Bundled Payments and Hidden Costs.

In a fee-for-service environment, anesthesiologists are paid for the volume of services billed, with little relation to the cost of delivering the services. In bundled payments, anesthesiologists are paid a set fee for an episode of care inclusive of all the anesthesia, pain medicine, and related services for the surgical episode and a period of time after the initial procedure to cover complications and redo procedures. When calculating a bundled payment, all the services typically used by a patient must be counted when calculating both the costs and expected payment.

The changing anesthesia economic landscape: emergence of large multispecialty practices and Accountable Care Organizations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we evaluate the current US employment models for healthcare in general and anesthesiologists in particular and the emergence of large, multispecialty physician groups and the forces behind this change to the current anesthesia practice model. We will also examine the present payment method for anesthesiologists and determine how Accountable Care Organizations will affect the future payment models. RECENT FINDINGS: Very few anesthesiologists are aware of the changing economic landscape in the specialty, and this review will provide an up-to-date examination of the changes that anesthesiologists may face in the ensuing years. Accountable Care Organizations will have a drastic impact on the ways in which anesthesiologists are reimbursed and will require anesthesiologists to become more involved in perioperative patient care and outcomes. SUMMARY: This is the most critical time in the specialty of anesthesiology from an economic viewpoint, and significant threats and opportunities will arise for anesthesiologists in how they are reimbursed, and how they demonstrate the delivery of quality care to patients.

Moderate sedation for chest physicians.

Specialists in pulmonary and critical care medicine frequently perform invasive procedures that may require sedation or anesthesia for patient comfort. The number and complexities of interventional pulmonary procedures that can be performed in the bronchoscopy suite or critical care unit continues to expand. Procedures that formerly were done only in the operating room on inpatients are now done routinely in the office, ambulatory surgery center, or hospital outpatient department. No matter the setting, the key to successfully performing these procedures is a safe, pain-free environment for the patient. Anesthesia care and procedural sedation services share the goals of providing the patient comfort during a painful procedure and the operating physician an acceptable working environment. Historically, anesthesiologists have applied the expertise gained in managing anesthesia for major surgeries to sedation care for minor procedures. While the supply of anesthesiologists and anesthetists has shown only a modest increase, the growth in minimally invasive procedures has been explosive in recent years. To meet demand, a service, originally known as conscious sedation and now referred to as moderate sedation, has become common, in which the operating physician supervises a specially trained sedation nurse. This article will provide a clinical definition of moderate sedation and then focus on ways to properly code and bill for pulmonary procedures performed with moderate sedation.

Effects of droperidol dosage on postoperative emetic symptoms following pediatric strabismus surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of postoperative emetic symptoms and side effects in pediatric strabismus surgery using four doses of droperidol. DESIGN: Randomized, blinded study. SETTING: University eye institute. PATIENTS: 82 ASA physical status I and II pediatric patients, aged 1 to 16 years, undergoing outpatient strabismus surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to one of four doses of droperidol (10, 20, 40, or 80 microg.kg(-1)) (Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). All patients received the same anesthetic management, with droperidol administered intravenously immediately after induction of anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postoperatively, patients were evaluated for emetic symptoms (nausea, retching, and/or vomiting) and side effects (postoperative sedation or extrapyramidal symptoms). There was a dose-dependent reduction of emetic symptoms seen with increasing droperidol dose. Predischarge emetic symptoms were 50%, 15%, 15%, and 5% in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (p < 0.009). Peak emetic symptoms were observed after discharge: 75%, 40%, 35%, and 15% in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively (p < 0.003). Convalescence times, including awakening, extubation, recovery, and hospitalization, were unaffected by increasing droperidol dose. Sedation was similar in all groups and no patient exhibited any side effects. However, when patients exhibited emetic symptoms, discharge time increased from 207 +/- 57 minutes to 283 +/- 128 minutes (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic administration of droperidol 80 microg.kg(-1) is most effective in reducing postoperative emetic symptoms without increasing time to discharge. In those patients with emetic symptoms who also received prophylactic droperidol, time to discharge was significantly delayed.