Epigenetic regulation on gene expression induced by physical exercise.

It is well established that physical exercise modulates the function of many physiological systems, such as the musculoskeletal, the cardiovascular and the nervous system, by inducing various adaptations to the increased mechanical load and/or metabolic stress of exercise. Many of these changes occur through epigenetic alterations to DNA, such as histone modifications, DNA methylations, expression of microRNAs and changes of the chromatin structure. All these epigenetic alterations may have clinical relevance, thus playing an important role in the prevention and confrontation of neurophysiological disorders, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular diseases and cancer. Herein we review the known epigenetic modifications induced by physical exercise in various physiological systems and pathologies, and discuss their potential clinical implications.

Combination of three cytotoxic agents in small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The established treatment for small-cell lung cancer has been a cisplatin-etoposide combination, as the most effective chemotherapy regimen. Paclitaxel has also been used in combination with cisplatin and etoposide but this has been unacceptable due to the toxicity. This toxicity could be attributed to the three consequent days of treatment with etoposide plus the doses of each of the three drugs. Our objectives were to determine an equal or longer survival and lower toxicity by administering all 3 drugs with low dosage on day one, compared to the established guideline of 3-day administration. METHODS: We tested the aforementioned three-drug combination and avoided the toxicity in the majority of patients by administering all 3 drugs on day one. Fifty-one patients (50 evaluable) were recruited from 4 oncology clinics. All patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed small-cell lung cancer with limited and extensive disease in 40 and 60 % of the patients, respectively. The treatment was: cisplatin 75 mg/m(2), etoposide 120 mg/m(2) (maximum 200 mg), and paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2). The agents were administered on day one and repeated every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. RESULTS: The median survival was 15 months (95 % CI 13.6-16.4) (mean 16 months). Forty-five (90 %) patients achieved a response: 20 (40 %) patients, a complete response and 25 (50 %), a partial response. Adverse reactions included grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in 12 and 2 % of the patients, respectively. Other side effects were of very low toxicity. CONCLUSION: The 1-day, three-agent (cisplatin-etoposide-paclitaxel) treatment of small-cell lung cancer is beneficial with respect to response rate and survival, and the toxicity is low and well-tolerated.

Two consecutive days of treatment with liposomal cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer.

Liposomal cisplatin (Lipoplatin) is a new agent, a cisplatin formulation that has been investigated in a number of studies and compared with cisplatin with respect to toxicity and effectiveness. It has been administered once weekly and in combination with a second agent, once every two weeks. The main outcome of the studies was that lipoplatin has no renal toxicity and is as equally effective as cisplatin. The present study investigated toxicity and effectiveness when lipoplatin is administered on two consecutive days, repeated every two weeks. Between January 2011 and November 2011, a total of 21 patients with histologically- or cytologically-confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in the study. All but two patients, who had not been pretreated, had received one or two series of chemotherapy and some had undergone radiotherapy. Lipoplatin monotherapy was infused for 8 h the first and second days and repeated every 2 weeks with the aim of administering 6 cycles. The dose per day was 200 mg/m(2). Eight out of 21 (38.10%) patients had a partial response, 9 (42.86%) had stable disease and 4 (19.05%) had progressive disease. Results showed that there was no renal failure toxicity and no other adverse reactions apart from grade 1 myelotoxicity in only 2 patients who had been heavily pretreated, and grade 1 nausea/vomiting in 4 patients. Liposomal cisplatin is an agent with negligible toxicity and reasonably high effectiveness even when administered to pretreated patients with NSCLC.

Maintenance chemotherapy or not in ovarian cancer stages IIIA, B, C, and IV after disease recurrence.

PURPOSE: Ovarian cancer may have a high percentage of residual disease after chemotherapy. It is questionable whether second or more lines of chemotherapy are needed in patients with slow-growing residual disease. In the present trial we compared the median survival of patients with residual or recurrent disease who received 1-2 lines of chemotherapy with those who received 3-9 lines. METHODS: Two hundred and five patients with advanced stage IIIA, B, C and IV ovarian cancer were divided into two groups based on the number of chemotherapy lines they received. All patients had prior first-line chemotherapy; the criteria for recruitment in the study were: a) residual or recurrent disease and b) failure to respond to first-line therapy. Group A included patients who received 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy and group B, 3-9 lines. RESULTS: The median survival of group A was 76 months and of group B 53 months (p<0.001). Complete response (CR) was observed in 80 out of the 193 7lpar;41.45%) evaluable patients, partial response (PR) in 37 (19.17%), stable disease (SD) in 54 (27.987percnt;) and progressive disease (PD) in 22 (11.40%) patients. CONCLUSION: In ovarian cancer patients with advanced disease, multiple chemotherapy lines (3=9) offer no advantage over 1 or 2 lines, with respect to overall survival.

Metastatic lung disease treated with pemetrexed-docetaxel combination chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: According to the ASCO guidelines 4 cytotoxic agents are used in colorectal cancer. Numerous agents have not been used or tested and thus their effectiveness is not known. Herein we present the preliminary data of a trial whose objective was to investigate the effectiveness to 2 combined agents in patients with heavily pretreated adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Ten patients have been recruited up until now. Colorectal adenocarcinoma was the primary disease in 7 patients, gastric cancer in 2, and endometrial adenocarcinoma in one. All patients had undergone at least 2 lines of previous chemotherapy during 2-3 years before the trial. The lungs were the only or main site of metastases in all patients. Chemotherapy agents used were pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), repeated every 3 weeks, with a plan to administer 6 cycles. RESULTS: The mean number of cycles were 3 (range 1-6). Total number of cycles 33. No serious toxicity was detected. One patient had complete response, 3 partial response, 5 stable disease, 1 disease progression. Median survival was 6 months (range 2-12+ months). CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of the pemetrexed-docetaxel combination in heavily pretreated adenocarcinoma patients justifies their use when no other alternative exists.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor expression as a prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer.

Hematologic paraneoplastic alternations may not be very common, but they have been observed in a small number of patients. Granulocytosis has been described in several malignancies and its common mechanism may be associated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) production by the tumor. High neutrophilia (150,000-240,000 white blood cell count) observed in two patients with non-small cell lung cancer led us to run the present trial. The purpose of this study was to compare the white blood cell counts and the G-CSF plasma levels of the patients and classify the results into groups, as well as to determine the survival rates of the patients in each of the groups. The histological specimens and plasma of two patients as well as the plasma of another 87 patients with several malignancies, were examined. The plasma G-CSF levels were determined using a quantitative sandwich immunoassay technique (Quantikine; RySD systems) according to the manufacturer's instructions and all samples were tested in triplicate. It was found that 12 patients had a white blood cell count increased beyond normal as well as a high G-CSF plasma level and the survival of these patients was shorter as compared to the rest of the patients. We assume that these findings may indicate that increased G-CSF levels may function as a biomarker of survival.

Comparison of liposomal cisplatin versus cisplatin in non-squamous cell non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Liposomal cisplatin was developed to reduce the systemic toxicity of cisplatin, particularly the nephrotoxicity, and it has been used in combination with other agents in pancreatic and head and neck cancers and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of lipoplatin combined with paclitaxel versus cisplatin with paclitaxel in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. METHODS: During 2007-2010, 202 patients with non-squamous NSCLC (stage IIIB and IV) were recruited from the two participating institutions and divided into two arms: Arm A was treated with liposomal cisplatin 200 mg/m(2) combined with paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) and Arm B with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) in combination with paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2), repeated every 2 weeks. The number of cycles administered was 632 (Arm A) and 640 (Arm B), totaling 1,272. RESULTS: A partial response was achieved by 59.22% of Arm A patients versus 42.42% of Arm B, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.036). The median survival time in months was 10 for Arm A and 8 for Arm B (P 0.1551). After 18 months, the number of surviving patients was double for Arm A versus Arm B. CONCLUSION: Liposomal cisplatin in combination with paclitaxel produces a statistically significantly higher response rate than cisplatin combined with paclitaxel in non-squamous NSCLC.

Treatment of colorectal cancer with and without bevacizumab: a phase III study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this phase III trial was to compare chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: From September 2004 till September 2008, 222 treatment-naive patients were enrolled and divided into 2 arms: 114 arm A patients were treated with leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil plus irinotecan in combination with bevacizumab, and 108 arm B patients were treated as above without bevacizumab. All patients were stage IV with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: The median overall survival of arm A patients was 22.0 months (95% CI: 18.1-25.9) and 25.0 months (CI: 18.1-31.9) for arm B patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 arms (p = 0.1391). No statistically significant difference between the 2 arms regarding the response rate was observed: partial response, 42 patients (36.8%) and 38 patients (35.2%) for arms A and B, respectively. Hematologic toxicity did not differ in the comparison of the 2 arms. Nonhematologic toxicity in arm A involved hypertension in 23 (20.2%) of the patients and proteinuria in 7 (6.1%); 3 patients experienced hemorrhage and 1 patient intestinal perforation. None of these side effects was observed in arm B patients. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference in median overall survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with bevacizumab plus a combination therapy (arm A) and those treated with the combination only, without bevacizumab (arm B), was observed.

Liposomal cisplatin dose escalation for determining the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of liposomal cisplatin (lipoplatin) using nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity and myelotoxicity as the main adverse reactions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lipoplatin, a liposomal formulation of cisplatin was first tested as monotherapy starting at a dose of 125 mg/m(2) and escalating up to 350 mg/m(2). Lipoplatin was then escalated in combination with paclitacel starting at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) escalating up to 250 mg/m(2) for the former and 100 mg/m(2) escalating up to 175 mg/m(2) for the latter. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The present trial determined the DLT for lipoplatin monotherapy at 350 mg/m(2) and the MTD at 300 mg/m(2); for lipoplatin-paclitaxel combination therapy, the DLT was 250 mg/m(2) for lipoplatin and 175 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel whereas the MTD was 200 mg/m(2) for lipoplatin and 175 mg/m(2) for paclitaxel.

Liposomal cisplatin combined with paclitaxel versus cisplatin and paclitaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Liposomal cisplatin is a new formulation developed to reduce the systemic toxicity of cisplatin while simultaneously improving the targeting of the drug to the primary tumor and to metastases by increasing circulation time in the body fluids and tissues. The primary objectives were to determine nephrotoxicity, gastrointestinal side-effects, peripheral neuropathy and hematological toxicity and secondary objectives were to determine the response rate, time to tumor progression (TTP) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-six chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly allocated to receive either 200 mg/m² of liposomal cisplatin and 135 mg/m² paclitaxel (arm A) or 75 mg/m² cisplatin and 135 mg/m² paclitaxel (arm B), once every 2 weeks on an outpatient basis. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were assessable for toxicity, response rate and survival. Nine treatment cycles were planned. RESULTS: Arm A patients showed statistically significant lower nephrotoxicity, grade 3 and 4 leucopenia, grade 2 and 3 neuropathy, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. There was no significant difference in median and overall survival and TTP between the two arms; median survival was 9 and 10 months in arms A and B, respectively, and TTP was 6.5 and 6 months in arms A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal cisplatin in combination with paclitaxel has been shown to be much less toxic than the original cisplatin combined with paclitaxel. Nephrotoxicity in particular was negligible after liposomal cisplatin administration. TTP and survival were similar in both treatment arms.

Plasma VEGF levels in breast cancer patients with and without metastases.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key mediator of angiogenesis since it stimulates the formation of new blood vessels. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is related to the promotion of endothelial cells into tube-like structures, and it is therefore expected to promote angiogenesis with a greater potency than VEGF. VEGF and bFGF are considered to be biomarkers that predict treatment effectiveness. Elevated plasma VEGF and bFGF levels have been reported in a variety of different malignant tumors, and patients with metastatic disease have also been reported to present with higher serum VEGF and bFGF levels. Other studies have documented controversial results with respect to the prognostic and predictive value of the aforementioned biomarkers. This study aimed to determine the plasma VEGF and bFGF levels in breast cancer patients without metastatic disease compared with breast cancer patients with advanced metastatic disease. The study included 93 patients with breast cancer, 46 without recurrent disease (group A) and 47 with metastatic disease (group B), as well as 21 healthy individuals. The median age was 58 years (range 34-78) for group A and 59 years (range 37-75) for group B. All 93 patients underwent chemotherapy, adjuvant for group A, and adjuvant plus chemotherapy for group B patients with advanced disease. Plasma VEGF and bFGF levels were determined using a quantitative sandwich immunoassay, and samples were tested in triplicate (ELISA). The plasma levels of VEGF and bFGF varied greatly, i.e., from extremely low to extremely high in the two groups, as well as in the healthy individuals. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups or between the patients and healthy individuals. Data of the present study therefore showed that VEGF and bFGF levels are not valuable biomarkers for predicting treatment outcome.

Capecitabine (Xeloda) as monotherapy in advanced breast and colorectal cancer: effectiveness and side-effects.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a fluoropyrimidine which is transformed to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at the tumor site. The aim of the present study was to estimate the efficacy of this agent in pretreated patients with advanced breast and colorectal cancer, and to determine the response rate and adverse reactions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients (median age 65 years, range 27-80 years), 24 with breast cancer, 17 with colorectal cancer and one with a pancreatic islet tumor were included. Capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1200 mg/m2 twice daily for two weeks every 21 days. No other agent or supportive treatment was planned. RESULTS: A partial response was observed in 29.16% of the patients with breast cancer and in 11.76% of the patients with colorectal cancer. Stable disease was observed in 58.33% and 70.59% of the breast cancer and colorectal patients, respectively. Adverse reactions were very mild with respect to myelotoxicity and GI tract toxicity. Grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was observed in three patients (7.14%). Hypertriglyceridemia, an unusual side-effect, was observed in 5/12 patients who were tested for serum cholesterol triglycerides. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine is a well tolerated treatment with low toxicity, rendering a partial response in 29.16% and 11.76% of patients with breast and colorectal cancer, respectively.

Weekly administration of topotecan-paclitaxel as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the weekly administration of topotecan combined with paclitaxel in pretreated advanced ovarian cancer patients; our objectives were to determine efficacy, toxicity and survival. METHODS: The chemotherapy agents, topotecan and paclitaxel were administered on a weekly basis for 3 consecutive weeks, every 28 days. The plan was to give three courses (each course included three once-weekly infusions). The dose of topotecan was 1.75 mg/m(2) and of paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2). RESULTS: From January 2004 until January 2006, 45 patients were enrolled in this multicenter trial; 44 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median age was 60 years old (range 39-82 years) and performance status was 0-2. Thirty-nine patients were in stage III and 5 in stage IV. All patients had been pretreated with carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with paclitaxel. Complete and partial responses were seen in 39% of the patients, stable disease in 43% and progressive disease in 18%; median survival time was 9 months, range 2-24+ months, (95% CI: 7.9-10.2). There was a notable absence of grade 3 toxicity except for neutropenia in 11% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The combination of topotecan and paclitaxel administered on a weekly basis is a well-tolerated chemotherapy schedule. The response rate of 39% is quite high for patients with pretreated ovarian cancer.

Surgical management in lung metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a non-aggressive slow-growing disease. Surgery is often considered for the management of metastases. Chemotherapeutical agents may offer tumor reduction but radical tumor remission can only be achieved by surgery. The aim of the present study was to show the evolution of patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer, treated with surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred and seventy-nine (male 327, female 252, median age 60 years [range 30-87 years], disease stage IV) patients with colorectal cancer were evaluated. Histology showed adenocarcinoma with 94% moderate differentiation. Sixty-six patients (11.40%) had only lung metastasis (single or multiple deposits). Of these 66 patients, 57 were treated with surgery (pneumonectomy, lobectomy or nodule excision) and in 52/57 (91.23%) the tumor was removed. RESULTS: In 29 patients (50.88%) the disease recurred 8 months after surgery, at the earliest; however, no recurrence was observed in 28 patients (49.12%) during 2-8 years of follow-up after the operation. Five-year survival was 32.69%. CONCLUSION: Metastectomy of lung metastasis from primary colorectal cancer may achieve long-term survival without recurrence in a large percentage of patients.

Front-line paclitaxel and topotecan chemotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Based on previous experience, we combined topotecan with paclitaxel (weekly administration) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our primary objective was to determine the response rate and survival and our secondary objective, the safety of the regimen. METHODS: From October 2003, until March 2005, 45 patients all with histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled. All patients were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive. Both agents were infused on day 1 of every week once for three consecutive weeks, every 28 days. Three infusions were considered as one course. The treatment plan was to give three courses (nine infusions) and then to evaluate the response. Topotecan (1.75 mg/m2) was infused for 30 min and paclitaxel (70 mg/m2) for 90 min; these doses had been established as the maximum tolerated dose in a previous phase I-II trial. RESULTS: Eighteen/45 (40%) patients responded, 2 (4.4%) complete responses and 16 (35.6%) partial responses. Twenty-one (46.7%) patients had stable disease, and 6 (13.3%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 8 months and median time to tumor progression 9 months. Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in two patients (in these two patients, the dose of both drugs was reduced by 25% and G-CSF was given), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in one patient and grade 4 anemia in one patient. CONCLUSION: This novel combination of topotecan-paclitaxel in a weekly administration rendered a 40% response rate, with very low toxicity in stages IIIA, IIIB and IV NSCLC patients.

Second-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer in a modified administration of topotecan combined with paclitaxel: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: Our main objective was to investigate the response rate in pretreated patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received a weekly administration of topotecan and paclitaxel; our secondary objectives were to assess toxicity and survival. METHODS: Topotecan 1.75 mg/m2 was combined with paclitaxel 70 mg/m2; these cytotoxic agents were administered once every week (day 1) for 3 consecutive weeks (one cycle), and repeated every 28 days (three infusions per cycle) for a minimum of three cycles. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled, 41 of whom were evaluable for response and toxicity. The median number of cycles was two (range 1-6). Eleven/forty-one (26.83%) patients responded: one complete response and ten partial responses; the median duration of response was 4 months (range 2-8 months); the median overall survival was 7 months (95% CI: 4.2-9.8). Myelotoxicity was the most common adverse reaction (grade 3 neutropenia in 19.5% of the patients and grade 4 in 7.32%). Non-hematologic toxicities varied from 2.44% to 9.76%. No patient had to stop treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Topotecan combined with paclitaxel, given on day 1 on a weekly basis, produced a response rate of 26.83% in pretreated patients with SCLC. Myelotoxicity, particularly neutropenia, was the main adverse reaction, but in a minority of patients.

Angiosarcoma of the heart: case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Primary angiosarcoma of the heart is an extremely rare malignant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 32-year-old female with primary angiosarcoma of the heart at an advanced stage with lung and bone metastases is presented. The tumor showed extensive expression of c-erb-B2 and a moderate expression of c-kit. Chemotherapy (cisplatin, epirubicin and ifosfamide) was administered. Herceptin as well as glivec were added to the above combination. RESULTS: There was a good partial response and the lung deposits almost disappeared. The duration of response was 6 months. CONCLUSION: This case of angiosarcoma of the heart is presented because of the extreme rarity of this disease, and its responsiveness to chemotherapy in combination with imatinib and herceptin.

Primitive neurectodermal tumors: a case of extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma of the small intestine and review of the literature.

This is a review of extraosseous Ewing's sarcoma (ES) which includes a new, extremely rare case. The literature was examined with respect to determining the locations of extraosseous ESs, the incidence per site and in total and the criteria which confirm the similarity between extraosseous and osseous ES. ES sites were detected in several organs and tissues, mainly in the trunk, extremities and the retroperitoneal region. Studies confirmed that osseous and extraosseous ES are identical chromosomally and histologically. ES of the small intestine, described here, has not been previously documented in the literature. Along with the other different documented sites, a new location of primary extraosseous ES is also reported here.

Front-line paclitaxel and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase I-II trial.

Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of irinotecan plus paclitaxel administered on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks, in untreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In total, 56 patients with inoperable or metastatic stage III and IV NSCLC with a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis were enrolled. None of the patients had undergone prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Treatment involved irinotecan 125 mg m(-2) and paclitaxel 135 mg m(-2) administered on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks for a planned number of nine cycles. With a standard dose of paclitaxel at 135 mg m(-2), the dosage of irinotecan was escalated at four levels: 75, 100, 125 and 150 mg m(-2); 125 mg m(-2) was established as the maximum tolerated dose; this dosage was administered to 46 patients. A total of 52 patients (median age 65 years, range 38-77 years) were assessable for toxicity and survival and 46 for response rate. Out of 46 evaluable patients, 19 achieved partial response (41.3%), 17 had stable disease (37%) and 10 (21.7%) experienced disease progression. The median duration of response was 6 months (range 2-9+ months). The main adverse reactions were myelotoxicity (grades 3 and 4) in 10 (19.2%) patients and diarrhoea (grade 3) in four (7.7%) patients. Irinotecan combined with paclitaxel, administered every 2 weeks, appears to be an effective treatment for advanced-stage NSCLC.

Irinotecan combined with docetaxel in pre-treated metastatic breast cancer patients: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: This is a phase II study where a novel chemotherapy combination was tested in pre-treated breast cancer patients: docetaxel and irinotecan have already been established as agents for breast and colorectal cancer, respectively. METHODS: Forty-eight (median age 54 years, range 26-77 year) patients, all evaluable, were enrolled. All patients had been pre-treated with anthracycline-combined chemotherapy, 30 of whom were also treated with paclitaxel and 2 with docetaxel. World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 0-2. The dominant metastasis was in the liver (54.17%), in the lungs (27.08%), in soft tissues (12.50%) and in the skeleton (6.25%). Treatment involved irinotecan infusion 200 mg/m(2) for 90 min and docetaxel infusion 80 mg/m(2) for 90 min, repeated once every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-five (52.08%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 37.95-66.21) patients showed responses: 3 complete (6.25%, 95% CI 0-13.05) and 22 (45.83%, 95% CI 31.74-59.92) partial; the most responsive metastases were observed at the liver site (53.85%). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed in 18 patients (37.50%); 14 (29.17%) patients developed anaemia and three (6.25%), thrombocytopenia. Concerning non-haematologic toxicity, alopecia and fatigue were common; grade 3 diarrhea was observed in only one (2.08%) patient. CONCLUSION: The irinotecan-docetaxel combination produces quite a high response rate in pre-treated advanced breast cancer patients.