The correction of anemia in severe resistant heart failure with erythropoietin and intravenous iron prevents the progression of both the heart and the renal failure and markedly reduces hospitalization.

Both Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) are increasing steadily in the community. We propose that there is a vicious circle established whereby CHF and CRF both cause anemia and the anemia then worsens both the CHF and CRF causing more anemia and so on. We call this the Cardio Renal Anemia (CRA) syndrome. By the combination of active treatment of the CHF and control of the anemia with subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron, the progression of both the CHF and the CRF can be slowed or stopped in most cases, the quality of life improved and the need for recurrent hospitalization reduced. This will involve cooperation between internists, cardiologists, and nephrologists to allow early and maximal therapy of both the CHF and the anemia.

The effect of correction of mild anemia in severe, resistant congestive heart failure using subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron: a randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: This is a randomized controlled study of anemic patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) to assess the effect of correction of the anemia on cardiac and renal function and hospitalization. BACKGROUND: Although mild anemia occurs frequently in patients with CHF, there is very little information about the effect of correcting it with erythropoietin (EPO) and intravenous iron. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with moderate to severe CHF (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III to IV) who had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < or =40% despite maximally tolerated doses of CHF medications and whose hemoglobin (Hb) levels were persistently between 10.0 and 11.5 g% were randomized into two groups. Group A (16 patients) received subcutaneous EPO and IV iron to increase the level of Hb to at least 12.5 g%. In Group B (16 patients) the anemia was not treated. The doses of all the CHF medications were maintained at the maximally tolerated levels except for oral and intravenous (IV) furosemide, whose doses were increased or decreased according to the clinical need. RESULTS: Over a mean of 8.2+/-2.6 months, four patients in Group B and none in Group A died of CHF-related illnesses. The mean NYHA class improved by 42.1% in A and worsened by 11.4% in B. The LVEF increased by 5.5% in A and decreased by 5.4% in B. The serum creatinine did not change in A and increased by 28.6% in B. The need for oral and IV furosemide decreased by 51.3% and 91.3% respectively in A and increased by 28.5% and 28.0% respectively in B. The number of days spent in hospital compared with the same period of time before entering the study decreased by 79.0% in A and increased by 57.6% in B. CONCLUSIONS: When anemia in CHF is treated with EPO and IV iron, a marked improvement in cardiac and patient function is seen, associated with less hospitalization and renal impairment and less need for diuretics.

The effect of i.v. iron alone or in combination with low-dose erythropoietin in the rapid correction of anemia of chronic renal failure in the predialysis period.

BACKGROUND: It is now more and more evident that anemia of predialysis chronic renal failure (CRF) should be actively treated, since long-standing anemia may cause irremediable damage to the heart. The most common form of treatment of this anemia is subcutaneous erythropoietin (EPO). iron (Fe) deficiency can also contribute to anemia in predialysis CRF, and intravenous iron (i.v. Fe) can frequently improve it. It is possible, therefore, that the combination of EPO and i.v. Fe may have an additive effect, and cause a rapid improvement in anemia with relatively small doses of EPO. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was an initial study: to assess the ability of a combination of low-dose EPO and i.v. Fe, given weekly for 5 doses, to correct the anemia of predialysis CRF patients compared to the use of i.v. Fe alone in a randomized study. In the follow-up study: to assess the ability of the maintenance of adequate iron stores for one year to achieve and maintain the target Hct of 35% with the minimum dose of EPO. Initial study: METHOD: Ninety predialysis CRF patients (creatinine clearance 10-40 ml/min/1.73 m2 received either: Group A (45 patients): 200 mg i.v. Fe as Fe sucrose (Venofer, Vifor Int.) once per week for 5 doses in combination with 2,000 international units (IU) EPO (Eprex, Cilag-Janssen), subcutaneously given simultaneously also for 5 doses. Group B (45 patients): the same dose of i.v. Fe as in Group A but without EPO. RESULTS: The mean increase in hematocrit (Hct) and hemoglobin (Hb) by one week after the last dose was greater in group A, 4.54 +/- 2.64% (p < 0.01) and 1.37 +/- 0.84 g% (p < 0.01), respectively, than in Group B, 2.74 +/- 2.72% (p < 0.05) and 0.91 +/- 0.78 g% (p < 0.05), respectively. 80% of those in Group A had an increase in Hct of 3 vol% or more compared to 48.9% in Group B (p < 0.01). 40% of those in Group A reached the target Hct of 35% compared to 28.9% in Group B (p > 0.05). Follow-up study: During a 12-month follow-up period, enough i.v. iron was given to maintain the Hct at 35%, while keeping the serum ferritin at < 400 ug/l and % Fe Sat at < 40%. If the i.v. Fe alone was not capable of maintaining the target Hct, EPO was given in increasing doses. Eighteen patients required dialysis. Of the 72 patients who did not require dialysis, 24 (33.3%) maintained the target Hct with i.v. Fe alone, without EPO. All the remaining 48 patients (66.7%) continued to receive EPO in addition to the i.v. Fe, and 47 achieved and maintained the target Hct with a mean EPO dose of 2,979 +/- 1,326 IU/week. CONCLUSION: The combination of low-dose EPO and i.v. Fe had a rapid and additive effect on the correction of anemia in CRF predialysis patients. Maintaining adequate iron stores with i.v. Fe during a subsequent maintenance phase allowed the target Hct of 35% to be reached and maintained with low-dose EPO in two-thirds of the predialysis patients and with no EPO at all in one-third.

Aggressive therapy of congestive heart failure and associated chronic renal failure with medications and correction of anemia stops or slows the progression of both diseases.

The prevalence of congestive heart failure (CHF) is increasing rapidly in the community. We and others have shown that the prevalence and severity of both anemia and chronic renal failure (CRF) increase steadily with increasing severity of CHF. We have also shown that CHF patients may be resistant to standard drug therapy for CHF as long as the associated anemia is not corrected, and that correction of the anemia with subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron sucrose (Venofer: Vifor International, St. Gallen, Switzerland) may improve both the CHF and CRF and markedly reduce hospitalizations without causing side effects. We report here our experience with correcting anemia in this manner in 126 cases of anemic-resistant CHF patients. As in our previous studies, correction of the anemia improved both CHF and CRF, and reduced hospitalizations. Our studies suggest that correction of even mild anemia in CHF may be an important addition to the treatment of patients with the combination of CHF and CRF.

The use of subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron for the treatment of the anemia of severe, resistant congestive heart failure improves cardiac and renal function and functional cardiac class, and markedly reduces hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the prevalence and severity of anemia in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and the effect of its correction on cardiac and renal function and hospitalization. BACKGROUND: The prevalence and significance of mild anemia in patients with CHF is uncertain, and the role of erythropoietin with intravenous iron supplementation in treating this anemia is unknown. METHODS: In a retrospective study, the records of the 142 patients in our CHF clinic were reviewed to find the prevalence and severity of anemia (hemoglobin [Hb] <12 g). In an intervention study, 26 of these patients, despite maximally tolerated therapy of CHF for at least six months, still had had severe CHF and were also anemic. They were treated with subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron sufficient to increase the Hb to 12 g%. The doses of the CHF medications, except for diuretics, were not changed during the intervention period. RESULTS: The prevalence of anemia in the 142 patients increased with the severity of CHF, reaching 79.1% in those with New York Heart Association class IV. In the intervention study, the anemia of the 26 patients was treated for a mean of 7.2 +/- 5.5 months. The mean Hb level and mean left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly. The mean number of hospitalizations fell by 91.9% compared with a similar period before the study. The New York Heart Association class fell significantly, as did the doses of oral and intravenous furosemide. The rate of fall of the glomerular filtration rate slowed with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anemia is very common in CHF and its successful treatment is associated with a significant improvement in cardiac function, functional class, renal function and in a marked fall in the need for diuretics and hospitalization.

Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of the anemia of moderate to severe chronic renal failure patients not receiving dialysis.

Iron deficiency may develop in hemodialysis patients, especially when erythropoietin is given. The role of iron deficiency in the anemia of predialysis chronic renal failure (CRF), however, is much less clear. We have intravenously (IV) administered iron as ferric saccharate in a total dose of 200 mg elemental iron monthly for 5 months to 33 CRF patients who remained anemic despite oral iron supplementation and who had no laboratory signs of iron overload. None was receiving erythropoietin therapy. In 22 of the patients there was an increase in the hematocrit values by the end of the study. These patients were considered responders to intravenous iron (IV Fe) therapy. In 11 patients the iron administration was not associated with improvement of the anemia (nonresponders). Before onset of the IV Fe therapy there were no differences between the responders and nonresponders with regard to degree of anemia, serum ferritin, iron saturation, renal function, or blood pressure. One additional patient was excluded from the study because of a mild reaction during an IV test dose before the study. No worsening of kidney function and no other side effects were noted. In four patients (three responders and one nonresponder) the control of blood pressure necessitated antihypertensive drug therapy adjustment. In conclusion, IV Fe supplementation in two thirds of anemic CRF patients not receiving dialysis resulted in a significant improvement of the anemia, thus avoiding the necessity of erythropoietin or blood administration. This could be achieved by increasing the plasma ferritin levels to 200 to 400 microns/L and/or increasing the iron saturation to 25% to 35%. Intravenous ferric saccharate appears to be a safe and effective method of administering iron for the correction of anemia in CRF patients not receiving dialysis.