Comprehensive analysis of frequency and phenotype of T regulatory cells in HIV infection: CD39 expression of FoxP3+ T regulatory cells correlates with progressive disease.

There are conflicting data about the frequency and role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) during the course of HIV infection. Peripheral blood of a large cohort of HIV-infected patients (n = 131) at different stages of disease, including 15 long-term nonprogressors and 21 elite controllers, was analyzed to determine the frequency and phenotype of Tregs, defined as CD4(+), CD25(high), CD127(low), FoxP3(high) cells. A significantly increased relative frequency of Tregs within the CD4(+) compartment of HIV(+) patients compared to that of healthy controls (P < 0.0001) was observed. Additionally, the relative frequency of Tregs directly correlated with HIV viral load and inversely with CD4(+) counts. However, the absolute Treg number was reduced in HIV-infected patients versus healthy controls (P < 0.0001), with the exception of elite controllers (P > 0.05). The loss of absolute Treg numbers coincided with rising markers of immune activation (P < 0.0006). The initiation of antiviral therapy significantly increased absolute Treg numbers (P < 0.0031). We find that the expression of CD39, a newly defined ectonucleotidase with immunomodulatory functions on Tregs, correlated with progressive HIV disease, HIV viral load, and immune activation. Of note, when tested in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy volunteers, the in vitro capacity to suppress T-cell proliferation was limited to CD4(+), CD25(high), CD39(+) T cells. Interestingly, Tregs of elite controllers exhibited not only the highest expression of CCR5, CTLA-4, and ICOS but also the lowest level of CD39. The data presented here reconcile the seemingly contradictory results of previous studies looking at Tregs in HIV and highlight the complexity of Treg-mediated immunoregulation during human viral infections.

Prevalence- and gender-specific immune response to opportunistic infections in HIV-infected patients in Lesotho.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the seroprevalence of coinfecting viruses and Treponema pallidum (T. pallidum) in a cohort of 205 antiretrovirally treated HIV-infected individuals (152 females and 53 males, aged: 19-71 years) in rural Lesotho. Furthermore agent-specific immune responses were investigated by analyzing antibody titers against herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) and against T. pallidum. METHODS: Serum samples were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies against HSV-2, cytomegalovirus, hepatitis A, B, and C viruses, and T. pallidum. RESULTS: Seroprevalences (95% confidence intervals) were found to be 100% (98.5%-100%) for anti-cytomegalovirus, 98.5% (95.7%-99.7%) for anti-hepatitis A virus, 35.5% (28.9%-42.6%) for anti-HBc, 5.5% (2.8%-9.6%) for hepatitis B surface antigen, and 0.5% (0.0%-2.8%) for anti-hepatitis C virus. Only 78.5% (72.2%-84.0%) were anti-HSV-2 positive and 29.0% (22.8%-35.8%) had antibodies against T. pallidum. Only anti-HSV-2 titers showed gender- and CD4 cell-count dependent differences: females with >500 CD4 cells/microL had an average anti-HSV-2 titer of 446 compared with males of 398 AU/mL (not significant), but in those with 250 to 500 CD4 cells/microL, there was a significant difference with a mean titer of 467 compared to 302 AU/mL in males (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A high seroprevalence of CMV, HAV, and HBV was found in both genders. One-third of the patients had been exposed to HBV and T. pallidum. The generally high HSV-2 prevalence showed gender- and CD4 cell count-dependent differences in HSV-2 antibody titer.

Triple-class virologic failure in HIV-infected patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy for up to 10 years.

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy of people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is now estimated to approach that of the general population in some successfully treated subgroups. However, to attain these life expectancies, viral suppression must be maintained for decades. METHODS: We studied the rate of triple-class virologic failure (TCVF) in patients within the Collaboration of Observational HIV Epidemiological Research Europe (COHERE) who started antiretroviral therapy (ART) that included a nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) from 1998 onwards. We also focused on TCVF in patients who started a PI/r-containing regimen after a first-line NNRTI-containing regimen failed. RESULTS: Of 45 937 patients followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 3.0 (1.5-5.0) years, 980 developed TCVF (2.1%). By 5 and 9 years after starting ART, an estimated 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1%-3.6%) and 8.6% (95% CI, 7.5%-9.8%) of patients, respectively, had developed TCVF. The incidence of TCVF rose during the first 3 to 4 years on ART but plateaued thereafter. There was no significant difference in the risk of TCVF according to whether the initial regimen was NNRTI or PI/r based (P = .11). By 5 years after starting a PI/r regimen as second-line therapy, 46% of patients had developed TCVF. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of virologic failure of the 3 original drug classes is low, but not negligible, and does not appear to diminish over time from starting ART. If this trend continues, many patients are likely to need newer drugs to maintain viral suppression. The rate of TCVF from the start of a PI/r regimen after NNRTI failure provides a comparator for studies of response to second-line regimens in resource-limited settings.

Activity, pharmacokinetics and safety of lersivirine (UK-453,061), a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, during 7-day monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects on viral load and assess dose-response relationships, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of lersivirine (UK-453,061), a next-generation nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in asymptomatic HIV-1-infected patients. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase IIa clinical study. METHODS: Forty-eight HIV-1-infected patients were enrolled for the study of once-daily or twice-daily lersivirine at total daily doses ranging from 20 to 1000 mg. The primary endpoint was the change in log10 plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load from baseline to day 8. Secondary endpoints related to pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability and potential development of viral resistance and genotyping patterns. RESULTS: Patients treated with lersivirine achieved day 8 mean viral load reductions of 0.3, 0.8, 1.3 and 1.6 log10 after receiving 10, 30, 100 and 500 mg twice daily, respectively, and 0.9, 1.7 and 1.8 log10 after receiving 100, 500 and 750 mg once daily, respectively. Mean changes from baseline to day 8 were small in patients receiving placebo. For all dose regimens, plasma exposure increased approximately in line with lersivirine dose. Median plasma concentrations of lersivirine at steady state were above the IC90 for lersivirine at once-daily doses of at least 500 mg and twice-daily doses of at least 100 mg. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were headache, fatigue and nausea. CONCLUSION: Seven-day monotherapy with lersivirine achieved mean viral load reductions up to 1.8 log10. Lersivirine was safe and well tolerated. Further studies of lersivirine in combination with other antiretroviral drugs to assess long-term durability of antiviral response, safety and tolerability are warranted.

Effect of baseline CD4 cell counts on the clinical significance of short-term immunologic response to antiretroviral therapy in individuals with virologic suppression.

BACKGROUND: Achieving virologic suppression is a clear therapeutic goal for patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). However, the effects of immunologic responses, whether measured as CD4 count changes from baseline or CD4 counts at follow-up, in patients with virologic suppression, have not been clearly established. METHODS: Treatment-naive individuals aged > or =16 years, who initiated cART between 1998 and 2005 in participating cohorts of the ART Cohort Collaboration and achieved viral load < or =400 copies per milliliter 6 months after cART initiation, were included. We used Cox models to examine associations of CD4 change from baseline to 6 months, and absolute CD4 counts at 6 months, with subsequent rates of mortality and AIDS. Analyses were stratified by baseline CD4 count. RESULTS: Among 23,679 eligible participants, the median increase in CD4 count at 6 months, and the implications of these increases for subsequent mortality and AIDS, varied with baseline CD4 count. Mortality hazard ratios for increases of 0-50 cells per microliter, compared with >100 cells per microliter, were 1.87 (95% confidence interval: 1.28 to 2.73), 1.60 (1.13 to 2.28), 0.98 (0.58 to 1.65) and 1.24 (0.70 to 2.18) in participants with baseline CD4 cell count <50, 50-199, 200-349 and > or =350 cells per microliter, respectively. In contrast, hazard ratios for mortality or AIDS associated with absolute CD4 cell counts at 6 months were similar across all but the highest baseline CD4 cell count strata. CONCLUSION: It is not possible to derive thresholds for change in CD4 count that define an adequate immunologic response in individuals receiving cART. Absolute CD4 counts at 6 months are a more useful measure of immunologic response and subsequent prognosis.

Quadruple nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors-only regimen of tenofovir plus zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir in heavily pre-treated HIV-1 infected patients: salvage therapy or backbone only?

BACKGROUND: We investigated the virologic and immunologic responses to a mono-class, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor - combination therapy consisting of tenofovir and zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir in therapy experienced patients. METHODS: Retrospective study of 122 patients. Primary analysis was performed at 48 weeks. Virologic response was defined as viral load levels less than 400 copies/ml. RESULTS: About half of the patients had switched to tenofovir+ zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir for simplification purposes or toxicity while the other half had experienced virologic failure. 80/122 (66%) responded. Median viral load decreased to 78 copies/ml at week 48; median CD4 count increased to 321 cells/mm(3). Of the 42 virologic failures, only 3 patients failed after week 24. 24/35 patients who had been on a non-suppressive zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir-only regimen at baseline and added tenofovir to intensify, responded. 41/53 patients who switched from any nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-only regimen improved or maintained suppression. Genotypes were available for 85/122 patients. The only predictor of virologic failure was the combination 41L+210W+215Y/F mutational pattern. 16 of the patients who failed on tenofovir+ zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir therapy selected new primary nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutations that they previously did not have. 48/85 (56%) patients with genotype tests had at least 3 (3-10; median 4) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance-associated mutations in the past. CONCLUSIONS: Patients heavily pre-treated with nucleoside analogues may show response to mono-class tenofovir+ zidovudine/lamivudine/abacavir therapy despite having a history of failure with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Lower baseline viral load, higher baseline CD4 count were significant predictors for response. Archived 41L+210W+215Y/F mutational pattern was significantly associated with non-response.

Timing of initiation of antiretroviral therapy in AIDS-free HIV-1-infected patients: a collaborative analysis of 18 HIV cohort studies.

BACKGROUND: The CD4 cell count at which combination antiretroviral therapy should be started is a central, unresolved issue in the care of HIV-1-infected patients. In the absence of randomised trials, we examined this question in prospective cohort studies. METHODS: We analysed data from 18 cohort studies of patients with HIV. Antiretroviral-naive patients from 15 of these studies were eligible for inclusion if they had started combination antiretroviral therapy (while AIDS-free, with a CD4 cell count less than 550 cells per microL, and with no history of injecting drug use) on or after Jan 1, 1998. We used data from patients followed up in seven of the cohorts in the era before the introduction of combination therapy (1989-95) to estimate distributions of lead times (from the first CD4 cell count measurement in an upper range to the upper threshold of a lower range) and unseen AIDS and death events (occurring before the upper threshold of a lower CD4 cell count range is reached) in the absence of treatment. These estimations were used to impute completed datasets in which lead times and unseen AIDS and death events were added to data for treated patients in deferred therapy groups. We compared the effect of deferred initiation of combination therapy with immediate initiation on rates of AIDS and death, and on death alone, in adjacent CD4 cell count ranges of width 100 cells per microL. FINDINGS: Data were obtained for 21 247 patients who were followed up during the era before the introduction of combination therapy and 24 444 patients who were followed up from the start of treatment. Deferring combination therapy until a CD4 cell count of 251-350 cells per microL was associated with higher rates of AIDS and death than starting therapy in the range 351-450 cells per microL (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.57). The adverse effect of deferring treatment increased with decreasing CD4 cell count threshold. Deferred initiation of combination therapy was also associated with higher mortality rates, although effects on mortality were less marked than effects on AIDS and death (HR 1.13, 0.80-1.60, for deferred initiation of treatment at CD4 cell count 251-350 cells per microL compared with initiation at 351-450 cells per microL). INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that 350 cells per microL should be the minimum threshold for initiation of antiretroviral therapy, and should help to guide physicians and patients in deciding when to start treatment.

Variable impact on mortality of AIDS-defining events diagnosed during combination antiretroviral therapy: not all AIDS-defining conditions are created equal.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which mortality differs following individual acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining events (ADEs) has not been assessed among patients initiating combination antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: We analyzed data from 31,620 patients with no prior ADEs who started combination antiretroviral therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate mortality hazard ratios for each ADE that occurred in >50 patients, after stratification by cohort and adjustment for sex, HIV transmission group, number of antiretroviral drugs initiated, regimen, age, date of starting combination antiretroviral therapy, and CD4+ cell count and HIV RNA load at initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy. ADEs that occurred in <50 patients were grouped together to form a "rare ADEs" category. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 43 months (interquartile range, 19-70 months), 2880 ADEs were diagnosed in 2262 patients; 1146 patients died. The most common ADEs were esophageal candidiasis (in 360 patients), Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (320 patients), and Kaposi sarcoma (308 patients). The greatest mortality hazard ratio was associated with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (hazard ratio, 17.59; 95% confidence interval, 13.84-22.35) and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (hazard ratio, 10.0; 95% confidence interval, 6.70-14.92). Three groups of ADEs were identified on the basis of the ranked hazard ratios with bootstrapped confidence intervals: severe (non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy [hazard ratio, 7.26; 95% confidence interval, 5.55-9.48]), moderate (cryptococcosis, cerebral toxoplasmosis, AIDS dementia complex, disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex, and rare ADEs [hazard ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.76-3.13]), and mild (all other ADEs [hazard ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.00]). CONCLUSIONS: In the combination antiretroviral therapy era, mortality rates subsequent to an ADE depend on the specific diagnosis. The proposed classification of ADEs may be useful in clinical end point trials, prognostic studies, and patient management.

Determinants of virological failure after successful viral load suppression in first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the long-term virological outcomes of a cohort initially showing good responses to first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) with no evidence ofvirological failure during the first year after achieving viral load (VL) undetectability (<50 copies/ml). METHODS: Virological failure was defined as a confirmed VL >400 copies/ml or a single VL >400 copies/ml followed by a treatment change or end of follow-up. Risk factors for low-level VL rebound (50-400 copies/ml) in the first year after achieving undetectability and for virological failure during subsequent follow-up were investigated by logistic and Poisson regression. RESULTS: In the first year after achieving VL undetectability, 354/1386 (25.5%) patients experienced low-level VL rebound, the remaining patients maintained consistent undetectability. Low-level rebound occurred less commonly with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based HAART than with other regimens (P = 0.01). Over median 2.2 (range 0.0-7.4) years of subsequent follow-up, 86 (6.2%) patients experienced virological failure, corresponding to 2.30 failures per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-2.79). Independent predictors of virological failure included low-level rebound during the first year after achieving undetectability relative to consistent undetectability (rate ratio [RR] 2.18, 95%0 CI 1.15-4.10), female gender (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.12-2.85) and receiving a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (Pl/r) relative to NNRTI-based HAART (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.02-3.46). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on first-line HAART who maintain consistent VL undetectability for 1 year have a low risk of subsequent virological failure. A subset might benefit from targeted interventions, including women and patients on Pl/r-based HAART.

Short communication: Different mutation patterns in subtype CRF06_cpx after mother-to-child transmission.

Abstract Development of drug resistance mutation patterns (DRMP) in HIV after treatment failure depends on the drugs used in the failing regimen. However, selected patterns may not be unique; there is evidence that selection of DRMP for nelfinavir is dependent on subtype and/or background polymorphisms. Here we describe the selection of DRMP in a mother and son infected with subtype CRF06_cpx by mother-to-child transmission. Four years after delivery the mother received stavudine/lamivudine/nelfinavir as first-line therapy. Genotypic resistance tests (GRT) during follow-up showed selection of M184V/L283I in reverse transcriptase (RT) and H63Q/A71V/L90M in protease (PR). The child started treatment 8 months after birth with stavudine/didanosine/nelfinavir followed by an intensification period with efavirenz. Due to toxicity, efavirenz was removed from the regimen again. GRT during follow-up showed selection of L74V/K103N/M184V/M230L in RT and M46I/H63Q/N88S in PR. The viral load (VL) of the mother was initially undetectable followed by intermediate replication (1000-21,000 copies/ml), whereas the child had both periods of undetectable VL and low-level replication. Although both patients were infected with the same virus and treated with the same protease inhibitor, different DRMPs were selected. Whether the nucleoside backbone, course of antiretroviral therapy, or different host environment is responsible for this variability must be determined in larger studies.

Comparing QuantiFERON-tuberculosis gold, T-SPOT tuberculosis and tuberculin skin test in HIV-infected individuals from a low prevalence tuberculosis country.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the interferon-gamma-releasing assays QuantiFERON-tuberculosis (TB) Gold and T-SPOT.TB in addition to tuberculin skin test (TST) for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in HIV patients. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cross-sectional study for asymptomatic HIV-infected outpatients from a large University hospital. INTERVENTION: Simultaneous performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold, T-SPOT.TB and TST. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and risk factors for a positive test reaction and the concordance (kappa) between the tests were investigated. RESULTS: Of 286 enrolled patients, 81% were men; median age was 44 years, the median CD4 cell count 408/microl (range 7-1510) with a median nadir of 126/microl (range 0-749). A number of patients (63.8%) had undetectable HIV RNA (<50 copies/ml). Both T-SPOT.TB and QuantiFERON-TB showed more positive test results than TST: 25.2 and 20.0% (P = 0.133) compared with 12.8% (P < 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Agreement between T-SPOT.TB and TST (kappa = 0.201) respectively QuantiFERON-TB and TST (kappa = 0.335) was fair, but only poor between the serological assays (kappa = 0.146). T-SPOT.TB provided more indeterminate results than QuantiFERON-TB (8 vs. 1/256, P < 0.01). Patients with a positive QuantiFERON-TB result had higher median CD4 cell counts (457 vs. 405 cells/microl for patients with negative result, P = 0.044); the amount of released interferon-gamma correlated with CD4 cell counts (rho = 0.199; P < 0.002). T-SPOT.TB results were independent from CD4 cell counts. CONCLUSION: In HIV-infected patients from a low prevalence TB country, both interferon-gamma assays are more sensitive than TST, but seem to be less sensitive than in immunocompetent patients. The blood tests show poor agreement and differ in their dependence on the CD4 cell count.

Does short-term virologic failure translate to clinical events in antiretroviral-naïve patients initiating antiretroviral therapy in clinical practice?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether differences in short-term virologic failure among commonly used antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens translate to differences in clinical events in antiretroviral-naïve patients initiating ART. DESIGN: Observational cohort study of patients initiating ART between January 2000 and December 2005. SETTING: The Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration (ART-CC) is a collaboration of 15 HIV cohort studies from Canada, Europe, and the United States. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A total of 13 546 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-positive patients initiating ART with efavirenz, nevirapine, lopinavir/ritonavir, nelfinavir, or abacavir as third drugs in combination with a zidovudine and lamivudine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term (24-week) virologic failure (>500 copies/ml) and clinical events within 2 years of ART initiation (incident AIDS-defining event, death, and a composite measure of these two outcomes). RESULTS: Compared with efavirenz as initial third drug, short-term virologic failure was more common with all other third drugs evaluated; nevirapine (adjusted odds ratio = 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.58-2.22), lopinavir/ritonavir (1.32, 95% CI = 1.12-1.57), nelfinavir (3.20, 95% CI = 2.74-3.74), and abacavir (2.13, 95% CI = 1.82-2.50). However, the rate of clinical events within 2 years of ART initiation appeared higher only with nevirapine (adjusted hazard ratio for composite outcome measure 1.27, 95% CI = 1.04-1.56) and abacavir (1.22, 95% CI = 1.00-1.48). CONCLUSION: Among antiretroviral-naïve patients initiating therapy, between-ART regimen, differences in short-term virologic failure do not necessarily translate to differences in clinical outcomes. Our results should be interpreted with caution because of the possibility of residual confounding by indication.

Platelet-leucocyte adhesion markers before and after the initiation of antiretroviral therapy with HIV protease inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Thromboembolic complications under antiretroviral therapy (ART) have been described in the past. In particular, the influence of protease inhibitors (PIs) on platelet activation and coagulation is currently under discussion. METHODS: HIV-1-infected, PI-naive adults (n = 18) were investigated before and 4 weeks after the start of the ART, consisting either of boosted PI regimens (n = 13) plus reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) or a double PI regimen (n = 5) without RTI co-medication. Administered PIs were saquinavir (n = 15), lopinavir (n = 4), fosamprenavir (n = 2) and atazanavir (n = 2). Platelet CD62P, CD40L (%+ cells) and PAC-1 binding [mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)] as well as monocyte CD11b (MFI) and monocyte-associated CD41 (%+ cells and MFI) expression were assessed by flow cytometry with or without platelet stimulation. To investigate the influence of platelets on coagulation, the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) [render fluorescence units (RFI)] was determined. RESULTS: CD62P, PAC-1 binding and CD11b expression remained unchanged. In contrast, the mean+/-SD MFI of CD40L (from 18.2+/-9.0 to 25.5+/-10.4, P = 0.038) and CD41 (from 446.1+/-213.8 to 605.0+/-183.8, P = 0.010) as markers for increased platelet-leucocyte interaction increased significantly. The collagen-induced ETP time-to-peak was altered significantly from 23.8+/-11.4 to 17.0+/-4.2 min (P = 0.028), although the ETP RFI peak showed no evidence for increased procoagulatory capacity (47.1+/-18.6 to 57.3+/-19.9, P = 0.085). CONCLUSIONS: Effects of the evaluated PI HIV therapy on platelet function assessed under field conditions seem to be minor, not affecting all investigated parameters. We found no evidence for increased platelet activation under PI-containing ART. However, CD41 as a marker for increased platelet-leucocyte interaction and CD40L, which can contribute to atherosclerosis, increased significantly.

Greater viral rebound and reduced time to resume antiretroviral therapy after therapeutic immunization with the ALVAC-HIV vaccine (vCP1452).

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate immunogenicity and clinical efficacy of two immunization strategies with the ALVAC-HIV-recombinant canarypox vaccine (vCP1452) in treated HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study of vCP1452 immunization in chronically HIV-infected patients on therapy with CD4 T-cell count more than 350 cells/microl, CD4 nadir less than 400 cells/microl and pHIV-RNA less than 400 copies/ml. Patients were equally randomized to four injections at weeks 0, 4, 8, 20; three injections at weeks 4, 8, 20; and placebo. The primary endpoint was vaccine immunogenicity at week 24 measured by enzyme-linked immunospot-interferon-gamma against the HIV-gag-reverse transcriptase-nef vaccine sequences. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment resumption and viral quantitation following treatment interruption at week 24. Criteria to resume therapy included CD4 T-cell count decline less than 250 cells/microl or 50% decrease from baseline or pHIV-RNA more than 50,000 copies/ml. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients enrolled. Changes from baseline in HIV-specific T cells in the four injection arms (+480 spot-forming cells/M-peripheral blood mononuclear cell) were significant compared to placebo (+8; P = 0.014), but not in the three injection arms (+322). The week 36 pHIV-RNA (log10 copies/ml) after treatment interruption was higher in the four (4.71; P = 0.023) and three (4.82; P = 0.009) injection arms compared to placebo (4.40). Percentages of patients reaching treatment resumption criteria by week 48 were 74, 55 and 23% in the three respective arms (P = 0.013). Two independent factors influenced time to therapy resumption: immunization (hazards ratio = 2.7, P = 0.048 for three injections; hazards ratio = 4.1, P = 0.003 for four injections) and CD4 nadir (hazards ratio = 0.4, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Significant immunogenicity was induced by vCP1452; however, this strategy was independently associated with a shorter time to resume therapy and higher viral rebound.

The steady-state pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected adult outpatients is not affected by gender-related co-factors.

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacokinetic differences, contributing to drug-related side effects, between men and women have been reported for HIV protease inhibitors. As only limited and inconclusive data on ritonavir-boosted atazanavir are available, we evaluated the respective steady-state pharmacokinetics in 48 male and 26 female HIV-1-infected adults receiving atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once-daily as part of their antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic profiles (24 h) of atazanavir/ritonavir were assessed and measured by HPLC/tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean (GM; ANOVA) of minimum and maximum plasma drug concentrations (C(min) and C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and total clearance (CL(total)) were compared between the sexes and correlated to demographic (age, gender and ethnicity), physiological (weight and body mass index) and clinical (CD4+ cell count, HIV-RNA, co-medication and hepatitis serology) co-factors. RESULTS: The GM of the atazanavir AUC, C(max) and C(min) of men versus women were 32 643 versus 36 232 ng.h/mL [GM ratio (GMR) = 1.11, P = 0.435], 2802 versus 3211 ng/mL (GMR = 1.15, P = 0.305) and 398 versus 470 ng/mL (GMR = 1.18, P = 0.406), respectively. Although weight (80.6 versus 63.9 kg, P = 0.001) and body weight-adjusted atazanavir dose (3.84 versus 4.60 mg/kg, P = 0.013) were different between the sexes, no significant correlation to atazanavir pharmacokinetics was observed. A linear regression analysis detected significant correlations of atazanavir C(min) with ritonavir AUC (P < 0.001) and the co-administration of methadone oral solution (P = 0.032), and inverse correlations with the time since the first HIV infection diagnosis (P = 0.003) and the number of previous antiretroviral treatments (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir/ritonavir steady-state pharmacokinetics was comparable in men and women, despite gender-related significant differences in atazanavir dose/body weight. The administration of atazanavir/ritonavir is pharmacokinetically safe; 95% of all trough samples were above the recommended plasma concentration of 150 ng/mL.

Decrease of atazanavir and lopinavir plasma concentrations in a boosted double human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor salvage regimen.

The human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitor combination of atazanavir (ATV)-lopinavir-ritonavir was reported to exhibit a mutual pharmacoenhancement of plasma lopinavir and ATV concentrations which may be beneficial for salvage patients. We identified 17 patients in our pharmacokinetic database taking this combination and found conflicting results. Plasma concentrations of both ATV and lopinavir were modestly, although not significantly, decreased when the drugs were coadministered. Therefore, patients should be selected carefully for this regimen and frequent clinical and therapeutic drug monitoring is strongly advised.

[No obvious difference in Streptococcus pneumoniae antibiotic resistance profiles--isolates from HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients]. / Vergleichbare Antibiotikaresistenz von Pneumokokkenisolaten HIV-positiver und -negativer Patienten.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: HIV patients are overexposed to hospital environment, immune suppression, and antibiotic prophylaxes. Therefore, with HIV positive patients an increased risk for resistant bacterial rods is to be expected. The purpose of this case-control study was to determine the susceptibility patterns of pneumococci from adult patients in relation to their HIV status and to compare both patient groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2005, samples from internal medicine patients of one university hospital laboratory were investigated on culture of Streptococcus pneumoniae and in case of a positive vial, a resistance test was done by agar diffusion method. All patients with culture-confirmed infection due to pneumococci underwent a standardized retrospective evaluation in regard to demographic and clinical characteristics including HIV status. RESULTS: A total amount of 135 Streptococcus pneumoniae cultures could be assigned to 64 HIV-positive (A) and 71 HIV-negative patients (B), with susceptibility results for 134 isolates. Full susceptibility was seen in 44 (69.8% [A]) versus 42 (59.2% [B]) samples, reduced susceptibility ("intermediate-susceptible") was found in eight (12.7% [A]) versus 17 (23.9% [B]). Eleven (17.5% [A]) and twelve (16.9% [B]), respectively, out of all pneumococci were tested resistant to at least one antibiotic. Among these, resistance to erythromycin was most relevant (11.1% [A] and 11.3% [B]). None of the tested rods was resistant to penicillin. All differences between groups for susceptibility testing were not found significant. HIV-negative patients were significantly older, needed more often hospitalization and intensive care, and cultures for pneumococci were more frequently positive in primary sterile materials, such as cerebrospinal fluid and blood. The difference concerning death within 28 days following positive sample was just not significant as well as in immune suppression status of patients. HIV patients experienced more frequently an infection relapse and were more frequently smokers. CONCLUSION: No obvious difference in pneumococci resistance patterns was observed between HIV-positive and HIV-negative adult patients. The absence of resistance to penicillin underscores the importance of beta-lactams in case of typical community-acquired pneumonia; therefore, this class of antibiotics should be included in treatment guidelines as first-line drugs also for HIV patients. HIV-negative controls of this study were more aged and suffered from a higher morbidity, however, the fact that they were not significantly less immune suppressed may be special character of a university hospital control patient group. HIV patients presented in an earlier stage of their pneumococcal disease, probably due to a direct access to tertiary hospital medical supply. A higher relapse rate underscores the importance of pneumococcal vaccination for HIV patients.

Comparison of genotypic resistance profiles and virological response between patients starting nevirapine and efavirenz in EuroSIDA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare virological outcome and genotypic resistance profiles in HIV-1-infected patients starting non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimens. METHODS: NNRTI-naive patients were included who started treatment with nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) with genotypic resistance test results available at time of initiation (baseline). Virological failure was defined as two consecutive values > 500 copies/ml after starting the regimen. Cox models were used to investigate time to virological failure (the first of two values). RESULTS: A total of 759 patients were included (13% antiretroviral-naive): 389 initiated NVP and 370 initiated EFV. Baseline IAS-USA NNRTI resistance mutations were detected in 3%. Using the Rega algorithm (version 7.1) to interpret resistance, 460 (64%) patients had resistance (full or intermediate) to at least one drug they were starting (69% NVP, 60% EFV, P = 0.011); 287 (74%) NVP and 168 (45%) EFV patients experienced virological failure after treatment initiation, P < 0.001. After adjustment for previous antiretroviral use, previous AIDS, year started NNRTI, CD4 cell count (baseline, nadir), viral load (baseline, maximum), and baseline drug resistance (measured by Rega), the relative hazards (EFV versus NVP) of virological failure was 0.50, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.65, P < 0.001. At time of virological failure, comparable levels of NNRTI resistance were detected. The K103N mutation emerged more in patients failing EFV and Y181C in patients failing NVP. CONCLUSIONS: NVP may be associated with an inferior virological outcome compared to EFV in NNRTI-naive patients with extensive resistance to other drug classes. The profile of NNRTI resistance mutations when virologically failing an NNRTI-containing regimen appears to depend on the NNRTI the patients fail.

The role of antiretroviral therapy in the incidence of pancreatitis in HIV-positive individuals in the EuroSIDA study.

AIM: This study investigated the incidence of pancreatitis and its association with antiretroviral therapy (ART), focussing on stavudine and didanosine. METHODS: EuroSIDA has collected information on pancreatitis since Summer 2001. All identified cases have been verified by the coordinating centre. Individuals were followed from June 2001 or the date of entry into EuroSIDA (whichever occurred later) until a diagnosis of pancreatitis or the last study visit. Factors associated with pancreatitis were investigated using Poisson regression. Cumulative lengths of exposure to didanosine without stavudine, stavudine without didanosine, stavudine with didanosine, and other ART were time-updated variables. Treatment variables were fitted with a 6-month time lag. RESULTS: There were 43 (nine presumptive) pancreatic events in 9678 individuals during 33 742 person-years (incidence 1.27/1000 person-years). The incidence among those with no, 2 or less and over 2 years' exposure to ART including stavudine and didanosine was 1.24, 1.73 and 0.78/1000 person-years, respectively. In multivariable analysis, higher baseline CD4 cell counts were associated with a decreased risk of pancreatitis. There was no evidence of an association of pancreatitis with cumulative exposure to didanosine and stavudine, didanosine without stavudine, stavudine without didanosine, or other ART. CONCLUSION: We observed a low overall rate of pancreatitis in the years 2001-2006, and did not find an association of an increased incidence of pancreatitis with cumulative exposure to antiretroviral agents generally, and to didanosine and stavudine in particular.

Efficacy and tolerability of long-term efavirenz plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors for HIV-1 infection.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term efficacy and tolerability of two efavirenz-containing regimens with those of an indinavir-containing regimen in the initial use of HAART. METHOD: HIV-1-infected patients (N = 1266) were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: efavirenz, zidovudine plus lamivudine, n = 422; efavirenz plus indinavir, n = 429; or indinavir, zidovudine plus lamivudine, n = 415. Entrance criteria included baseline viral load greater than 10 000 copies/ml HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cell count 50 cells/mul or greater, and no previous use of lamivudine, any non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor or protease inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients (response rate) in each regimen with a viral load under 400 copies/ml at 168 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Response rates at 168 weeks were 30% in the indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine group, 48% in the efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine group (P < 0.0001, difference estimate; 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 18.5; 10.9, 26), and 40% in the efavirenz plus indinavir group (P = 0.0018, difference estimate; 97.5% CI 10.2; 2.9, 17.6). Median CD4 cell counts increased above respective baselines by 292 cells/mul (efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine and indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine) and 300 cells/mul (efavirenz plus indinavir). Total discontinuations were 54% (efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine), 63% (efavirenz plus indinavir), and 69% (indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine) of which 13, 12 and 26%, respectively, were caused by adverse events. No new or unexpected increases in the rates or severity of adverse events occurred from long-term treatment with efavirenz-containing regimens. CONCLUSION: Long-term HIV therapy with efavirenz-containing regimens, particularly efavirenz, zidovudine, lamivudine, provides significantly greater antiviral activity and tolerability than a regimen of indinavir, zidovudine plus lamivudine.