Diagnostics in tarsal fusion: The theory and practise in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: This study compares the preferences of Dutch orthopaedic surgeons for different diagnostic modalities in performing tarsal fusions versus consensus, evidence or expert opinion reported in the literature. METHODS: A literature search of Medline was performed to obtain evidence-based information on various diagnostic tools. In addition, 89 registered Dutch foot and ankle surgeons were sent a questionnaire concerning the diagnostic modalities use in tarsal fusion. RESULTS: Fifty-eight (65%) questionnaires were returned. The experienced surgeons measured outcomes significantly more often than other surgeons. Diagnostic injections were often used, although scant evidence exists in the literature. Postoperative diagnostics mainly consist of X-ray examination, although there is consensus in the literature that computed tomography is more accurate. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed some surprising discrepancies concerning the use of diagnostic imaging in tarsal fusion. More clinical research is needed to identify the most effective diagnostic imaging modalities so as to encourage their wider adoption.

Does osteoarthritis of the ankle joint progress after triple arthrodesis? A midterm prospective outcome study.

BACKGROUND: Debate exists regarding the effect of triple fusion on the development of osteoarthritis (OA) of the ankle joint. The midterm outcome after triple arthrodesis and the prevalence of OA following triple arthrodesis are reported in this study. The role of alignment in the development of OA was investigated. METHODS: Seventy five patients (87 feet) were evaluated in 2003 and of these, 48 patients (55 feet) were available for second evaluation in 2008. X-rays of the ankles and feet were made prior to surgery, in 2003 and in 2008, and the level of osteoarthritis (OA) was graded with the Kellgren and Lawrence score. Of all postoperative X-rays, the AP and lateral talo first metatarsal angle X-rays were compared. Also, standardized digital photos were made to assess the geometry/alignment. The Foot Function Index (FFI) and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score were completed. In order to investigate the role of the underlying alignment on the aggravation of ankle osteoarthritis, patients were divided into a 'varus' and a 'valgus' group based on the indication for surgery. RESULTS: The outcome scores (AOFAS and FFI) after triple arthrodesis remained stable in the present 7.5-year follow-up study. An important increase of OA of the ankle was not established, 58% of the patients showed no aggravation, 31% one-grade and 2% two-grade increase of OA. A trend was found (P=.063) towards aggravation of OA of the ankle in patients of the varus group with the highest medial arches (persistent cavovarus deformity). CONCLUSION: This study reports minor, not statistically significant, changes of the ankle joint following triple arthrodesis after 7.5 years. Clinical outcome remained stable in time. Clinical relevance It seems that triple arthrodesis as such does not lead to major osteoarthritis of the ankle, given that adequate alignment of the hindfoot is achieved. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, retrospective study.

Outcome After Operative Fusion of the Tarsal Joints: A Systematic Review.

Arthrodesis of 1 or more joints of the hindfoot is performed to treat severe functional impairment due to pain, deformity, and/or instability. Evaluation of the results of hindfoot arthrodesis from the published data has been difficult owing to the great variety of pathologic entities and surgical techniques reported in the studies. A comprehensive search for relevant reports, reference lists, and citation tracking of the included studies was conducted using the PubMed(®), Embase(®), and CINAHL(®) databases. The studies had to have been prospective, included patients with hindfoot problems, evaluated arthrodesis of 1 or more tarsal joints, and had at least 1 of the following primary clinical outcome parameters: pain, function, or complications. Two of us independently selected the relevant studies using predefined criteria and graded the quality of evidence using a 0 to 9 star scale according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 16 prospective case series were included; 5 studies scored 6 stars, 8 scored 5 stars, 2 scored 4 stars, and 1 scored 3 stars. A best evidence synthesis was performed, and improvement in function and pain was found for 3 combinations: talonavicular arthrodesis for rheumatoid arthritis, triple arthrodesis for rheumatoid arthritis, and subtalar arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis showed good results for pain and function, the last especially when performed arthroscopically. The best evidence syntheses revealed good results for pain and function for these disease-operative technique combinations.

Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular anesthetic drug injections are claimed to confirm the localization of the pain in order to treat the pain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a positive effect of injection could be indicative for a successful outcome of future arthrodesis. METHODS: 74 Patients underwent fluoroscopically guided and contrast confirmed anesthetic joint injections for diagnostic reasons. Before and after injection, pain was measured by use of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in rest and after exercise. Pain reduction was expressed as delta VAS (dVAS). Also, the Foot Function Index (FFI) was obtained. Based on the effect of the diagnostic injection and various clinical factors, patients were advised a conservative treatment (conservative group, n = 34) or an arthrodesis of the affected joint (operative group, n = 40). After a median follow-up period of 3.6 years (range 2.1 to 4.3 years) patients were again invited to complete the FFI and VAS in rest and after exercise. For data-analysis purposes the patients were assigned to four different groups, based on the result of injection and the occurrence of surgery. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Mann Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Based on the analysis of the four groups we found that surgery, irrespective of the presence of pain reduction after injection, was related to improvement of VAS and FFI. Patients with conservative treatment always showed worse VAS and FFI scores, even when previous injections showed an improvement of VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopically-guided anesthetic injections of the supposed painful foot-ankle joint seem not to be indicative for a successful outcome of an arthrodesis of the affected joint. However, the sole occurrence of surgery shows a significant difference in VAS and FFI scores, where conservative treatment does not. The local hospital review board granted permission for this study. Ethical approval was not required for this study.