Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health ; 48(1): 9-16, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26841331

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Understanding the nature of rural-urban variation in U.S. family planning services would help address disparities in unmet contraceptive need. METHODS: In 2012, some 558 Title X-supported clinics in 16 Great Plains and Midwestern states were surveyed. Rural-urban commuting area (RUCA) codes were used to categorize clinic locations as urban, large rural city, small rural town or isolated small rural town. Bivariate analyses examined key domains of service provision by RUCA category and clinic type. RESULTS: The proportion of clinics offering walk-in appointments was lower in isolated small rural towns (47%) than in the other RUCA categories (67-73%). Results were similar for sites that do not specialize in family planning or reproductive health, but no variation was seen among specialty clinics. Overall, availability of evening or weekend appointments varied in a linear fashion, falling from 73% in urban areas to 29% in isolated small rural towns. On-site provision of most hormonal methods was most common in urban areas and least common in isolated small rural towns, while provision of nonhormonal methods was similar across RUCA categories. Sixty percent of clinics provided IUDs or implants. For clinics that did not, the only barriers that varied geographically were low IUD demand and lack of trained IUD providers; these barriers were most common in isolated rural towns (42% and 70%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While important characteristics, such as clinics' specialization (or lack thereof), are linked to the provision of family planning services, geographic disparities exist.


Assuntos
Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Inquéritos sobre o Uso de Métodos Contraceptivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/organização & administração , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Urbanos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Womens Health Issues ; 25(6): 622-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26253826

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine rural/urban differences in postpartum contraceptive use, which are underexplored in the literature. METHODS: We analyzed phase 5 (2004-2008) of the Michigan Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Using Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes and weighted multinomial logistic regression, we examined the association between self-reported postpartum contraceptive method and rural/urban residence among postpartum women not desiring pregnancy (n = 6,468). RESULTS: Postpartum (mean, 16.5 weeks after delivery), 14.4% of respondents were using sterilization, 6.7% long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), 37.3% moderately effective hormonal methods, 38.4% less effective methods or no method, and 3.2% abstinence. Multivariable analysis yielded sporadic geographic patterns. Odds of method use varied significantly by age, parity, body mass index, and breastfeeding status. Not discussing contraception with a prenatal healthcare provider decreased odds of postpartum LARC use (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36-0.75). Number of prenatal visits and weeks since delivery were not associated with postpartum contraception method. CONCLUSIONS: We did not observe strong variation in postpartum contraceptive use based on geography. Low uptake of highly effective contraception across rural and urban areas suggests a need for education and outreach regarding these methods.


Assuntos
Comportamento Contraceptivo/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepção/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Pós-Parto , Adulto , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/uso terapêutico , Dispositivos Anticoncepcionais Femininos/estatística & dados numéricos , Anticoncepcionais Orais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estatística & dados numéricos , Modelos Logísticos , Michigan , Gravidez , Medição de Risco , População Rural , Esterilização Reprodutiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , População Urbana
3.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 24(1): 26-9, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14676530

RESUMO

The presence of three of four continuous cortices on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs has been stated to be an indication of bony healing of distraction osteogenesis. In this study the authors assessed the level of agreement of radiographic assessment of bony union. Forty-two lower extremity radiographs of consolidating distraction gaps were reviewed by nine examiners on two occasions for number of cortices and whether fixator removal was indicated. For number of cortices, the kappa coefficients for interobserver and intraobserver variability were 0.127 and 0.290. For fixator removal, the interobserver and intraobserver coefficients were 0.352 and 0.461. Variation in assessment of number of cortices was slightly better than chance, indicating an inadequate measure of healing. The clinicians used radiographic criteria other than three of four cortices for fixator removal. The decision to remove an external fixation device based on radiographic assessment alone resulted in intraobserver and interobserver variability moderately above chance.


Assuntos
Osteogênese por Distração , Remoção de Dispositivo , Fixadores Externos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...