A multi-institutional European comparative study of open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children with high grade (IV-V) vesicoureteral reflux.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) has been the standard treatment for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) requiring reimplantation. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) is gaining popularity and high success rates have been reported. OBJECTIVE: In this multi-institutional study, we aimed to compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of OUR and RALUR for high-grade (IV + V) VUR in children. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation was performed collecting data from 135 children (0-18 years) who underwent high grade VUR surgical correction at nine European institutions between 01/01/2009 and 01/12/2020, involving either open or robotic approaches. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Patients with lower grades of VUR (≤III), previous history of open or endoscopic ureteral surgery, neurogenic bladder, or refluxing megaureter in need of ureteral tapering were excluded. Pre-, peri- and post-operative data were statistically compared. RESULTS: Overall, 135 children who underwent either OUR (n = 68), or RALUR (n = 67) were included, and their clinic and demographic features were collected. The mean age of the open group was 11 months (interquartile range [IQR] 9.9-16.6 months), in the RALUR group it was 59 months (IQR 29-78mo) (p < 0.01); the open cohort had a weight of 11 kg (IQR 9.9-16.6 kg) while the RALUR group had 19 kg (IQR 13-25 kg) (p < 0.01). No significant differences were found for intraoperative (1.5 % vs 7.5 %, p = 0.09) or for postoperative complication rates (7.4 % vs 9 %, p = 0.15). Favorable outcomes were reported in the RALUR group: shorter time to stooling (1 vs 2 days), fewer indwelling urethral catheter days (1 vs 5 days), perioperative drain insertion time (1 vs 5 days) and a shorter length of hospital stay (2 vs 5 days) (p < 0.01). The success rate was 94.0 % and 98.5 % in the open and RALUR groups, respectively. The long-term clinical success rates from both groups was comparable:42 vs 23 months for open and RALUR, respectively. DISCUSSION: This study reported a large multicentric experience focusing on high grade VUR. Furthermore, this study compares favorably to OUR in a safety analysis. There was also a trend towards higher success rates with RALUR utilizing an extravesical approach which has not been previously reported. CONCLUSION: RALUR is an efficacious and safe platform to use during ureteral reimplantation for high grade VUR. The overall peri-operative and post-operative complication rates are at least equivalent to OUR, but it is associated with a faster functional recovery and time to discharge. Medium to long term success rates are also equivalent to OUR.

[Importance of genetic testing in prostate cancer]. / Stellenwert der genetischen Testung beim Prostatakarzinom.

Due to the increasing accessibility, molecular diagnostics are becoming more important in urology. There are validated predictive and prognostic biomarkers available for prostate cancer. This has clinical implications for screening diagnosis and personalized treatment options. The best known examples are mutations in the DNA damage repair genes breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA2 for which the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib has been approved in 2020. This continuous progress enables a more tumor-specific and personalized treatment for prostate cancer. In order to provide this precision medicine, it is necessary to know the most important basic principles, have a close-knit interdisciplinary cooperation and access to a molecular tumor board due to the increased complexity.

Being born small for gestational age (SGA) might be associated with a higher reoperation rate in proximal hypospadias.

PURPOSE: Being born small for gestational age (SGA) is associated with a higher frequency and more severe forms of hypospadias as well as with potential developmental differences. This study aims to characterize operative outcomes in SGA boys compared to boys born with normal weight and length for gestational age (appropriate/large for gestational age, AGA/LGA). METHODS: Demographic data, hypospadias characteristics, associated pathologies and operative outcomes of boys who underwent hypospadias repair at a single center (10/2012-10/2019) were evaluated. Boys were categorized into SGA and non-SGA, which were then compared using unpaired t-tests and chi square tests. To examine the effect of SGA on reoperative risk, a logistic regression model was applied integrating surgical technique, meatal localization and complex hypospadias (narrow glans/plate, curvature, micropenis, bilateral cryptorchidism). RESULTS: SGA boys accounted for 13.7% (n = 80) of the total cohort (n = 584) and 33% of all proximal hypospadias (n = 99, SGA vs. non-SGA 41.3% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). After a mean follow-up of 18.6 months the reoperation rate for all hypospadias was 17.9% (n = 105). In distal hypospadias there was no difference in reoperation rate between SGA and AGA/LGA boys (p = 0.548, multivariate regression model). For each meatal localization in proximal hypospadias SGA was a significant, independent factor predicting higher reoperation rates (p = 0.019, OR 3.21) in a logistic regression model (Figure ROC). DISCUSSION: Hypospadias surgery carries a substantial risk for unplanned reinterventions. Apart from meatal localization, there are only a few factors (urethral plate quality, glandular diameter, curvature) reported in literature to be associated with reoperative risk. Intrauterine growth retardation associated with SGA might lead to not only a higher probability of proximal hypospadias but also contribute to a higher risk for complications mediated by developmental differences. Whether these findings could help to tailor surgical strategies or adjuvant measures, as for example the application of preoperative hormonal stimulation remains to be determined in future studies. This study is limited by being a single-center series with limited follow-up resulting in some complications probably not yet detected - however, in the same extent in both groups. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, 33% of all proximal hypospadias cases occur in boys born SGA. While the reoperation rate in boys with distal hypospadias was not influenced by SGA status, SGA proved to be an independent predictor of a higher risk of reoperation in those with proximal hypospadias. After validation of these findings in other centers, this could be integrated into counseling and risk-stratification.