A bioequivalence study of two oral desmopressin tablet formulations.

The present study was carried out to test bioequivalence between two different oral desmopressin formulations. Sixty healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to receive the test (T) and reference (R) drug in a two-period two-sequence, crossover, analyst-blinded study design. Subjects received an oral dose of 400 mug of desmopressin acetate separated by a wash-out period of at least 7 days. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over 12 h in plasma and the maximum concentration (C(max)) were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA) after log transformation. The mean ratios of the T to R drug were within the bioequivalence boundaries with mean values of 1.00 (90% CI: 0.87-1.14) and 1.03 (90% CI: 0.92-1.15) for AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-inf), respectively. For the C(max), the mean ratio of the T to R drug was 0.97 (90% CI: 0.87-1.08). The rate and the extent of oral desmopressin absorption were identical for both formulations. Hence, the desmopressin test tablet met all bioequivalence criteria of the marketed reference desmopressin tablet.

Effect of norepinephrine on cefpirome tissue concentrations in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To test whether norepinephrine (NOR) affects tissue microcirculation and impairs plasma-to-tissue equilibration of antimicrobial agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight healthy male volunteers were enrolled to an analyst-blinded, randomized, two-period two-sequence crossover study. A single intravenous dose of 2 g of cefpirome was administered simultaneously with starting a continuous infusion of NOR (0.16 microg/kg per min) or placebo (PL) over 180 min. The microdialysis technique was used for the assessment of unbound cefpirome concentrations in skeletal muscle tissue and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Free plasma concentrations were related to corresponding tissue concentrations. Haemodynamics were determined by the measurement of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate and forearm blood flow (FBF). RESULTS: Area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC) values of cefpirome for interstitium and plasma were not significantly different between the PL and NOR groups (P > 0.47). Tissue penetration of cefpirome as described by the ratios of the AUCs from 0 to 180 min for tissue to the AUC values for plasma were 0.81 +/- 0.34 for the PL group and 0.80 +/- 0.26 for the NOR group (P > 0.05). Baseline values of MAP, heart rate and FBF were not significantly different between study days. MAP increased significantly following NOR administration from 73.3 +/- 3.5 mmHg at baseline to 94.0 +/- 5.2 mmHg during infusion (P = 0.017). NOR exerted no significant effects on FBF. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that intravenous administration of NOR does not exert a significant effect on peripheral blood flow and tissue penetration of cefpirome in healthy men. This might be attributed to systemic regulatory mechanisms, which probably fully compensate for major changes in blood flow in peripheral tissues.