HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance patterns in patients failing NNRTI-based treatment: results from a national survey in South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Routine HIV-1 antiretroviral drug resistance testing for patients failing NNRTI-based regimens is not recommended in resource-limited settings. Therefore, surveys are required to monitor resistance profiles in patients failing ART. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted amongst patients failing NNRTI-based regimens in the public sector throughout South Africa. Virological failure was defined as two consecutive HIV-1 viral load results >1000 RNA copies/mL. Pol sequences were obtained using RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing and submitted to Stanford HIVdb v7.0.1. RESULTS: A total of 788 sequences were available for analysis. Most patients failed a tenofovir-based NRTI backbone (74.4%) in combination with efavirenz (82.1%) after median treatment duration of 36 months. K103N (48.9%) and V106M (34.9%) were the most common NNRTI mutations. Only one-third of patients retained full susceptibility to second-generation NNRTIs such as etravirine (36.5%) and rilpivirine (27.3%). After M184V/I (82.7%), K65R was the most common NRTI mutation (45.8%). The prevalence of K65R increased to 57.5% in patients failing a tenofovir regimen without prior stavudine exposure. Cross-resistance to NRTIs was often observed, but did not seem to affect the predicted activity of zidovudine as 82.9% of patients remained fully susceptible to this drug. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of tenofovir-based first-line regimens has dramatically increased the prevalence of K65R mutations in the HIV-1-infected South African population. However, most patients failing tenofovir-based regimens remained fully susceptible to zidovudine. Based on these data, there is currently no need to change either the recommended first- or second-line ART regimens in South Africa.

Prevalence of Antiretroviral Drug Resistance in Patients Who Are Not Responding to Protease Inhibitor-Based Treatment: Results From the First National Survey in South Africa.

Limited data exist on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) resistance in patients who are not responding to protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimens in resource-limited settings. This study assessed resistance profiles in adults across South Africa who were not responding to PI-based regimens. pol sequencing was undertaken and submitted to the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database. At least 1 major PI mutation was detected in 16.4% of 350 participants. A total of 53.4% showed intermediate resistance to darunavir/ritonavir, whereas high-level resistance was not observed. Only 5.2% and 32.8% of participants showed high-level and intermediate resistance to etravirine, respectively. Although the prevalence of major PI mutations was within previously reported ranges, most patients will likely experience virological suppression during receipt of currently available South African third-line regimens.

Evaluation of an affordable HIV-1 virological failure assay and antiretroviral drug resistance genotyping protocol.

HIV-1 RNA viral load is the preferred tool to monitor virological failure during antiretroviral therapy (ART) exposure. Timely detection of virological failure can reduce the prevalence and complexity of HIV-1 drug resistance. This field evaluation further characterizes a two-step approach to identify virological failure, as a measure of ART adherence, and detect HIVDR mutations in the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene of HIV-1. Two hundred and forty-eight (248) samples were tested; 225 from South African HIV-1 participants enrolled in the PharmAccess African Studies to Evaluate Resistance (PASER) cohort, forty of which had paired dried blood spot (DBS) samples and 23 HIV-1 negative samples. A newly developed virological failure assay (ARTA-VFA) was used on all samples, and those with a viral load >5000 RNA copies/ml were genotyped with a shortened RT protocol to detect HIVDR (ARTA-HIVDR(ultralight)). The ARTA-VFA showed good precision and linearity as compared to a commercial reference assay (NucliSENS EasyQ v1.2, Roche) with an R(2) of 0.99. Accuracy studies illustrated standard deviations of <1 log RNA copies/ml for plasma and DBS ARTA-VFA results compared to the reference method. The ARTA-VFA's intended use was to deliver qualitative results either < or >5000 RNA copies/ml. No significant differences in the proportion of results < or > either the 5000 RNA copies/ml or 1000 RNA copies/ml cut-off were noted for plasma indicating either cut-off to be useful. Significant differences were noted in these proportions when DBS were used (P=0.0002), where a 5000 RNA copies/ml cut-off was deemed more appropriate. The sensitivity and specificity of the ARTA-VFA with plasma were 95% and 93% and 91% and 95% for DBS using a 5000 RNA copies/ml cut-off. The ARTA HIVDR(ultralight) assay was reliable for plasma and DBS samples with a viral load >5000 RNA copies/ml, with amplification and sequencing success rates of 91% and 92% respectively for plasma, and 95% and 80% respectively for DBS. HIVDR profiles for plasma and DBS were 100% concordant with the reference assay. This study evaluated a previously described combination of two assays potentially useful in assessing HIV-1 virological failure and resistance, showing good concordance with reference assays. These assays are simple to perform and are affordable, viable options to detect virological failures in certain resource limited settings. The assays' compatibility with DBS sampling extends the access of HIV-1 virological monitoring to more remote settings.

Optimization of a genotypic assay applicable to all human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease and reverse transcriptase subtypes.

Genotypic assays are used often to guide clinicians in decisions concerning the treatment of patients. An optimized sequence-based genotypic assay was used to determine the whole protease and reverse transcriptase (RT) gene, including the gag cleavage site region and RNase H region. Since non-B subtypes are increasing in countries where subtype B was the most prevalent subtype, and treatment becomes more available in developing countries where the epidemic is characterized by a high prevalence of non-B subtypes, it was important that the genotypic test was evaluated using a panel of different subtypes. Amplification was successful for different subtypes: A, B, C, D, F, G, H, J, CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG, CRF11_cpx, CRF13_cpx and an uncharacterized recombinant sample. The detection limit of the PCR was 1000 copies/ml, except for 1 subtype C sample (PL3) and 1 CRF02_AG sample (PL8). The detection limit for these samples was 5000 copies/ml. A sequence could be obtained in both directions for most of the samples.