Analgesic profile of peroral and topical ketoprofen upon low pH-induced muscle pain.

Topical analgesics are widely marketed for treatment of muscle and joint pain. We have recently developed a model of muscle pain and have used this model to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available topical and peroral ketoprofen in order to evaluate the time- and dose-dependence of analgesia. In the present study, we examined the dose- (0, 50, and 100 mg) and time-dependence (hourly to 8 h) of commercially available peroral and topical ketoprofen. In order to achieve infusion times of 8 h (and thus study the time course of analgesic action), we adapted the model of low pH-induced muscle pain in humans to these requirements by applying the infusions continuously for 10 min every hour for 8 h. We found that the 10 min infusion produced reliable and consistent pain levels that were reproducible over the 8 h of the study. The study was performed double-blind, randomized, and with a 1-week interval between each of five different sessions (cross-over). Altogether six volunteers underwent intramuscular infusions of isotonic phosphate-buffered saline solution of pH 5.2; during each 8 h session the infusion was switched on eight times with a duration of 10 min at 50 min intervals (there was no infusion during the 50 min interval). The intramuscular infusion of low pH phosphate buffer induced a localized dull-aching or stinging muscle pain sensation; the flow rate of the pH infusion was individually adjusted to induce pain of a magnitude of 20% on a visual analogue scale (ranging from "no pain" (0%) to "unbearable pain" (100%)). Twenty minutes after starting the infusion the volunteers received a capsule with either a placebo or 50 or 100 mg ketoprofen perorally and, in addition, either placebo gel or 50 or 100 mg of a 2.5% commercial ketoprofen gel was applied topically to the skin. One of the sessions included a placebo gel and an oral placebo. The intensity of the recurrent pain stimulus was significantly reduced by 59% following administration of 100 mg peroral ketoprofen within the first 3 h (P<0.03, Wilcoxon test); this analgesia lasted up to the sixth hour of the experimental protocol. Oral ketoprofen (50 mg) was less effective and reduced the pain intensity by 45% (P<0.05) from only the second to the third hour. In contrast, pain reduction after topical ketoprofen application was not of the same magnitude but appeared to be faster to develop (with a maximum effect within 1 h) on average. The maximum pain suppression with 100 mg topical 2.5% ketoprofen gel was by 51% (significant with P<0.03), while 50 mg topical ketoprofen produced a non-significant reduction of 29%. The apparent analgesia was rapid to develop but transient and pain ratings increased back to baseline values within 3 h for the 100 mg dose and within 2 h for the 50 mg dose. This data suggests that topical application of commercial gel-based systems does not provide long-lasting analgesia in the muscle when compared to perorally-dosed ketoprofen. In addition, the data show that even doses of 100 mg peroral ketoprofen do not provide complete relief of muscle pain.

Dose-dependent competitive block by topical acetylsalicylic and salicylic acid of low pH-induced cutaneous pain.

In a human acid pain model, which uses continuous intradermal pressure infusion of a phosphate-buffered solution (pH 5.2) to induce localized non-adapting pain, the flow was adjusted to result in constant pain ratings of about 20% or 50% on a visual analog scale (VAS). Six volunteers in each group participated in 4 different placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over studies to measure rapidly evolving cutaneous analgesia from topically applied new ointment formulations of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and salicylic acid (SA) as well as of commercial ibuprofen and benzocain creams. Similar, log-linear dose-response curves were found for both ASA and SA, significant in effect at 3 g/kg and higher drug contents and reaching saturation level at 15 or 30 g/kg, respectively, which, 20 min after application, caused a mean pain suppression of 95% using ASA and 80% using SA. Half-maximal effects were achieved using 3 g/kg ASA or 15 g/kg SA. The SA action was also clearly slower to develop. With an increased flow of the acidic buffer, producing lower effective tissue pH and more intense pain, the effect of ASA and SA decreased to 73% pain suppression. A competitive mechanism of both drug effects was suggested by the fact that, with 15 g/kg ASA and SA, pain reduction could be reversed by increasing the buffer flow by a factor of 1.75, on average. Commercial ibuprofen (50 g/kg) and benzocain creams (100 g/kg) were comparably as effective as ASA and SA, but the local anesthetic caused a loss of all cutaneous sensations while the touch threshold (von Frey) under the specific analgesics was the same as under the placebo ointment. Thus, topical applications of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) dissolved in different ointment formulations have proven dose-dependently effective and specific in suppressing experimental acidotic pain by a local and competitive mechanism.

Topical acetylsalicylic, salicylic acid and indomethacin suppress pain from experimental tissue acidosis in human skin.

Topically applied acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), salicylic acid (SA) and indomethacin were tested in an experimental pain model that provides direct nociceptor excitation through cutaneous tissue acidosis. In 30 volunteers, sustained burning pain was produced in the palmar forearm through a continuous intradermal pressure infusion of a phosphate-buffered isotonic solution (pH 5.2). In 5 different, double-blind, randomized cross-over studies with 6 volunteers each, the flow rate of the syringe pump was individually adjusted to result in constant pain ratings of around 20% (50% in study 4) on a visual analog scale (VAS). The painful skin area was then covered with either placebo or the drugs which had been dissolved in diethylether. In the first study on 6 volunteers, ASA (60 mg/ml) or lactose (placebo) in diethylether (10 ml) was applied, using both arms at 3-day intervals. Both treatments resulted in sudden and profound pain relief due to the cooling effect of the evaporating ether. With lactose, however, the mean pain rating was restored close to the baseline within 6-8 min while, with ASA, it remained significantly depressed for the rest of the observation period (another 20 min). This deep analgesia was not accompanied by a loss of tactile sensation. The further studies served to show that indomethacin (4.5 mg/ml) and SA (60 mg/ml) were equally effective as ASA (each 92-96% pain reduction) and that the antinociceptive effects were due to local but not systemic actions, since ASA and SA dis not reach measurable plasma levels up to 3 h after topical applications. With a higher flow rate of acid buffer producing more intense pain (VAS 50%). ASA and SA were still able to significantly reduce the ratings by 90% or 84%, respectively. On the other hand, by increasing the flow rate by a factor of 2 on average, during the period of fully developed drug effect it was possible to overcome the pain suppression, which suggests a competitive mechanism of (acetyl-) salicylic antinociception.