Factors influencing the uptake of 18F-fluoroestradiol in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: (18)F-Fluoroestradiol (FES) PET imaging provides a non-invasive method to measure estrogen receptor (ER) expression in tumors. Assessment of factors that could affect the quantitative level of FES uptake is important as part of the validation of FES PET for evaluating regional ER expression in breast cancer. METHODS: This study examines FES uptake in tumors from 312 FES PET scans (239 patients) with documented ER+ primary breast cancer. FES uptake was compared to clinical and laboratory data, treatment prior to or at time of scan, and properties of FES and its metabolism and transport. Linear mixed models were used to explore univariate, threshold-based and multivariate associations. RESULTS: Sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) was inversely associated with FES SUV. Average FES uptake did not differ by levels of plasma estradiol, age or rate of FES metabolism. FES tumor uptake was greater for patients with a higher body mass index (BMI), but this effect did not persist when SUV was corrected for lean body mass (LBM). In multivariate analysis, only plasma SHBG binding was an independent predictor of LBM-adjusted FES SUV. CONCLUSIONS: Calculation of FES SUV, possibly adjusted for LBM, should be sufficient to assess FES uptake for the purpose of inferring ER expression. Pre-menopausal estradiol levels do not appear to interfere with FES uptake. The availability and binding properties of SHBG influence FES uptake and should be measured. Specific activity did not have a clear influence on FES uptake, except perhaps at higher injected mass per kilogram. These results suggest that FES imaging protocols may be simplified without sacrificing the validity of the results.

Site-specific labeling of annexin V with F-18 for apoptosis imaging.

Annexin V is useful in detecting apoptotic cells by binding to phosphatidylserine (PS) that is exposed on the outer surface of the cell membrane during apoptosis. In this study, we examined the labeling of annexin V-128, a mutated form of annexin V that has a single cysteine residue at the NH 2 terminus, with the thiol-selective reagent (18)F-labeling agent N-[4-[(4-[(18)F]fluorobenzylidene)aminooxy]butyl]maleimide ([(18)F]FBABM). We also examined the cell binding affinity of the (18)F-labeled annexin V-128 ([(18)F]FAN-128). [(18)F]FBABM was synthesized in two-step, one-pot method modified from literature procedure. (Toyokuni et al., Bioconjugate Chem. 2003, 14, 1253-1259). The average yield of [(18)F]FBABM was 23 +/- 4% (n = 4, decay-corrected) and the specific activity was approximately 6000 Ci/mmol. The total synthesis time was approximately 92 min. The critical improvement of this study was identifying and then developing a purification method to remove an impurity N-[4-[(4-dimethylaminobenzylidene)aminooxy]butyl]maleimide 4, whose presence dramatically decreased the yield of protein labeling. Conjugation of [(18)F]FBABM with the thiol-containing annexin V-128 gave [(18)F]FAN-128 in 37 +/- 9% yield (n = 4, decay corrected). Erythrocyte binding assay of [(18)F]FAN-128 showed that this modification of annexin V-128 did not compromise its membrane binding affinity. Thus, an in vivo investigation of [ (18)F]FAN-128 as an apoptosis imaging agent is warranted.

Quantitative imaging of estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer with PET and 18F-fluoroestradiol.

UNLABELLED: The PET compound (18)F-fluoroestradiol ((18)F-FES) has been developed and tested as an agent for the imaging of estrogen receptor (ER) expression in vivo. (18)F-FES uptake has been shown to correlate with ER expression assayed in vitro by radioligand binding; however, immunohistochemistry (IHC) rather than radioligand binding is used most often to measure ER expression in clinical practice. We therefore compared (18)F-FES uptake with ER expression assayed in vitro by IHC with both qualitative and semiquantitative measures. METHODS: Seventeen patients with primary or metastatic breast cancer were studied with dynamic (18)F-FES PET; cancer tissue samples, collected close to the time of imaging, were assayed for ER expression by IHC. For each tumor, partial-volume-corrected measures of (18)F-FES uptake were compared with ER expression measured by 3 different ER scoring methods: qualitative scoring (0-3+), the Allred score (0-10), and a computerized IHC index. RESULTS: There was excellent agreement (r = 0.99) between observers using IHC as well as the different methods of measuring ER content (P < 0.001). ER-negative tumors had (18)F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values of less than 1.0, whereas ER-positive tumors had values above 1.1. Correlation coefficients for the different measures of ER content and the different measures of (18)F-FES uptake ranged from 0.57 to 0.73, with the best correlation being between the computerized IHC index and (18)F-FES partial-volume-corrected standardized uptake values. CONCLUSION: Our results showed good agreement between (18)F-FES PET and ER expression measured by IHC. (18)F-FES imaging may be a useful tool for aiding in the assessment of ER status, especially in patients with multiple tumors or for tumors that are difficult to biopsy.

Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: In breast cancer, [(18)F]fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET) correlates with estrogen receptors (ER) expression and predicts response to tamoxifen. We tested the ability of FES-PET imaging to predict response to salvage hormonal treatment in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients, predominantly treated with aromatase inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Initial FES uptake measurements in 47 patients with ER-positive tumors were correlated with subsequent tumor response to 6 months of hormonal treatment. Most patients had bone dominant disease and prior tamoxifen exposure. Response was compared to initial FES-PET uptake, measured qualitatively and quantitatively using standardized uptake value (SUV) and estradiol-binding flux. RESULTS: Eleven of 47 patients (23%) had an objective response. While no patients with absent FES uptake had a response to treatment, the association between qualitative FES-PET results and response was not significant (P = .14). However, quantitative FES uptake and response were significantly associated; zero of 15 patients with initial SUV less than 1.5 responded to hormonal therapy, compared with 11 of 32 patients (34%) with SUV higher than 1.5 (P < .01). In the subset of patients whose tumors did not overexpress HER2/neu, 11 of 24 patients (46%) with SUV higher than 1.5 responded. CONCLUSION: Quantitative FES-PET can predict response to hormonal therapy and may help guide treatment selection. Treatment selection using quantitative FES-PET in our patient series would have increased the rate of response from 23% to 34% overall, and from 29% to 46% in the subset of patients lacking HER2/neu overexpression. A multi-institutional collaborative trial would permit definitive assessment of the value of FES-PET for therapeutic decision making.

Systematic screening of potential beta-cell imaging agents.

The beta-cell loss seen in diabetes mellitus could be monitored clinically by positron emission tomography (PET) if imaging agents were sufficiently specific for beta-cells to overcome the high ratio of non-beta-cell to beta-cell tissue in pancreas. In this report, we present a screening assay for identifying beta-cell-specific compounds that is based on the relative accumulation and retention by islet, INS-1, and exocrine (PANC-1) cells of candidate molecules. Molecules thought to have a high affinity for beta-cells were tested and included glibenclamide, tolbutamide, serotonin, L-DOPA, dopamine, nicotinamide, fluorodeoxyglucose, and fluorodithizone. Glibenclamide and fluorodithizone were the most specific, but the specificity ratios fell well below those needed to attain robust signal to background ratio as a PET imaging agent for quantifying beta-cell mass. In vivo tests of the biodistribution of glibenclamide and fluorodithizone in rats indicated that the compounds were not specifically associated with pancreas, bearing out the predictions of the in vitro screen.