4-MU glucuronidation. Although linoleic acid (LA) and AA were both competitive inhibitors of 4-MU glucuronidation by HKCM (K(i)(app) 6.34 and 0.15 microM, respectively), only LA was a competitive inhibitor of UGT1A9 (K(i)(app) 4.06 microM). In contrast, inhibition of UGT1A9 by AA exhibited atypical kinetics. These data indicate that LA and AA are potent inhibitors of 4-MU glucuronidation catalysed by human kidney UGTs and recombinant UGT1A9 and UGT2B7. It is conceivable therefore that during periods of renal ischaemia FA may impair renal drug glucuronidation thus compromising the protective capacity of the kidney against drug-induced nephrotoxicity.

Coping with prostate cancer: a quantitative analysis using a new instrument, the centre for clinical excellence in urological research coping with cancer instrument.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability (internal and interrater) and validity (concurrent) of a new interview measure for assessing patients' ability to cope with cancer, the Centre for Clinical Excellence in Urological Research Coping with Cancer Instrument (CCCI), and to determine whether there is an underlying structure to the various coping strategies used by patients with prostate cancer. METHODS: Eighty patients with prostate cancer were interviewed using the CCCI. The participants also completed measures of quality of life and anxiety and depression. RESULTS: The psychometric properties of the CCCI were acceptable. Factor analysis revealed that coping with prostate cancer can be described along five dimensions: positive problem solving (fighting against the illness, seeking information); self-reliance (developing a lay explanation, distrusting doctors); emotional availability (not withdrawing from others); distress (brooding, self-pity); and solace (taking alcohol or drugs to improve mood). These coping styles were correlated with age, quality of life, self-reported prostate-specific antigen level, and measures of anxiety and depression. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study have led to a greater understanding of the underlying coping styles used by patients with prostate cancer. Although some of these are similar to those found in other cancer populations, others, such as self-reliance and solace, represent unique and potentially clinically significant responses to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. A larger scale longitudinal study is needed to determine the wider clinical implications associated with each coping style.