Brain Metastasis Incidence and Patterns of Presentation After Definitive Treatment of Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Potential Argument for Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Surveillance.

Purpose: Brain metastases (BMs) are a common source of morbidity and mortality. Guidelines do not advise brain surveillance for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We describe the incidence, time to development, presentation, and management of BMs after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods and Materials: We reviewed records of patients with LA-NSCLC treated with CRT within the period from 2013 to 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the population and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to BM. Fisher exact tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare outcomes between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Results: A total of 219 patients were reviewed including 96 with squamous cell carcinoma, 88 with adenocarcinoma, and 35 with large cell/not otherwise specified (LC/NOS). Thirty-nine patients (17.8%) developed BMs: 35 (90%) symptomatic and 4 (10%) asymptomatic. The rate of BM was highest in LC/NOS (34.3%) and adenocarcinoma (23.9%). Ninety percent of BMs occurred within 2 years. All asymptomatic patients underwent stereotactic radiosurgery alone, compared with 40% of symptomatic patients (P = .04). Symptomatic patients were more likely to require hospitalization (65.7% vs 0%, P = .02), craniotomy (25.7% vs 0%, not significant), and steroids (91.4% vs 0%, P < .001). Cumulative BM volume was higher for symptomatic patients (4 vs 0.24 cm3, P < .001) as was median greatest axial dimension (2.18 vs 0.52 cm, P < .001). Conclusions: We identified a high rate of BMs, particularly in LC/NOS and adenocarcinoma histology NSCLC. The majority were symptomatic. These results provide rationale for post-CRT magnetic resonance imaging brain surveillance for patients at high risk of BM.

Association of Unilateral Radiotherapy With Contralateral Lymph Node Failure Among Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Ipsilateral neck radiotherapy (RT) is controversial in some patients with tonsil cancer due to concern for nodal failure within the contralateral nonirradiated neck (hereinafter referred to as contralateral neck failure [CNF]). Objective: To determine the rate of CNF following ipsilateral neck RT in patients with tonsil cancer. Data Sources: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were queried for peer-reviewed, English language articles published between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2021. Study Selection: Studies reporting rates of CNF from at least 20 patients treated with ipsilateral neck RT. Studies were excluded if they lacked full text, reported results from databases or systematic reviews, or did not provide RT details. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted following the PRISMA reporting guideline. Study quality was assessed using criteria from a methodological index for nonrandomized studies. Pooled outcomes were estimated using random-effects models. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was the pooled rate of CNF following ipsilateral neck RT. Secondary outcomes were the pooled rates of CNF by tumor and nodal staging categories from the 7th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and rates of toxic effects. Results: A total of 17 studies (16 retrospective and 1 prospective) including 1487 unique patients were identified. The pooled risk of CNF was 1.9% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.6%). The rate of CNF by tumor (T) category was as follows: 1.3% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.3%) for T1; 3.0% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.4%) for T2; 11.3% (95% CI, 3.3%-19.2%) for T3; and 16.0% (95% CI, -7.8% to 39.8%) for T4. Patients with T3 to T4 tumors had a significantly higher rate of CNF than those with T1 to T2 tumors (11.5% [95% CI, 3.9%-19.1%] vs 1.8% [95% CI, 1.0%-2.6%]; P < .001). The rate of CNF by nodal (N) category was 1.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-2.2%) for N0; 4.8% (95% CI, 2.4%-7.2%) for N1; 3.1% (95% CI, 0.4%-5.8%) for N2a; 3.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-4.9%) for N2b; and 0 (95% CI, not applicable) for N3. Rates of CNF were similar for patients with N2b to N3 and N0 to N2a disease (3.0% [95% CI, 1.2%-4.7%] vs 1.7% [95% CI, 0.6%-2.8%], respectively; P = .07). Compared with bilateral RT, ipsilateral RT was associated with increased risk of CNF (log odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.09-2.48]; P = .04). The crude rates of xerostomia of grade 3 or greater and feeding tube use were 0.9% (95% CI, -0.2% to 1.9%) and 13.3% (95% CI, 8.3%-18.3%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, ipsilateral neck RT was associated with a low rate of CNF in patients with small, lateralized tonsil cancers. Bilateral neck RT was associated with lower risk of CNF compared with ipsilateral neck RT. Patients with tumors of a higher T category were at increased risk for CNF following ipsilateral neck RT, and advanced nodal stage was not associated with CNF. Rates of toxic effects appeared favorable in patients treated with ipsilateral neck RT.

Bridging the Communication Gaps: A Prospective Single-Arm Pilot Study Testing the Feasibility of Interdisciplinary Radiotherapy Planning in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The treatment of locally advanced lung cancer (LALC) with radiotherapy (RT) can be challenging. Multidisciplinary collaboration between radiologists and radiation oncologists (ROs) may optimize RT planning, reduce uncertainty in follow-up imaging interpretation, and improve outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective clinical treatment trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04844736), 37 patients receiving definitive RT for LALC, six attending ROs, and three thoracic radiologists were consented and enrolled across four treatment centers. Prior to RT plan finalization, representative computed tomography (CT) slices with overlaid outlines of preliminary irradiation targets were shared with the team of radiologists. The primary endpoint was to assess feasibility of receiving feedback no later than 4 business days of RT simulation on at least 50% of plans. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with lung cancer were enrolled, and 35 of 37 RT plans were reviewed. Of the 35 patients reviewed, mean age was 69 years. For 27 of 37 plans (73%), feedback was received within 4 or fewer days (interquartile range 3-4 days). Thirteen of 35 cases (37%) received feedback that the delineated target potentially did not include all sites suspicious for tumor involvement. In total, changes to the RT plan were recommended for over- or undercoverage in 16 of 35 cases (46%) and implemented in all cases. Radiology review resulted in no treatment delays and substantial changes to irradiated volumes: gross tumor volume, -1.9 to +96.1%; planning target volume, -37.5 to +116.5%. CONCLUSION: Interdisciplinary collaborative RT planning using a simplified workflow was feasible, produced no treatment delays, and prompted substantial changes in RT targets.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with planned Gamma Knife radiosurgery boost for head and neck cancer with extensive disease in proximity to critical structures.

BACKGROUND: To describe intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKRS) boost for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) with disease near dose-limiting structures. METHODS: Patients with HNC treated with IMRT/GKRS as part of a combined modality approach between 2011 and 2021 were reviewed. Local control, overall survival and disease-specific survival were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Nineteen patients had T3-4 tumors. Median follow-up was 26.3 months. GKRS site control was 95%. Two patients progressed at the treated primary site, one patient failed at the edge of the GKRS treatment volume, with no perineural or intracranial failure. 2-year OS was 94.7% (95% CI: 85.2%-100%). Concurrent chemotherapy was given in nine patients (45%). One patient (5%) received induction/concurrent chemotherapy. Brain radionecrosis occurred in three patients, one of which was biopsy-proven. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT plus GKRS boost results in excellent disease control near critical structures with minimal toxicity.

Discordance Between Oncology Clinician-Perceived and Radiologist-Intended Meaning of the Postradiotherapy Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Freeform Report for Head and Neck Cancer.

Importance: Assessment of response after radiotherapy (RT) using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) is routine in managing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Freeform reporting may contribute to a clinician's misunderstanding of the nuclear medicine (NM) physician's image interpretation, with important clinical implications. Objective: To assess clinician-perceived freeform report meaning and discordance with NM interpretation using the modified Deauville score (MDS). Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study that was conducted at an academic referral center and National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center and included patients with HNSCC treated with RT between January 2014 and December 2019 with a posttreatment PET/CT and 1 year or longer of follow-up, 4 masked clinicians independently reviewed freeform PET/CT reports and assigned perceived MDS responses. Interrater reliability was determined. Clinician consensus-perceived MDS was then compared with the criterion standard NM MDS response derived from image review. Data analysis was conducted between December 2021 and February 2022. Exposures: Patients were treated with RT in either the definitive or adjuvant setting, with or without concurrent chemotherapy. They then underwent posttreatment PET/CT response assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinician-perceived (based on the freeform PET/CT report) and NM-defined response categories were assigned according to MDS. Clinical outcomes included locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: A total of 171 patients were included (45 women [26.3%]; median [IQR] age, 61 [54-65] years), with 149 (87%) with stage III to IV disease. Of these patients, 52 (30%) received postoperative RT and 153 (89%) received concurrent chemotherapy. Interrater reliability was moderate (κ = 0.68) among oncology clinicians and minimal (κ = 0.36) between clinician consensus and NM. Exact agreement between clinician consensus and the NM was 64%. The NM-rated MDS was significantly associated with locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this cohort study suggest that considerable variation in perceived meaning exists among oncology clinicians reading freeform HNSCC post-RT PET/CT reports, with only minimal agreement between MDS derived from clinician perception and NM image interpretation. The NM use of a standardized reporting system, such as MDS, may improve clinician-NM communication and increase the value of HNSCC post-RT PET/CT reports.

Timing of radiotherapy and chemotherapy start for patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ideal timing for the initiation of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) in the use of definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for patients with head and neck cancer is not well established. We sought to evaluate the impact of the timing of initiating these two modalities on clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who were treated using definitive chemoradiation from 2012 to 2018 were identified. Patients undergoing re-irradiation, post-op CRT, had recurrent or second primaries, or ECOG 3-4 were excluded. Outcomes including locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and compared between subgroups of the cohort based on the timing in which chemotherapy or RT were initiated: chemotherapy first, same day start, within 24 h, or start on Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were included for analysis consisting of oropharynx (64%), larynx (22.9%), nasopharynx (6.9%), hypopharynx (3.1%), oral cavity (1.5%), and unknown primary (1.5%). Chemotherapy was administered as bolus cisplatin every 3 weeks in 40% of patients and weekly cisplatin in 60% with a median cumulative dose of 240 mg/m2. In the multivariable analysis (MVA), starting chemotherapy before RT was associated with improved LRC (HR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.99). Three-year LRC for patients starting chemotherapy first was 90.9% compared to 78.2% in those starting RT first. In the MVA, cisplatin regimen and cumulative cisplatin dose were associated with improved OS, while no factors were significantly associated with DC or PFS. CONCLUSION: Starting chemotherapy prior to radiation therapy improves LRC, but did not impact DC, PFS, or OS. Clinical outcomes were not different when stratifying by the other differences in the timing of initiating chemotherapy or RT.

Rapid Development of Clinically Symptomatic Radiation Recall Pneumonitis Immediately Following COVID-19 Vaccination.

In this report, we present the case of a 66-year-old man who received local consolidation radiotherapy to the right lung and mediastinum for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following partial response to upfront chemoimmunotherapy. He continued with maintenance immunotherapy and was asymptomatic for eight months after completing radiation therapy. He then developed symptoms consistent with pneumonitis within three to five days of his first administration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine injection. He reported that these symptoms significantly intensified within three to five days of receiving his second dose of the vaccine. The clinical time frame and radiographic evidence raised suspicion for radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP). Patients undergoing maintenance immunotherapy after prior irradiation may be at increased risk of this phenomenon that may be triggered by the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Long-Term Outcomes From a Phase 2 Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With External Beam Radiation Therapy for Patients With Inoperable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Long-term outcomes after external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are not well known. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC were enrolled in a prospective single-arm, phase 2 study between June 2007 and October 2008 and were treated with RFA followed by EBRT. Radiation was delivered using hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT; 70.2 Gy in 26 fractions) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (54 Gy in 3 fractions). RESULTS: Twelve patients were evaluable; 10 patients were treated with HFRT. The cumulative incidence of local progression at 5 years was 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-37.8). Median progression-free survival was 37.8 months (95% CI, 11.1 to not reached) and median overall survival was 53.6 months (95% CI, 21.0 to not reached). There were no mortalities within 30 days after RFA and no grade ≥4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of RFA with EBRT appears feasible with favorable long-term local control. However, because SBRT alone has similar or better rates of control, we do not recommend routine combined RFA and EBRT.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for synchronous early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who present with multiple pulmonary nodules, it is often difficult to distinguish metastatic disease from synchronous primary lung cancers (SPLC). We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) alone to synchronous primary lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with synchronous AJCC 8th Edition Stage IA-IIA NSCLC and treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to all lesions between 2009-2018 were reviewed. SPLC was defined as patients having received two courses of SBRT within 180 days for treatment of separate early stage tumors. In total, 36 patients with 73 lesions were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), and regional/distant failure (R/DF) were estimated and compared with a control cohort of solitary early stage NSCLC patients. RESULTS: Median PFS was 38.8 months (95% CI 14.3-not reached [NR]); 3-year PFS rates were 50.6% (35.6-72.1). Median OS was 45.9 months (95% CI: 35.9-NR); 3-year OS was 63.0% (47.4-83.8). Three-year cumulative incidence of LF and R/DF was 6.6% (3.7-13.9) and 35.7% (19.3-52.1), respectively. Patients with SPLC were compared to a control group (n = 272) of patients treated for a solitary early stage NSCLC. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS (p = .91) or OS (p = .43). Evaluation of the patterns of failure showed a trend for worse cumulative incidence of R/DF in SPLC patients as compared to solitary early stage NSCLC (p = .06). CONCLUSION: SBRT alone to multiple lung tumors with SPLC results in comparable PFS, OS, and LF rates to a cohort of patients treated for solitary early stage NSCLC. Those with SPLC had non-significantly higher R/DF. Patients with SPLC should be followed closely for failure and possible salvage therapy.

Impact of dose to lung outside the planning target volume on distant metastasis or progression after SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Mean dose (EQD2) to 3-cm shell of lung surrounding the PTV was evaluated for association with distant metastasis and PFS after SBRT for stage I NSCLC. Dose was uniformly above previously determined threshold and metastasis was uncommon. An association between outcomes and mean EQD2 could not be confirmed or refuted.

Five- Versus Ten-Fraction Regimens of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary and Metastatic NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: At our institution, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has commonly been prescribed with 50 Gy in 5 fractions and in select cases, 50 Gy in 10 fractions. We sought to evaluate the impact of these 2 fractionation schedules on local control and survival outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed patients treated with SBRT with 50 Gy/5 fraction or 50 Gy/10 fraction for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic NSCLC. Cumulative incidence of local failure (LF) was estimated using competing risk methodology. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method only for patients with stage I disease. RESULTS: Of the 353 lesions, 300 (85%) were treated with 50 Gy in 5 fractions and 53 (15%) with 10 fractions. LFs at 3 years were 6.5% and 23.9% and Kaplan-Meier estimate of median time to LF was 17.5 months and 26.2 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed increasing planning target volume (hazard ratio 1.01, P = .04) as an independent predictor of increased LF, but tumor size, ultracentral location, and 10 fractions were not. Among patients with stage I NSCLC (n = 298), overall median PFS was 35.6 months and median OS was 42.4 months. There was no difference in PFS or OS between the 2 treatment regimens for patients with stage I NSCLC. Low rates of grade 3+ toxicity were observed, with 1 patient experiencing grade 3 pneumonitis after a 5-fraction regimen of SBRT. CONCLUSION: Dose-fractionation schemes with BED10 ≥ 100 Gy provide superior local control and should be offered when meeting commonly accepted constraints. If those regimens appear unsafe, 50 Gy in 10 fractions may provide acceptable compromise between tumor control and safety with relatively durable control, and minimal negative impact on long-term survival.