RESUMO
Cancer patients are at high risk of severe COVID-19 with high morbidity and mortality. Further, impaired humoral response renders SARS-CoV-2 vaccines less effective and treatment options are scarce. Randomized trials using convalescent plasma are missing for high-risk patients. Here, we performed a multicenter trial (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2020-001632-10/DE) in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 within four risk groups (1, cancer; 2, immunosuppression; 3, lab-based risk factors; 4, advanced age) randomized to standard of care (CONTROL) or standard of care plus convalescent/vaccinated anti-SARS-CoV-2 plasma (PLASMA). For the four groups combined, PLASMA did not improve clinically compared to CONTROL (HR 1.29; p=0.205). However, cancer patients experienced shortened median time to improvement (HR 2.50, p=0.003) and superior survival in PLASMA vs. CONTROL (HR 0.28; p=0.042). Neutralizing antibody activity increased in PLASMA but not in CONTROL cancer patients (p=0.001). Taken together, convalescent/vaccinated plasma may improve COVID-19 outcome in cancer patients unable to intrinsically generate an adequate immune response.
RESUMO
BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic remains a worldwide challenge. The CRIT-Cov-U pilot study generated a urinary proteomic biomarker consisting of 50 peptides (COV50), which predicted death and disease progression. Following the interim analysis demanded by the German government, the full dataset was analysed to consolidate findings and propose clinical applications. MethodsIn eight European countries, 1012 adults with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 were followed up for death and progression along the 8-point WHO scale. Capillary electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry was used for urinary proteomic profiling. Statistical methods included logistic regression, receiver operating curve analysis with comparison of the area under curve (AUC) between nested models. Hospitalisation costs were derived from the care facility corresponding with the Markov chain probability of reaching WHO scores ranging from 3 to 8 and flat-rate hospitalistion costs standardised across countries. FindingsThe entry WHO scores were 1-3, 4-5 and 6 in 445 (44{middle dot}0%), 529 (52{middle dot}3%), and 38 (3{middle dot}8%) patients, of whom 119 died and 271 progressed. The standardised odds ratios associated with COV50 for death were 2{middle dot}44 (95% CI, 2{middle dot}05-2{middle dot}92) unadjusted and 1{middle dot}67 (1{middle dot}34-2{middle dot}07) if adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, comorbidities and baseline WHO score, and 1{middle dot}79 (1{middle dot}60-2{middle dot}01) and 1{middle dot}63 (1{middle dot}40-1{middle dot}90), respectively, for disease progression (p<0{middle dot}0001 for all). The predictive accuracy of optimised COV50 thresholds were 74{middle dot}4% (95% CI, 71{middle dot}6-77{middle dot}1) for mortality (threshold 0{middle dot}47) and 67{middle dot}4% (64{middle dot}1-70{middle dot}3) for disease progression (threshold 0{middle dot}04). On top of covariables and the baseline WHO score, these thresholds improved AUCs from 0{middle dot}835 to 0{middle dot}853 (p=0{middle dot}0331) and from 0{middle dot}697 to 0{middle dot}730 (p=0{middle dot}0008) for death and progression, respectively. Of 196 ambulatory patients, 194 (99{middle dot}0%) did not reach the 0{middle dot}04 threshold. Earlier intervention guided by high-risk COV50 levels should reduce hospital days with cost reductions expressed per 1000 patient-days ranging from M{euro} 1{middle dot}208 (95% percentile interval, 1{middle dot}035-1{middle dot}406) at low risk (COV50 <0{middle dot}04) to M{euro} 4{middle dot}503 (4{middle dot}107-4{middle dot}864) at high risk (COV50 [≥]0{middle dot}04 and age [≥]65 years). InterpretationThe urinary proteomic COV50 marker is accurate in predicting adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Even in mild-to-moderate PCR-confirmed infections (WHO scores 1-5), the 0{middle dot}04 threshold justifies earlier drug treatment, thereby reducing hospitalisation days and costs. FundingGerman Federal Ministry of Health acting upon a decree from the German Federal Parliament.
RESUMO
ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of multimodal infection control interventions in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infections in healthcare professionals DesignSequential follow-up study SettingLargest tertiary care centre in northern Germany Participants1253 employees of the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf were sequentially assessed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies at the beginning of the covid-19 epidemic (20 March - 9 April), one month (20 April - 8 May), and another two months later (22 June - 24 July). Of those, 1026 were healthcare workers (HCWs) of whom 292 were directly involved in the care of covid-19 patients. During the study period, infection control interventions were deployed, those included i) strict barrier nursing of all known covid-19 patients including FFP2 (N95) masks, goggles, gloves, hoods and protective gowns, ii) visitor restrictions with access control at all hospital entries, iii) mandatory wearing of disposable face masks in all clinical settings, and iv) universal RT-PCR admission screening of patients. Main Outcome MeasuresSARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion rate ResultsAt the initial screening, ten participants displayed significant IgG antibody ratios. Another ten individuals showed seroconversion at the second time point one month later, only two further participants seroconverted during the subsequent two months. The overall SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in the study cohort at the last follow-up was 1.8%, the seroconversion rate dropped from 0.81% to 0.08% per month despite a longer observation period. Amongst HCWs seropositivity was increased in those directly involved in the care of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections (3.8%, n=11) compared to other HCWs (1.4%, n=10, P=0.025). However, after the adoption of all multimodal infection control interventions seroconversions were observed in only two more HCWs, neither of whom were involved in inpatient care. ConclusionMultimodal infection control and prevention interventions are highly effective in mitigating SARS-CoV-2 infections of healthcare professionals.
RESUMO
SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of COVID-19 and is a severe threat to global health. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 show a wide range of symptoms and disease severity, while limited data is available on its immunogenicity. Here, the kinetics of the development of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses in relation to clinical features and dynamics of specific B-cell populations are reported. Immunophenotyping of B cells was performed by flow cytometry with longitudinally collected PBMCs. In parallel, serum samples were analyzed for the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA, IgG, and IgM antibodies using whole proteome peptide microarrays. Soon after disease onset in a mild case, we observed an increased frequency of plasmablasts concomitantly with a strong SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA response. In contrast, a case with more severe progression showed a delayed, but eventually very strong and broad SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA response. This case study shows that determining SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody epitopes can be valuable to monitor the specificity and magnitude of the early B-cell response, which could guide the development of vaccine candidates. Follow-up studies are required to evaluate whether the kinetics and strength of the SARS-CoV-2-specific IgA response could be potential prognostic markers of viral control.
