Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 14(4): 4045, 2013 Jul 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23835373

RESUMO

Traditionally, total skin electron patients remove all clothing for treatment. It is generally assumed that this is best for the treatment of superficial skin lesions out of concern clothing may significantly perturb dose. We investigate the dosimetric effect of patient gowns and determine the necessity of treating patients naked. Using GAFCHROMIC EBT2 film, dose to a cylindrical phantom was measured with cloth, paper, and tri-layer cloth gowns, compared to no covering. A 6 MeV electron beam with spoiler accessory was used at ~ 4 meters source-to-skin distance. The gantry was angled at 248° and 292°. The phantom was rotated at -60°, 0°, and 60° relative to the beam's central axis, simulating the Stanford technique. This was also repeated for films sandwiched between the phantom's discs. Using a Markus chamber, the effect of air gaps of 0 to 5 cm in cloth and paper gowns was measured. The water equivalent attenuation of the gowns was determined through transmission studies. Compared to no covering, films placed on the phantom surface revealed an average increase of 0.8% in dose for cloth, 1.8% for tri-layered cloth, and 0.7% for paper. Films sandwiched within the phantom showed only slight shift of the percent depth-dose curves. Markus chamber readings revealed 1.4% for tri-layered cloth, and < 0.2% for single layer cloth or paper. Air gaps appeared to have a minimal effect. Transmission measurements found that one layer of cloth is equal to 0.2mm of solid water. Cloth and paper gowns appear to slightly increase the dose to the skin, but will not introduce any significant dose perturbation (<1%). Gowns having folds and extra layers will have a small additional perturbation (<2%). To minimize perturbation, one should smooth out any folds or remove any pockets that form extra layers on the gown.


Assuntos
Elétrons/uso terapêutico , Pele/efeitos da radiação , Irradiação Corporal Total/métodos , Vestuário , Humanos , Micose Fungoide/radioterapia , Papel , Imagens de Fantasmas , Radiometria , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Neoplasias Cutâneas/radioterapia , Têxteis
2.
Radiol Oncol ; 45(2): 132-42, 2011 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22933947

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The GammaPlan(™) treatment planning system (TPS) does not fully account for shutter dose when multiple shots are required to deliver a patient's treatment. The unaccounted exposures to the target site and its periphery are measured in this study. The collected data are compared to a similar effect from the Gamma Knife(®) model 4C. MATERIALS AND METHODS.: A stereotactic head frame was attached to a Leksell(®) 16 cm diameter spherical phantom; using a fiducial-box, CT images of the phantom were acquired and registered in the TPS. Measurements give the relationship of measured dose to the number of repositions with the patient positioning system (PPS) and to the collimator size. An absorbed dose of 10 Gy to the 50% isodose line was prescribed to the target site and all measurements were acquired with an ionization chamber. RESULTS: Measured dose increases with frequency of repositioning and with collimator size. As the radiation sectors transition between the beam on and beam off states, the target receives more shutter dose than the periphery. Shutter doses of 3.53±0.04 and 1.59±0.04 cGy/reposition to the target site are observed for the 16 and 8 mm collimators, respectively. The target periphery receives additional dose that varies depending on its position relative to the target. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation sector motions for the Gamma Knife(®) Perfexion(™) result in an additional dose due to the shutter effect. The magnitude of this exposure is comparable to that measured for the model 4C.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...