Primary and specialty palliative care utilization at a regional Burn center.

There is little research informing appropriate specialty palliative care consultation over primary palliative care practice, or the ability of the burn surgeon to perform skills such as effective goals of care discussions. We sought to characterize patterns of palliative care utilization and hypothesized that greater modified Baux (mBaux) and systemic organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores would correlate with increased specialty palliative involvement but have no relationship with primary palliative involvement. A retrospective chart review was conducted at a regional burn center between 2020-2021 including patients admitted with burns or inhalation injury and a mBaux score over 60, detailing circumstances of palliative consultation and goals of care discussions. 163 patients met criteria. Odds of specialty palliative consultation increased by 3.9% for each additional mBaux score point and 23.3% for every SOFA score point. The odds of a goals of care discussion by a burn surgeon increased by 3.5% for each mBaux score point and 23.9% for each SOFA score point. Those receiving palliative consultation tended to have greater burn surface area, graft complications, code status changes, and more goals of care discussions by any provider at admission; there was no difference in symptom control or hospital length of stay. Higher mBaux and SOFA scores correlate with increased odds of both specialty and primary palliative involvement in our cohort. There is bias in diverting both primary and specialty palliative care resources toward acutely ill patients and those with less immediate projected mortality may need additional attention.

Incidence of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries After Training to Protect the Perineum.

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASISs) are a devastating postpartum complication; reducing rates is paramount to improving quality of care. In Norway, implementation of a perineal protection program decreased the incidence of OASIS by 48%. We sought to assess impact on OASIS rates following a similar program. METHODS: This institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study was performed in an academic hospital system. The periods of analysis were November 2014 through October 2015 for the preintervention arm and November 2015 through October 2016 for the postintervention arm. From November 2 to 6, 2015, 2 Norwegian experts conducted a didactic and hands-on, on-site workshop focusing on perineal protection. The experts were then present on labor and delivery wards to reinforce perineal protection in live deliveries. Teachings were emphasized at departmental meetings for the remainder of the year. Data were extracted from electronic medical records and manually audited. RESULTS: The rate of vaginal delivery was similar among both periods (6504 and 6650; P = 0.059). Obstetric anal sphincter injury rates decreased from 211 (3.2%) preintervention to 189 (2.8%) after the workshop. Although this represented 32 fewer injuries, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.179). Obstetric anal sphincter injuries following forceps-assisted deliveries did decline significantly from 103 (28%) to 81 (21%) (P = 0.014). In addition, incidence of fourth-degree lacerations during resident deliveries decreased significantly from 10 (0.6%) to 3 (0.2%) (P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: An educational workshop focusing on perineal support was not associated with a significant reduction in overall OASIS rates. Nevertheless, decreased forceps-related OASIS and fourth-degree lacerations rates support positive influence of the intervention.

Awareness Regarding Perineal Protection, Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury, and Episiotomy Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents; Effects of an Educational Workshop.

OBJECTIVES: Appropriate perineal protection may reduce rates of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). We sought to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of obstetrics and gynecology residents concerning perineal protection, OASIS, and episiotomy before and after an educational workshop. METHODS: This was an institutional review board-approved cross-sectional survey study of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Two experts in perineal protection, whose methods have been shown to reduce OASIS by 50%, provided 1 week of education. Residents were taught in hands-on workshops and labor and delivery wards. Residents were surveyed regarding experiences, knowledge, and opinions of perineal protection, OASIS, and episiotomy. Surveys were administered immediately before and after the workshop and at 3 months following. RESULTS: All 31 residents participated. Almost all (97%) felt it was possible to reduce the incidence of OASIS prior to the workshop. Statistically significant increases were noted following training in the number that felt it was "very effective" to use the 2-handed technique taught in the workshop (P = 0.002), as well as those that reported most commonly performing a mediolateral episiotomy (protective against OASIS, if used selectively) when episiotomy was indicated (P = 0.001). The percent that reported feeling "comfortable" or "very comfortable" performing episiotomies increased from 45% to 77% immediately after the workshop (P = 0.002); this declined to 55% at 3 months. A large majority (77%) reported that the workshop was beneficial; 65% described an impact to patient care. CONCLUSIONS: A workshop targeting perineal protection improved awareness and changed clinical practice in this group of residents. Ongoing education regarding perineal protection and episiotomy may reinforce behavior modifications.

Analysis of Surgical Outcomes and Determinants of Litigation Among Women With Transvaginal Mesh Complications.

OBJECTIVES: To identify litigation predictors among women with complications of transvaginal mesh. METHODS: Chart review and patient survey were conducted among women who had undergone a complication-related explant of a transvaginal prolapse or incontinence sling mesh. Trained study personnel administered a 57-question survey addressing subjective complaints related to bowel, bladder, sexual dysfunction, and development of pain or recurrent prolapse. These data were analyzed with respect to the subject's reported pursuit of litigation related to the mesh complication. Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using the χ test and the t test as indicated. RESULTS: Ninety-five (68%) of 139 women completed the surveys with 60% of the patients pursuing litigation at the time of the survey. Individual risk factors for pursuing litigation included development of vaginal pain after mesh placement (P = 0.01); dyspareunia after mesh placement (P = 0.01); persistence of dyspareunia, suprapubic pain, and groin pain after mesh excision (P = 0.04, P = 0.02, and P = 0.001, respectively); unsuccessful attempts at conservative management of pelvic pain using pelvic floor rehabilitation (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There is an association between a higher likelihood of pursuing litigation and new-onset or persistent pain symptoms attributable to transvaginal mesh.

Teaching resident physicians chronic disease management: simulating a 10-year longitudinal clinical experience with a standardized dementia patient and caregiver.

BACKGROUND: Education for all physicians should include specialty-specific geriatrics-related and chronic disease-related topics. OBJECTIVE: We describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a chronic disease/geriatric medicine curriculum designed to teach Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies and geriatric medicine competencies to residents by using longitudinal encounters with a standardized dementia patient and her caregiver daughter. INTERVENTION: Over 3 half-day sessions, the unfolding standardized patient (SP) case portrays the progressive course of dementia and simulates a 10-year longitudinal clinical experience between residents and a patient with dementia and her daughter. A total of 134 residents participated in the University of Cincinnati-based curriculum during 2007-2010, 72% of whom were from internal medicine (79) or family medicine (17) residency programs. Seventy-five percent of participants (100) said they intended to provide primary care to older adults in future practice, yet 54% (73) had little or no experience providing medical care to older adults with dementia. RESULTS: Significant improvements in resident proficiency were observed for all self-reported skill items. SPs' evaluations revealed that residents' use of patient-centered language and professionalism significantly improved over the 3 weekly visits. Nearly all participants agreed that the experience enhanced clinical competency in the care of older adults and rated the program as "excellent" or "above average" compared to other learning activities. CONCLUSIONS: Residents found this SP-based curriculum using a longitudinal dementia case realistic and valuable. Residents improved in both self-perceived knowledge of dementia and the use of patient-centered language and professionalism.