Diagnostic, Structured Classification and Therapeutic Approach in Cystic Pancreatic Lesions: Systematic Findings with Regard to the European Guidelines.

Due to the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging techniques and new technical possibilities, the number of incidentally detected cystic lesions of the pancreas is rapidly increasing in everyday radiological routines. Precise and rapid classification, including targeted therapeutic considerations, is of essential importance. The new European guideline should also support this. This review article provides information on the spectrum of cystic pancreatic lesions, their appearance, and a comparison of morphologic and histologic characteristics. This is done in the context of current literature and clinical value. The recommendations of the European guidelines include statements on conservative management as well as relative and absolute indications for surgery in cystic lesions of the pancreas. The guidelines suggest surgical resection for mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) ≥ 40 mm; furthermore, for symptomatic MCN or imaging signs of malignancy, this is recommended independent of its size (grade IB recommendation). For main duct IPMNs (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms), surgical therapy is always recommended; for branch duct IPMNs, a number of different risk criteria are applicable to evaluate absolute or relative indications for surgery. Based on imaging characteristics of the most common cystic pancreatic lesions, a precise diagnostic classification of the tumor, as well as guidance for further treatment, is possible through radiology.

Computed Tomography-Based Tumor Heterogeneity Analysis Reveals Differences in a Cohort with Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma under Palliative Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Imaging in pancreatic cancer is a challenge, especially regarding therapy response evaluation. Tumor size, attenuation, and perfusion are widely used as parameters for computed tomography (CT) examinations, but are often limited due to blurry tumor borders and missing qualitative parameters. To improve monitoring of therapy response, we tested a new CT-based approach of tumor heterogeneity feature analysis. METHODS: A total of 13 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing abdominal CT according to standard as baseline imaging with clinical follow-up and imaging (median time span 64 days) under systematic therapy (FOLFIRINOX/gemcitabine) were retrospectively analyzed. Progression was defined as new lesions and local tumor spread. Tumor heterogeneity analysis was performed using mintLesion®. Seven different image features referring to image heterogeneity were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with Spearman's rank correlation and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: During follow-up, tumor volume did not significantly change between our groups with overall progression (local and systemic) and progression-free patients (p = 0.661). Mean positivity of pixel values were significantly higher in patients without progression compared to patients with progression (p = 0.030). There was a significant negative correlation between changes in kurtosis and time to local tumor spread (p = 0.008) or systemic progression (p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that analysis of tumor heterogeneity might provide valuable information from routine-acquired images regarding therapy response evaluation. This might help adjusting therapy regimes and could be easily integrated in clinical workflows. Furthermore, this procedure might possibly predict therapy response and, hence could lead the way to find a potential marker for progression-free survival.