Treatment outcomes with hypofractionated high-dose radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

AIM: To report the treatment results of a retrospective cohort of prostate cancer patients treated with Hypo-RT with a high equivalent biological effective dose (BED). BACKGROUND: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (Hypo-RT) has gained popularity and interest in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, there are few experiences with adequate follow-up reporting treatment results using high equivalent dose with Hypo-RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assigned 149 men with low-, intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer to receive Hypo-RT with a total dose of 69 Gy/23 fractions. Late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were prospectively evaluated according to modified RTOG criteria. Biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) was defined as the nadir prostate-specific antigen level plus 2 ng/mL. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 53 months. For the entire cohort, the 5-year bNED rate was 94.6%, and for low-, intermediate- and high-risk patients the 5-year bNED was 100%, 96.4%, and 86% (p = 0.007), respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92%. Only 1 patient died from the disease at 48 months after treatment, giving a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 98%. The worst grade ≥2 rate GI and GU toxicity was 13.4% and 14%, respectively. No grade >3 toxicity was observed. The presence of grade ≥2 GI and GU toxicity at the last follow-up was only 1.3% and 3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hypo-RT (69 Gy/23 fractions) with a high equivalent BED produces excellent rates of biochemical control for low, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. The long term GU and GI toxicity rates were considered low and acceptable.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy reduces toxicity with similar biochemical control compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this article was to report the results from a randomized clinical trial comparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with 3-dimensonal conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for the treatment of prostate cancer on a hypofractionated schedule. METHODS: The authors randomly assigned 215 men who had localized prostate cancer to receive hypofractionated radiotherapy to a total dose of 70 grays (Gy) in 25 fractions (at 2.8 Gy per fraction) using either IMRT or 3DCRT. Acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were prospectively evaluated according to modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Biochemical control was defined according to the Phoenix criteria (prostate-specific antigen nadir + 2 ng/mL). RESULTS: In total, 215 patients were enrolled in the IMRT group (n = 109) or the 3DCRT group (n = 106). The 3DCRT arm had a 27% rate of grade ≥ 2 acute GU toxicity compared with a 9% rate in the IMRT arm (P = .001) and a 24% rate of grade ≥ 2 acute GI toxicity compared with a 7% rate in the IMRT arm (P = .001). The maximal rate of grade ≥2 late GU toxicity during the entire period of follow-up was 3.7% in the IMRT group versus 12.3% in the 3DCRT group (P = .02). The maximal rate of grade ≥2 late GI toxicity during the entire follow-up was 6.4% in the IMRT group versus 21.7% in the 3DCRT group (P = .001). The 5-year rate of freedom from biochemical failure was 95.4% in the IMRT arm and 94.3% in the 3DCRT arm (P = .678). CONCLUSIONS: IMRT reduced the delivery of significant radiation doses to the bladder and rectum using a similar target volume. This dosimetric advantage resulted in a lower rate of acute/late grade ≥ 2 GI and GU toxicity for IMRT compared with 3DCRT. Cancer 2016;122:2004-11. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Acute toxicity profile in prostate cancer with conventional and hypofractionated treatment.

PURPOSE: To compare the acute toxicities in radical treatment of prostate cancer between conventional schedule (C-ARM) with 78 Gy/39 fractions and hypofractionation conformal treatment (H-ARM) with 69 Gy/23 fractions. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This prospective double arm study consisted of 217 patients with prostate cancer, 112 in H-ARM and 105 in C-ARM arm. C-ARM received conventional six- field conformal radiotherapy with 78 Gy in 39 fractions while H-ARM received hypofractionation with 69 Gy in 23 fractions. Weekly assessment of acute reactions was done during treatment and with one, and 3 months using RTOG scale. Univariated analysis was performed to evaluate differences between the incidences of acute reaction in the treatment arms. Variables with p value less than 0.1 were included in the multivariated logistic regression. RESULTS: There was no difference between H-ARM versus C-ARM for severity and incidence in genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) acute toxicity. During the treatment comparing H-ARM with C-ARM no differences was observed for GI toxicity (grade 0-3; H-ARM=45.5%, 34%, 18.7% and 1.8% versus C-ARM=47.6%, 35.2%, 17.2% and 0). For acute GU toxicity no difference was detected between H-ARM (grade 0-3; 22.3%, 54.5%, 18.7% and 4.5%) and C-ARM (grade 0-3; 25.8%, 53.3%, 17.1% and 3.8%).At the 3- months follow-up, persistent Grade> =2 acute GU and GI toxicity were 2.5% and 1.8% in H-ARM versus 5.7% and 3% in C-ARM (p>0.05). In univariated and multivariated analyses, there was not any dosimetric predictor for GI and GU toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that hypofractionated radiotherapy achieving high biological effective dose using conformal radiotherapy is feasible for prostate cancer, being well tolerated with minimal severe acute toxicity.

Radiation therapy for Graves' ophthalmopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / Radioterapia para oftalmopatia de Graves: uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise de ensaios clínicos randomizados e controlados

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) with total dose of 20 Gy (RT 20 Gy) in the treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed comparing RT 20 Gy with or without glucocorticoid to clinical treatments for Graves' ophthalmopathy. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and recent relevant journals were searched. Relevant reports were reviewed by two reviewers. Response to radiotherapy was defined as clinical success according to each trial. We also evaluated the quality of life and whether RT to produce fewer side effects than other treatments. RESULTS: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (439 patients) were identified. In the subgroup analysis, the overall response to treatment rates was better for: RT 20 Gy plus glucocorticoid vs glucocorticoids alone, OR=17.5 (CI95% 1.85-250, p=0.04), RT 20 Gy vs sham RT, OR= 3.15 (CI95%1.59-6.23, p=0.003) and RT 20Gy plus intravenous glucocorticoid vs RT 20Gy plus oral glucocorticoid, OR=4.15(CI95% 1.34-12.87, p=0.01). There were no differences between RT 20 Gy versus other fractionations and RT 20 Gy versus glucocorticoid alone. RT 20 Gy with or without glucocorticoids showed an improvement in diplopia grade, visual acuity, optic neuropathy, lid width, proptosis and ocular motility. No difference was seen for costs, intraocular pressure and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Our data have shown that RT 20 Gy should be offered as a valid therapeutic option to patients with moderate to severe ophthalmopathy. The effectiveness of orbital radiotherapy can be increased by the synergistic interaction with glucocorticoids. Moreover, RT 20 Gy is useful to improve a lot of ocular symptoms, excluding intraocular pressure, without any difference in quality of life and costs.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia da radioterapia (RT) com dose total de 20 Gy (RT 20 Gy) no tratamento da oftalmopatia de Graves. MÉTODOS: Uma revisão sistemática e meta-análise de ensaios clínicos randomizados foram realizadas comparando RT 20 Gy, com ou sem glicocorticoides a tratamentos clinicos para a oftalmopatia de Graves. O MEDLINE, EMBASE, bases de dados da Biblioteca Cochrane e recentes de revistas relevantes foram pesquisados. Relatórios relevantes foram revisados por dois revisores. A resposta à radioterapia foi definida através do sucesso clinico de acordo a cada ensaio clínico. Nós também avaliamos a qualidade de vida e se a radioterapia produzia menos efeitos colaterais comparados a outras intervenções. RESULTADOS: Um total de 8 ensaios clínicos randomizados (439 pacientes) foram identificados. Na análise de subgrupo, a resposta global para as taxas de tratamento foi melhor para: RT 20 Gy além de glicocorticoides vs glicocorticoides sozinhos, OR=17,5 (IC95% 1,85-250, p=0,04), RT 20 Gy vs sham RT, OR=3,15 (IC95% 1,59-6,23, p=0,003) e RT 20 Gy além de glicocorticoides por via intravenosa RT 20 Gy além de glicocorticoides orais, OR=4,15 (IC95% 1,34-12,87, p=0,01). Não houve diferenças entre RT 20 Gy contra outros fracionamentos e 20 Gy RT contra glicocorticoides sozinhos. RT 20 Gy, com ou sem glicocorticoides mostraram uma melhoria no grau de diplopia, acuidade visual, neuropatia óptica, abertura palpebral, proptose e da motilidade ocular. Não foi observada diferença para os custos, a pressão intraocular e a qualidade de vida. CONCLUSÃO: Nossos dados mostraram que 20 Gy RT deve ser oferecida como uma opção terapêutica válida para pacientes com moderada a severa oftalmopatia de Graves. A eficácia da radioterapia orbital pode ser aumentada pela interação sinérgica com os glicocorticoides. Além disso, RT 20 Gy é útil para melhorar vários sintomas oculares, excluindo a pressão intraocular, sem qualquer diferença de qualidade de vida.

High-dose conformal radiotherapy reduces prostate cancer-specific mortality: results of a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine in a meta-analysis whether prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), biochemical or clinical failure (BCF), and overall mortality (OM) in men with localized prostate cancer treated with conformal high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT) are better than those in men treated with conventional-dose radiotherapy (CDRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The MEDLINE, Embase, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as the proceedings of annual meetings, were systematically searched to identify randomized, controlled studies comparing conformal HDRT with CDRT for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Five randomized, controlled trials (2508 patients) that met the study criteria were identified. Pooled results from these randomized, controlled trials showed a significant reduction in the incidence of PCSM and BCF rates at 5 years in patients treated with HDRT (p = 0.04 and p < 0.0001, respectively), with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of PCSM and BCF at 5 years of 1.7% and 12.6%, respectively. Two trials evaluated PCSM with 10 years of follow up. The pooled results from these trials showed a statistical benefit for HDRT in terms of PCSM (p = 0.03). In the subgroup analysis, trials that used androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) showed an ARR for BCF of 12.9% (number needed to treat = 7.7, p < 0.00001), whereas trials without ADT had an ARR of 13.6% (number needed to treat = 7, p < 0.00001). There was no difference in the OM rate at 5 and 10 years (p = 0.99 and p = 0.11, respectively) between the groups receiving HDRT and CDRT. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis is the first study to show that HDRT is superior to CDRT in preventing disease progression and prostate cancer-specific death in trials that used conformational technique to increase the total dose. Despite the limitations of our study in evaluating the role of ADT and HDRT, our data show no benefit for HDRT arms in terms of BCF in trials with or without ADT.

Prevention of gynecomastia and breast pain caused by androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: tamoxifen or radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: To determine, in a meta-analysis, whether gynecomastia and breast pain rates in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are reduced if treated with prophylactic radiotherapy (RT) or tamoxifen (TMX). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as proceedings of annual meetings, were systematically searched to identify randomized, controlled studies comparing RT or TMX with observation for men with prostate cancer using ADT. RESULTS: Six RCTs (three RT trials and three TMX trials, N = 777 patients total) were identified that met the study criteria. Pooled results from these RCTs comparing RT vs. observation showed a significant reduction in the incidence of gynecomastia and breast pain rates in patients treated with RT (odds ratio [OR] = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12-0.37, p < 0.0001, and OR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.57, p < 0.0001, respectively). Use of RT resulted in an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 29.4% and 19.9%, with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 3.4 and 5 to avoid one case of gynecomastia and breast pain, respectively. Pooled results from trials comparing TMX vs. observation showed a statistical benefit for breast pain and gynecomastia in favor of TMX arms (OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.02-0.08, p < 0.0001 and OR = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.0-0.14, p < 0.00001). TMX resulted in an ARR = 64.1% and 47.6%, with an NNT of 1.56 and 2.1 to avoid one case of gynecomastia and breast pain, respectively. Considering adverse effects, TMX was 6 times more adverse effects than RT. CONCLUSIONS: Our data have shown that both TMX and RT prevented gynecomastia and breast pain in patients with prostate cancer receiving ADT for prostate cancer. Although TMX was two times more effective in preventing gynecomastia, RT should represent an effective and safe treatment option, to take into account mainly in patients with cardiovascular risk factors or thrombotic diathesis.

Prognostic indexes for brain metastases: which is the most powerful?

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to compare the prognostic indexes (PIs) of patients with brain metastases (BMs) treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) using an artificial neural network. This analysis is important, because it evaluates the prognostic power of each PI to guide clinical decision-making and outcomes research. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective prognostic study was conducted of 412 patients with BMs who underwent WBRT between April 1998 and March 2010. The eligibility criteria for patients included having undergone WBRT or WBRT plus neurosurgery. The data were analyzed using the artificial neural network. The input neural data consisted of all prognostic factors included in the 5 PIs (recursive partitioning analysis, graded prognostic assessment [GPA], basic score for BMs, Rotterdam score, and Germany score). The data set was randomly divided into 300 training and 112 testing examples for survival prediction. All 5 PIs were compared using our database of 412 patients with BMs. The sensibility of the 5 indexes to predict survival according to their input variables was determined statistically using receiver operating characteristic curves. The importance of each variable from each PI was subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: The overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rate was 22%, 10.2%, and 5.1%, respectively. All classes of PIs were significantly associated with survival (recursive partitioning analysis, P < .0001; GPA, P < .0001; basic score for BMs, P = .002; Rotterdam score, P = .001; and Germany score, P < .0001). Comparing the areas under the curves, the GPA was statistically most sensitive in predicting survival (GPA, 86%; recursive partitioning analysis, 81%; basic score for BMs, 79%; Rotterdam, 73%; and Germany score, 77%; P < .001). Among the variables included in each PI, the performance status and presence of extracranial metastases were the most important factors. CONCLUSION: A variety of prognostic models describe the survival of patients with BMs to a more or less satisfactory degree. Among the 5 PIs evaluated in the present study, GPA was the most powerful in predicting survival. Additional studies should include emerging biologic prognostic factors to improve the sensibility of these PIs.

Low or high fractionation dose ß-radiotherapy for pterygium? A randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Postoperative adjuvant treatment using ß-radiotherapy (RT) is a proven technique for reducing the recurrence of pterygium. A randomized trial was conducted to determine whether a low fractionation dose of 2 Gy within 10 fractions would provide local control similar to that after a high fractionation dose of 5 Gy within 7 fractions for surgically resected pterygium. METHODS: A randomized trial was conducted in 200 patients (216 pterygia) between February 2006 and July 2007. Only patients with fresh pterygium resected using a bare sclera method and given RT within 3 days were included. Postoperative RT was delivered using a strontium-90 eye applicator. The pterygia were randomly treated using either 5 Gy within 7 fractions (Group 1) or 2 Gy within 10 fractions (Group 2). The local control rate was calculated from the date of surgery. RESULTS: Of the 216 pterygia included, 112 were allocated to Group 1 and 104 to Group 2. The 3-year local control rate for Groups 1 and 2 was 93.8% and 92.3%, respectively (p = .616). A statistically significant difference for cosmetic effect (p = .034), photophobia (p = .02), irritation (p = .001), and scleromalacia (p = .017) was noted in favor of Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: No better local control rate for postoperative pterygium was obtained using high-dose fractionation vs. low-dose fractionation. However, a low-dose fractionation schedule produced better cosmetic effects and resulted in fewer symptoms than high-dose fractionation. Moreover, pterygia can be safely treated in terms of local recurrence using RT schedules with a biologic effective dose of 24-52.5 Gy(10.).

Radiation therapy for Graves' ophthalmopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) with total dose of 20 Gy (RT 20 Gy) in the treatment of Graves' ophthalmopathy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed comparing RT 20 Gy with or without glucocorticoid to clinical treatments for Graves' ophthalmopathy. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library databases and recent relevant journals were searched. Relevant reports were reviewed by two reviewers. Response to radiotherapy was defined as clinical success according to each trial. We also evaluated the quality of life and whether RT to produce fewer side effects than other treatments. RESULTS: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (439 patients) were identified. In the subgroup analysis, the overall response to treatment rates was better for: RT 20 Gy plus glucocorticoid vs glucocorticoids alone, OR=17.5 (CI95% 1.85-250, p=0.04), RT 20 Gy vs sham RT, OR= 3.15 (CI95%1.59-6.23, p=0.003) and RT 20 Gy plus intravenous glucocorticoid vs RT 20Gy plus oral glucocorticoid, OR=4.15(CI95% 1.34-12.87, p=0.01). There were no differences between RT 20 Gy versus other fractionations and RT 20 Gy versus glucocorticoid alone. RT 20 Gy with or without glucocorticoids showed an improvement in diplopia grade, visual acuity, optic neuropathy, lid width, proptosis and ocular motility. No difference was seen for costs, intraocular pressure and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Our data have shown that RT 20 Gy should be offered as a valid therapeutic option to patients with moderate to severe ophthalmopathy. The effectiveness of orbital radiotherapy can be increased by the synergistic interaction with glucocorticoids. Moreover, RT 20 Gy is useful to improve a lot of ocular symptoms, excluding intraocular pressure, without any difference in quality of life and costs.

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer: Phase I study.

PURPOSE: To define the maximum tolerated dose by describing the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck (LAHN) cancer concomitant to irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with LAHN cancer were enrolled in a prospective, dose-escalation Phase I study. Toxicity was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria score. Maximum tolerated dose was defined when DLT developed in 2 of 6 patients. The starting dose of cisplatin was 20 mg/m(2) and that of gemcitabine was 10 mg/m(2) in 3 patients, with a subsequent dose escalation of 10 mg/m(2) of cisplatin only for 3 new patients. In the next levels, only a dose escalation of gemcitabine with 10 mg/m(2) for each new cohort was used (Level 1, 10 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 20 mg/m(2) of cisplatin; Level 2, 10 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 30 mg/m(2) of cisplatin; and Level 3, 20 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 30 mg/m(2) of cisplatin). Radiation therapy was administered by use of a conformal technique over a period of 6 to 7 weeks in 2.0-Gy daily fractions for 5 consecutive days per week to a total dose of 70 Gy. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2009, 12 patients completing 3 dose levels were included in the study. At Dose Level 3, 1 of 3 patients had DLT with Grade 3 mucositis. Of the next 3 required patients, 2 showed DLT with Grade 3 dermatitis. At a follow-up of 3 months, 10 of 12 evaluable patients (83.3%) obtained a complete response and 1 patient (8.3%) obtained a partial response. Among the complete responders, at a median follow-up of 10 months (range, 6-14 months), 9 patients are alive and disease free. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine at low doses combined with cisplatin is a potent radiosensitizer effective in patients with LAHN cancer. The recommended Phase II dose is 10 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 30 mg/m(2) of cisplatin with an acceptable tolerability profile.

Evaluation of biologic effective dose and schedule of fractionation for preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: meta-analyses and meta-regression.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the risk of local recurrence depends on the biologic effective dose (BED) or fractionation dose in patients with resectable rectal cancer undergoing preoperative radiotherapy (RT) compared with surgery alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. The MEDLINE, Embase, CancerLit, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for evidence. To evaluate the dose-response relationship, we conducted a meta-regression analysis. Four subgroups were created: Group 1, RCTs with a BED >30 Gy(10) and a short RT schedule; Group 2, RCTs with BED >30 Gy(10) and a long RT schedule; Group 3, RCTs with BED ≤ 30 Gy(10) and a short RT schedule; and Group 4, RCTs with BED ≤ 30 Gy(10) and a long RT schedule. RESULTS: Our review identified 21 RCTs, yielding 9,097 patients. The pooled results from these 21 randomized trials of preoperative RT showed a significant reduction in mortality for groups 1 (p = .004) and 2 (p = .03). For local recurrence, the results were also significant in groups 1 (p = .00001) and 2 (p = .00001).The only subgroup that showed a greater sphincter preservation (SP) rate than surgery was group 2 (p = .03). The dose-response curve was linear (p = .006), and RT decreased the risk of local recurrence by about 1.7% for each Gy(10) of BED. CONCLUSION: Our data have shown that RT with a BED of >30 Gy(10) is more efficient in reducing local recurrence and mortality rates than a BED of ≤ 30 Gy(10), independent of the schedule of fractionation used. A long RT schedule with a BED of >30 Gy(10) should be recommended for sphincter preservation.

Higher-than-conventional radiation doses in localized prostate cancer treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To determine in a meta-analysis whether the outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer treated with high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT) are better than those in men treated with conventional-dose radiotherapy (CDRT), by quantifying the effect of the total dose of radiotherapy on biochemical control (BC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as the proceedings of annual meetings, were systematically searched to identify randomized, controlled studies comparing HDRT with CDRT for localized prostate cancer. To evaluate the dose-response relationship, we conducted a meta-regression analysis of BC ratios by means of weighted linear regression. RESULTS: Seven RCTs with a total patient population of 2812 were identified that met the study criteria. Pooled results from these RCTs showed a significant reduction in the incidence of biochemical failure in those patients with prostate cancer treated with HDRT (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the mortality rate (p = 0.38) and specific prostate cancer mortality rates (p = 0.45) between the groups receiving HDRT and CDRT. However, there were more cases of late Grade >2 gastrointestinal toxicity after HDRT than after CDRT. In the subgroup analysis, patients classified as being at low (p = 0.007), intermediate (p < 0.0001), and high risk (p < 0.0001) of biochemical failure all showed a benefit from HDRT. The meta-regression analysis also detected a linear correlation between the total dose of radiotherapy and biochemical failure (BC = -67.3 + [1.8 x radiotherapy total dose in Gy]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that HDRT is superior to CDRT in preventing biochemical failure in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer patients, suggesting that this should be offered as a treatment for all patients, regardless of their risk status.

Whole brain radiotherapy with radiosensitizer for brain metastases.

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with radiosensitizer in comparison with WBRT alone for patients with brain metastases in terms of overall survival, disease progression, response to treatment and adverse effects of treatment. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) was performed in order to compare WBRT with radiosensitizer for brain metastases and WBRT alone. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases, in addition to Trial registers, bibliographic databases, and recent issues of relevant journals were researched. Significant reports were reviewed by two reviewers independently. RESULTS: A total of 8 RCTs, yielding 2317 patients were analyzed. Pooled results from this 8 RCTs of WBRT with radiosensitizer have not shown a meaningful improvement on overall survival compared to WBRT alone OR = 1.03 (95% CI0.84-1.25, p = 0.77). Also, there was no difference in local brain tumor response OR = 0.8(95% CI 0.5 - 1.03) and brain tumor progression (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.9 - 1.3) when the two arms were compared. CONCLUSION: Our data show that WBRT with the following radiosentizers (ionidamine, metronidazole, misonodazole, motexafin gadolinium, BUdr, efaproxiral, thalidomide), have not improved significatively the overall survival, local control and tumor response compared to WBRT alone for brain metastases. However, 2 of them, motexafin- gadolinium and efaproxiral have been shown in recent publications (lung and breast) to have positive action in lung and breast carcinoma brain metastases in association with WBRT.

Long-term results and prognostic factors of fractionated strontium-90 eye applicator for pterygium.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term safety, effectiveness, and prognostic factors of fractionated postoperative beta-irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1993 and 2005, 623 patients with 737 pterygium lesions were treated with a strontium-90 eye applicator after surgical excision. The median follow-up period was 60 months (range, 6.7-139.5). Of the 737 lesions, 644 were primary and 93 were recurrences after surgical removal alone. Fractionated radiotherapy (RT) to a total dose of 35 Gy in five to seven fractions was used. RESULTS: A total of 73 local pterygium recurrences (9.9%) were noted. Of the recurrent cases, 80% were noted within 3 years after treatment. The 5- and 10-year probability of local control was 90% and 88%, respectively. The multivariate analysis for all cases demonstrated that gender, age, total radiation dose, recurrent pterygia, and interval between surgery and RT affected the overall local control rate. Late toxicities that might have been associated with strontium-90 RT included scleromalacia (scleral thinning) in nine eyes, adhesion of the eyelids in eight, cataracts in six, and scleral ulcer in five eyes. CONCLUSION: Fractionated strontium-90 RT to a total dose of approximately 35 Gy in five to seven fractions results in a similar local control rate as higher doses in other series, with an acceptable complication rate.

Elaboraçäo de um protocolo de controle de qualidade em radiodiagnóstico / Development

Introduçäo - Neste trabalho foi aplicado a um equipamento de raios X um protocolo de controle de qualidade baseado na Resoluçäo SS-625/94 e em Normas Internacionais. Materiais e métodos - Foram utilizados vários equipamentos de medida previamente calibrados, tais como: medidor de kVp, teste de ponto focal, "timer", dosímetro clínico, teste de colimador, teste de alinhamento, densitômetro, sensitômetro, etc. Foram determinados: quilovoltagens-pico, ponto focal, exatidäo e reprodutibilidade do tempo de exposiçäo, constância da taxa de exposiçäo, coincidência do campo luminoso com o campo de irradiaçäo, alinhamento vertical, camada semi-redutora, contato tela-filme, controle da processadora e padräo de dose dada ao paciente nos exames realizados no setor de diagnóstico por imagem da Instituiçäo. Resultados - Alguns resultados mostraram discrepâncias com as recomendaçöes nacionais e internacionais. Conclusöes - Sugerimos avaliaçäo periódica em todos os equipamentos da Instituiçäo e ajuste desses equipamentos, de acordo com as recomendaçöes, com o objetivo de produzirmos imagens de boa qualidade que permitam diagnóstico correto, com reduçäo da dose dada ao paciente e diminuiçäo dos custos, devido principalmente à repetiçäo de exames