Claims identification of patients with severe cancer-related symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to establish a claims-based mechanism for identifying patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) and high levels of patient-reported cancer-related symptoms who could benefit from engagement with health care programs. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey of patients with mNSCLC was conducted from July 2017 to May 2018. Surveys were mailed to patients who were within 3 months of cancer treatment and enrolled in a Medicare Advantage health plan. METHODS: Pain, fatigue, and sleep disturbance were measured using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Depression was assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Medical claims were linked to survey results to identify comorbidities and assess preindex health care resource utilization. Cluster analysis was used to differentiate patients based on patient-reported pain interference, pain intensity, depression, and sleep disturbance. Logistic regression was used to identify claims-based measures associated with more severe symptoms. RESULTS: For 698 respondents, 2 distinct symptom clusters were identified: a less severe (38.4%) cluster and a more severe (61.6%) cluster. Patients in the more severe cluster were younger, were more frequently dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, and more frequently had prescription fills for opioids. Claims-based factors associated with the more severe cluster included 2 or more 30-day fills for opioids in the prior 6 months, age younger than 75 years, depression diagnosis or antidepressants, bone metastases, and pain-related outpatient visits. CONCLUSIONS: The claims-based factors associated with the severe symptom cluster can enable identification of patients with mNSCLC who could benefit from clinical outreach programs to enhance the care and support provided to these patients.

Initiation of triple therapy maintenance treatment among patients with COPD.

OBJECTIVES: Triple therapy is indicated for patients with very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Use of this treatment in the appropriate patient population is important to ensure optimal outcomes. This study quantified the use of triple therapy and assessed concordance with 2013-2016 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) recommendations within a national health plan. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from a large national health plan. METHODS: To estimate the prevalence of triple therapy using claims data, patients in the first of 2 cohorts were indexed on their first diagnosis of COPD between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014, and required to have 24 months postindex continuous enrollment. To assess concordance with GOLD recommendations, a second cohort was created and indexed on the date of triple therapy initiation between January 1, 2013, and November 30, 2016, and required to have 12 months preindex and 1 month postindex continuous enrollment. For both cohorts, patients were aged 40 years or older, with no International Classification of Diseases code for asthma, cystic fibrosis, or lung cancer during the study period. RESULTS: In the first cohort of 92,248 patients with COPD receiving any COPD maintenance medication, 17% were prescribed triple therapy. In the second cohort (n = 19,645), the majority (60%) of patients on triple therapy were classified as GOLD group A or B (ie, no evidence of any exacerbation or only 1 exacerbation not resulting in hospitalization at baseline). CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that triple therapy was often prescribed among patients classified as GOLD group A or B. Additional research is required, however, to further assess whether these patients may have had an exacerbation that was not evident in claims data. Treatment of COPD should be individualized to optimize outcomes and reduce adverse events.

Using the Healthy Days Measure to Assess Factors Associated with Poor Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with Metastatic Breast, Lung, or Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Health Plan.

This study investigated factors associated with patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthy Days tool for patients with Medicare Advantage undergoing treatment for metastatic breast, lung, and colorectal cancer. In 2015, a total of 6390 patients were mailed surveys regarding factors that may influence their HRQoL, including cancer-related symptoms. HRQoL was measured as the number of physically and mentally unhealthy days experienced in the past 30 days and summed for the total number of unhealthy days. Frequent unhealthy days was defined as ≥14 total unhealthy days in the prior month. Of 1567 respondents, the mean number of total unhealthy days (standard deviation) was 14.0 (11.9) with 46.2% experiencing frequent unhealthy days. On average, patients reported 10.5 (10.5) physically and 6.7 (9.4) mentally unhealthy days. Cancer-related symptoms, particularly pain and fatigue, were significantly associated with increased unhealthy days. In adjusted models, patients with pain had 83% more unhealthy days than patients without pain; patients with fatigue had 104% more unhealthy days than patients without fatigue. Diarrhea/constipation and shortness of breath also were associated with more unhealthy days. Cancer-related symptoms, most notably pain and fatigue, were associated with worse HRQoL for patients with metastatic cancer. Interventions aimed at ameliorating symptoms may improve quality of life for patients undergoing cancer treatment.

External Validation of a COPD Risk Measure in a Commercial and Medicare Population: The COPD Treatment Ratio.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations can accelerate disease progression and lead to higher health care costs. To improve patient survival and reduce cost, risk assessment measures should be developed to identify patients at risk for exacerbations and prevent future exacerbations. OBJECTIVES: To (a) externally validate the COPD treatment ratio (CTR) as a measure of COPD exacerbation risk based on predictive models previously tested and (b) assess the measure's capability to assess risk using only pharmacy claims for use in Medicare Part D programs. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted using the Humana research datasets. Separate assessments were performed using pharmacy-only models that excluded risk factors derived from medical claims. Patients were aged ≥ 40 years, with ≥ 1 inpatient hospitalization or ≥ 2 physician's office, emergency department, or urgent care visits with a COPD diagnosis. Using logistic regression models, risk factors (age, exacerbation history, COPD and concomitant medication use, and comorbidities) were assessed during the baseline period (year 1) and were used to predict the risk of exacerbation during year 2. Continuous and dichotomized CTRs were analyzed. A cut-point of 0.3 was initially used for dichotomizing CTR, and subsequently receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-point for CTR. RESULTS: A total of 92,496 patients were identified, the majority of which (96.2%) were Medicare members with a mean age of 69 years. During the baseline period, 14.0% and 11.2% of patients had ≥ 1 moderate or severe exacerbation, respectively. Overall, the CTR performed well in predicting future COPD exacerbations, especially severe exacerbations. ROC analysis suggested that 0.7 was the optimal cut-point for dichotomizing CTR. Patients with a CTR ≥ 0.7 had a 7.9% (OR = 0.921; 95% CI = 0.852-0.995) lower risk of a severe exacerbation, compared with those with a CTR < 0.7. Stronger effects were seen in pharmacy-only models, with patients 17% less likely to experience a severe exacerbation with a CTR ≥ 0.7 compared with patients with a CTR < 0.7. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated the use of CTR as a modifiable measure of risk of COPD exacerbation in a large commercial and Medicare population and remained a robust predictor when pharmacy-only claims data were available. A CTR of ≥ 0.7 may be a useful target to help reduce the risk of severe exacerbations, and its use by payer or quality organizations has the potential to improve COPD management. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK; study number HO-15-16651). GSK had a role in the study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in the writing of the study report but did not place any restrictions on access to the data or on the statements made in the manuscript. The authors were in full editorial control of publication target journal and content and conclusions, accepted full responsibility for final approval of a manuscript describing this GSK-sponsored research, and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication. Stanford and Lau are employees of GSK and hold GSK stocks/shares. Li and Stemkowski are employees of Comprehensive Health Insights, which was contracted to conduct the study but did not receive funding for manuscript development. This manuscript was presented in part at the American Thoracic Society 2017 International Conference; May 19-24, 2017; Washington, DC.

Retracted: Using the Healthy Days Measure to Assess Factors Associated with Poor Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with Metastatic Breast, Lung, or Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Health Plan.

The article entitled, "Using the Healthy Days Measure to Assess Factors Associated with Poor Health-Related Quality of Life for Patients with Metastatic Breast, Lung, or Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in a Medicare Advantage Health Plan," by Casebeer AW et al, which published online ahead of print in Population Health Management [doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0024], is being retracted by the authors so that they can remove references to the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and republish the article without such references. Dr. Casebeer's team obtained a license to use the MMAS-8 scale from Dr. Morisky prior to conducting the study. Nevertheless, after publication of a separate article in the Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes that also cited the MMAS-8, as the lead author, Dr. Casebeer was contacted by Dr. Morisky who requested that a number of changes be made to the article. Dr. Casebeer and her team have no desire to engage in a dispute with Dr. Morisky and therefore proactively contacted the Editor of Population Health Management and requested that the scale be removed from her published paper. After assessing all of the provided information, the Editor agreed to the authors' request. It is important to note that the retraction of Dr. Casebeer's article is not the result of any misconduct on her part or that of her team. The retraction serves to remove the published version of the article that contains the MMAS-8 scale and a revised version that does not contain the tool or any references to it will be published. The elimination of the scale does not alter the results or conclusions of the study. Population Health Management is committed to upholding the highest standards of peer review and the community it serves.

Impact of Out-of-Pocket Cost on Herpes Zoster Vaccine Uptake: An Observational Study in a Medicare Managed Care Population.

Herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination is approved for adults aged 50+ for the prevention of HZ, but it is underutilized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between out-of-pocket cost and HZ vaccine utilization. Adults aged 65 or older enrolled for at least 12 months in Medicare Advantage/Part D (MAPD) and Medicare Part D only (PDP) plans from 1 January 2007 to 30 June 2014 were selected. Abandonment was defined as a reversed claim for HZ vaccine with no other paid claim within 90 days. Out-of-pocket costs used were actual amounts recorded in the claim. Overall, the HZ vaccine abandonment rate was 7.3%. Mean out-of-pocket costs were higher for individuals who abandoned versus those who did not ($88 (±$55) versus $80 (± $49)). Logistic regression indicated individuals with out-of-pocket costs of $80⁻$90 were 21% more likely (OR = 1.21, 1.16⁻1.27 95% CI), and those with out-of-pocket costs >$90 were 90% more likely (OR = 1.90, 1.85⁻1.96 95% CI) to abandon than those with out-of-pocket costs <$80. The models also suggested that socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in vaccine abandonment existed. Different vaccine targeting efforts and pharmacy benefit design strategies may be needed to increase use, improve adherence, and minimize disparities.

Initiation of Triple Therapy with Multiple Inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Analysis of Treatment Patterns from a U.S. Retrospective Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that real-world treatment patterns of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) do not always follow evidence-based treatment recommendations such as those of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, which recommends treatment escalation based on disease progression. This U.S. database study evaluated treatment patterns in patients with COPD, focusing on time to initiation of triple therapy using multiple inhalers. OBJECTIVES: To (a) estimate time from diagnosis to initiation of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) monotherapy, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) dual therapy, or LAMA/LABA dual therapy; (b) estimate time to initiation of triple therapy from LAMA monotherapy and ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA dual therapies; and (c) estimate the likelihood of patient progression to triple therapy. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of patients with COPD newly started on LAMA monotherapy, ICS/LABA, or LAMA/LABA therapy between July 1, 2010, and March 31, 2013, as identified in Humana's research database. Patients who were fully insured with commercial or Medicare Advantage insurance plans and were aged ≥ 40 years at index with at least 1 hospitalization, 1 emergency department, or 1 medical office visit claim with a COPD diagnosis in the pre-index year were included in the analysis. Time from diagnosis to initiation of index therapy and time to triple therapy after index therapy were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of progression to triple therapy. RESULTS: Of 13,541 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD, 4,000 received LAMA monotherapy; 8,207 received ICS/LABA therapy; and 77 received LAMA/LABA therapy at index; mean time (± SD) from COPD diagnosis to initiation of triple therapy was 178 (± 134) days, 185 (± 130) days, and 252 (± 124) days, respectively. During the study, 28% (n = 1,130) of patients receiving LAMA monotherapy and 20% (n = 1,647) of patients receiving dual therapy (ICS/LABA, n = 1,615; LAMA/LABA, n = 32) progressed to triple therapy. Of the patients who progressed to triple therapy, 63% and 57% of patients receiving monotherapy and dual therapy, respectively, progressed in the 12 months after the index date. In the 12 months before initiation of triple therapy, approximately 50% of patients in the LAMA monotherapy, ICS/LABA, and LAMA/LABA therapy groups had an exacerbation. In the multivariable analysis, discontinuation of therapy, smoking history, and concomitant use of xanthenes and short-acting beta2-agonists were significant predictors of progression from index therapy to triple therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 25% of patients with COPD progressed to triple therapy within 12 months of initiating treatment with monotherapy or dual therapy. Exacerbations were reported in only 50% of these patients, indicating that the other 50% may have escalated to triple therapy for other reasons. Treatment discontinuation, smoking history, the use of a LAMA, and concomitant medication use were significant predictors of progression to triple therapy. DISCLOSURES: This study was a GlaxoSmithKline-sponsored collaborative research study (HO-14-16145). GlaxoSmithKline funded this study and had a role in study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of this report. Stemkowski is a paid employee of Comprehensive Health Insights, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Humana and was contracted to conduct the study. No funding was provided to Comprehensive Health Insights for manuscript development. At the time of the study, Lane and Tao were paid employees of Comprehensive Health Insights. Stanford is an employee of and stockholder in GlaxoSmithKline.

The relationship between comorbidity medication adherence and health related quality of life among patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated that comorbidities compound the adverse influence of cancer on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Comorbidities adversely impact adherence to cancer treatment. Additionally, adherence to medications for comorbidities is positively associated with HRQoL for various diseases. This study used the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthy Days measure of HRQoL to explore the association between HRQoL and adherence to comorbidity medication for elderly patients with cancer and at least one comorbid condition. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey combined with retrospective claims data. Patients with metastatic breast, lung or colorectal cancer were surveyed regarding their HRQoL, comorbidity medication adherence and cancer-related symptoms. Patients reported the number of physical, mental and total unhealthy days in the prior month. The Morisky Medication Adherence 8-point scale was differentiated into moderate/high (> 6) and low (≤ 6) comorbidity medication adherence. RESULTS: Of the 1847 respondents, the mean age was 69.2 years, most were female (66.8%) and the majority of the sample had Medicare coverage (88.2%). Low comorbidity medication adherence was associated with significantly more total, mental and physical unhealthy days. Low comorbidity medication adherence was associated with the presence of patient-reported cancer-related symptoms. Patients reporting low, as compared to moderate/high, comorbidity medication adherence had 23.4% more unhealthy days in adjusted analysis, P = 0.007. CONCLUSION: The positive association between low comorbidity medication adherence and the number of unhealthy days suggests that addressing barriers to comorbidity medication adherence during cancer treatment may be an avenue for improving or maintaining HRQoL for older patients with cancer and comorbid conditions.

The Relationship Between Guideline-Recommended Initiation of Therapy, Outcomes, and Cost for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-recommended therapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) encourages evidence-based treatment; however, there is a knowledge gap regarding the influence of guideline-recommended initiation of therapy on outcomes and cost. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if lack of guideline-recommended initiation of first-line systemic therapy was associated with worse patient outcomes and increased costs for patients with mNSCLC. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, 1,344 Medicare patients with mNSCLC were identified from Humana data. Performance status (PS) was imputed using procedure, diagnosis, and durable medical equipment codes pre-index. Guideline-recommended initiation of therapy was defined as ≥1 cycle of National Comprehensive Cancer Network-recommended first-line therapy based on age and PS or targeted therapies regardless of age and PS. Demographics and clinical characteristics were compared by guideline-recommended initiation of therapy. A Cox model assessed factors associated with 6-month mortality. End-of-life quality of care indicators included hospital admission and oncology infusions 30 days preceding death and were evaluated using logistic regression models. A generalized linear model assessed the relationship between guideline-recommended initiation of therapy and total health care costs in the 6 months post-index controlling for clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics. Logistic models for inpatient stays and emergency department visits were also evaluated. RESULTS: Guideline-recommended therapy initiation was observed in 75.5% of patients. Patients not initiating guideline-recommended therapy were older, with a mean (SD) age of 72.5 (6.7) versus 71.2 (6.2) years (P = 0.001), and more frequently identified as having a low-income subsidy (30.0% vs. 16.4%; P < 0.001). Among the 24.6% of patients who died ≤ 6 months post-index, a greater percentage had not initiated guideline-recommended therapy (28.8% vs. 23.2%; P = 0.040). In adjusted models, PS (not initiation of guideline-recommended therapy) was predictive of mortality (patients with poor PS had an 84% higher probability of death [P = 0.014]). Among decedents, 64.2% were hospitalized, and 33.9% had an oncology-related infusion within 30 days of death, with no differences by guideline-recommended initiation of therapy. These end-of-life quality indicators were not associated with guideline-recommended initiation of therapy in adjusted models. Overall, 47.5% of patients who initiated guideline-recommended therapy were hospitalized compared with 55.0% of patients who did not (P = 0.026). Patients initiating guideline-recommended therapy had higher post-index total and oncology-related health care costs and fewer hospitalizations. In models, these differences in costs and hospitalizations were not associated with initiation of guideline-recommended therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients initiated guideline-recommended therapy, with no differences in mortality and quality of care at the end of life by guideline-recommended initiation of therapy, though adherence beyond treatment initiation was not assessed. Unadjusted hospitalization rates were lower and costs were higher for patients who initiated guideline-recommended therapy. These differences were no longer observed after risk adjustment, suggesting that they may have been influenced by patient characteristics, disease progression, and subsequent treatment decisions. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Genentech. Khoury, Michael, Parikh, and Bunce are employed by Genentech. Casebeer, Drzayich Antol, DeClue, Hopson, Li, and Stemkowski are employed by Comprehensive Health Insights, Humana, which was contracted by Genentech to conduct this study. Sehman is employed by Humana. Based on this research, 2 posters were presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2017 on October 16-19, 2017, in Dallas, Texas. Another poster was also presented at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Annual European Congress on October 29-November 2, 2016, in Vienna, Austria.

An Early View of Real-World Patient Response to Sacubitril/Valsartan: A Retrospective Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

INTRODUCTION: Sacubitril/valsartan has been established as an effective treatment for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction based on clinical trial data; however, little is known about its use or impact in real-world practice. METHODS: This study included data from medical and pharmacy claims and medical records review for patients (n = 200) who initiated sacubitril/valsartan between August 2015 and March 2016 preceding issuance of American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) focused update on new pharmacological therapy for HF (May 2016), which included recommendations for sacubitril/valsartan. A within-subject analysis compared symptoms and healthcare resource utilization before and after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan had multiple comorbidities, and nearly all had previous treatment for HF. Most patients initiated sacubitril/valsartan at the lowest dose of 24/26 mg twice a day (BID), which remained unchanged during the observation period for half of the patients. During the first 6 weeks of treatment, few patients discontinued sacubitril/valsartan treatment (5.5%), and only 17% achieved the target dose of 97/103 mg BID after 4 months of treatment. The proportion of patients with ≥ 1 all-cause inpatient stay decreased significantly between the pre-initiation period (27.5%) and the post-initiation period (17.0%), P = 0.009. Fatigue was noted in 51.8% of patients pre-initiation and 39.5% post-initiation, P = 0.027. Shortness of breath was documented for 66.7% of patients pre-initiation and 51.8% post-initiation, P = 0.008. CONCLUSION: The findings of this real-world investigation suggest sacubitril/valsartan is associated with symptom improvements and a reduction in hospitalizations within 4 months of treatment for patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Does site-of-care for oncology infusion therapy influence treatment patterns, cost, and quality in the United States?

BACKGROUND: The increase in hospital acquisition of community oncology clinics in the US has led to a shift in the site-of-care (SOC) for infusion therapy from the physician office (PO) to the hospital outpatient (HO) setting. OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences by SOC in treatment patterns, quality, and cost among patients with cancer undergoing first-line infusion therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis identified adult patients from Humana medical claims who initiated infusion therapy from 2008-2012 for five common cancer types in which infusion therapy is likely, including early stage breast cancer; metastatic breast, lung, and colorectal cancers; and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Differences by SOC in first-line treatment patterns and quality of care at end-of-life, defined as infusions or hospitalizations 30 days prior to death, were evaluated using Wilcoxon-Rank Sum and Chi-square tests where appropriate. Differences in cost by SOC were evaluated using risk-adjusted generalized linear models. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treatment patterns, quality of care at end of life, healthcare costs. RESULTS: There were differences in duration of therapy and number of infusions for some therapy regimens by SOC, in which patients in the HO had shorter duration of therapy and fewer infusions. There were no differences in quality of care at end-of-life by SOC. Total healthcare costs were 15% higher among patients in HO ($55,965) compared with PO ($48,439), p < .0001. LIMITATIONS: Analyses was restricted to a claims-based population of cancer patients within a health plan. CONCLUSION: This study, in an older, predominantly Medicare Advantage oncology cohort, found differences by SOC in treatment patterns and cost, but not quality. Where differences were found, patients receiving care in the HO had shorter duration of therapy and fewer infusions for specific treatment regimens, but higher healthcare costs than those treated in a PO.

Pharmacotherapy Choice Is Associated with 2-Year Mortality for Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

INTRODUCTION: Factors associated with mortality for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are known; however, the association between initial pharmacotherapy (IPT) and mortality is unclear in real-world settings. METHODS: Using a retrospective design and claims database, 14,359 Medicare patients with HFrEF from August 2010 to July 2015 were identified. Index date was first HF claim. IPT was mono- or combo-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker (BB), hydralazine-nitrate (HN), and aldosterone antagonist (AA) within 1 year post-index. A multivariable time-dependent Cox model estimated associations between IPT and 2-year all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 76 (70-82) years; 45.1% were female. Within 1 month post-index, 61.4% had IPT, 6.1% started after the first month, and 32.4% had no IPT in the first year. Of IPTs, 47.5% were mono-vasodilators (ACEI, ARB or HN), 23.3% mono-vasodilator + BB, 16.9% mono-BB, and 3.5% triple therapy [(ACEI or ARB) + BB + (HN or AA)]. Two-year mortality rate was 27.9%. Compared to mono-vasodilator therapy, patients initiating triple therapy had 29.3% lower risk of 2-year mortality; those on mono-BB or no IPT had higher mortality risk. CONCLUSION: IPT was associated with decreased 2-year mortality risk. Timely consideration of triple IPT therapies may be warranted once HFrEF diagnosis is confirmed. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. located in East Hanover, NJ, USA.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: real-world documentation of functional class.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare medical disease in which patients experience increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and pulmonary arterial pressure that can result in remodeling of the pulmonary vasculature and heart, and eventually lead to right heart failure and death. As PAH progresses, patients become unable to perform even routine daily tasks without severe shortness of breath (dyspnea), fatigue, dizziness, and fainting (syncope). Treatment strategies largely depend on assessment of an individual patient's WHO Functional Class. The aim of the present study was to determine whether PAH functional decline, as described by the WHO Functional class (FC), is associated with increased healthcare costs for patients. METHODS: Patients with a prescription for a FDA-approved treatment for PAH and a medical claim indicating chronic pulmonary heart disease or right heart catheterization were identified from an administrative claims database. Provider-reported data from prior authorization forms required for advanced PAH therapies and medical charts were examined for reported FC. Healthcare resource utilization and costs were the primary outcomes of interest. Costs were accounted in 2014 US dollars ($) from a healthcare payer perspective. RESULTS: Patients with a reported FC-IV were observed to have the worst outcomes; averaging significantly more inpatient admissions, longer average lengths of stay, and more emergency department visits than the other FC sub-groups, resulting in higher medical costs. CONCLUSIONS: Using administrative data to document disease severity, this study replicates and expands on findings obtained from the registry study; disease severity was associated with higher healthcare resource utilization and costs. Stakeholders' implications for patient management are discussed.

Patterns of Care in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Among a U.S. Payer Population with Commercial or Medicare Advantage Membership.

BACKGROUND: Several systemic therapies are now approved for first- and second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines offer physicians evidence-based recommendations for therapy, there are few real-world studies to help inform the utilization of these agents in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To (a) describe the patterns of use associated with systemic therapies for mRCC among Humana members in the United States diagnosed with mRCC, (b) assess consistency with the NCCN guidelines for treatment, and (c) to describe the initial first-line therapy regimen by prescriber specialty and site of care. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using Humana's claims database of commercially insured patients and patients insured by the Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug plan. The study period was from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2013. Patients with mRCC were identified by ICD-9-CM codes 189.0/189.1 and 196.xx to 199.xx; all patients were between 18 and 89 years of age, had received systemic therapy for their disease, and were followed up for 180 days. Outcome measures included choice of initial systemic therapy, starting and ending doses, first-line treatment persistence and compliance, and choice of second-line therapy. Persistence was measured using time to discontinuation of first-line therapy and proportion of days covered (PDC; the ratio of [total days of drug available minus days of supply of last prescription] to [last prescription date minus first prescription date]). Compliance was measured using the medication possession ratio (MPR; the ratio of [total days supply minus days supply of last prescription] to [last prescription date minus first prescription date]). RESULTS: A total of 649 patients met all inclusion criteria; 109 were insured by commercial plans and 540 were insured by Medicare. The mean ± SD age of patients was 68.6 ± 9.4 years, and 68.6% were male; Medicare patients were older than commercial patients (71.7 ± 7.4 vs. 56.6 ± 9.1 years, respectively; P < 0.001). The most common comorbidities among the patient population were hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and heart disease. The majority of patients (68.6%) received an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) as their first line of therapy: 43.9% received sunitinib, 14.0% received sorafenib, 10.0% received pazopanib, and 0.6% received axitinib. Mean ± SD time to discontinuation of first-line TKI treatment was 169.1 ± 29.5 days with sunitinib, 160.3 ± 41.1 days with pazopanib, and 160.1 ± 41.4 days with sorafenib. Other first-line therapies included inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (19.7%) and the antivascular endothelial growth factor agent bevacizumab (9.4%). Among patients receiving mTOR inhibitors, 14.8% were started on temsirolimus and 4.9% were started on everolimus. The median starting and ending doses were the same for each drug except for sunitinib. Mean ± SD times to discontinuation of temsirolimus, everolimus, and bevacizumab were 171.8 ± 26.2, 137.0 ± 62.2, and 150.8 ± 56.0 days, respectively. Persistence on first-line regimen as measured by PDC was high (PDC ≥ 80%) for 89% of oral therapies and 77% of injectable therapies; first-line compliance was high (MPR ≥ 80%) for 77% of oral therapies and 68% of injectables. Among patients who received second-line therapy, the most common regimen was everolimus (29.2%), followed by bevacizumab (19.8%), temsirolimus (15.6%), and sunitinib (13.6%). Specialty codes obtained from the database provider identified internal medicine specialists and oncologists as the most common prescribers of TKIs and mTOR inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of use were similar for each of the prescribed systemic treatments for mRCC, and the majority of patients were highly persistent and compliant with first-line therapies. Time to treatment discontinuation was slightly longer with oral agents compared with injectable drugs.

Enhanced assessment of chest pain and related symptoms in the primary care setting through the use of a novel personalized medicine genomic test: results from a prospective registry study.

Novel approaches for assessing patients with chest pain and related symptoms may improve outpatient care. The REGISTRY I study measured the impact of a personalized gene expression score (GES) on subsequent cardiac referral decisions by primary care providers. Of the 342 stable, nonacute patients evaluated, the mean age was 55 years, 53% were female, and mean (SD) GES was 16 (±10) (range = 1-40). Low GES (≤15), indicating a low current likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), was observed in 49% of patients. After clinical covariate adjustment, each 10-point GES decrease was associated with a 14-fold decreased odds of cardiac referral (P < .0001). Low GES patients had 94% reduced odds of referral relative to elevated GES patients (P < .0001), with follow-up supporting a favorable safety profile. This genomic-based test demonstrated clinical utility by guiding decision making during assessment of symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive CAD.

Impact of exacerbations on health care cost and resource utilization in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with chronic bronchitis from a predominantly Medicare population.

BACKGROUND: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) lead to significant increases in resource utilization and cost to the health care system. COPD patients with chronic bronchitis and a history of exacerbations pose an additional burden to the system. This study examined health care utilization and cost among these patients. METHODS: For this retrospective analysis, data were extracted from a large national health plan with a predominantly Medicare population. This study involved patients who were aged 40-89 years, had been enrolled continuously for 24 months or more, had at least two separate insurance claims for COPD with chronic bronchitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 491.xx), and had pharmacy claims for COPD maintenance medications between January 1, 2007, and March 31, 2009. Two years of data were examined for each patient; the index date was defined as the first occurrence of COPD. Baseline characteristics were obtained from the first year of data, with health outcomes tracked in the second year. Severe exacerbation was defined by COPD-related hospitalization or death; moderate exacerbation was defined by oral or parenteral corticosteroid use. Adjusted numbers of exacerbations and COPD-related costs per patient were estimated controlling for demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: The final study sample involved 8554 patients; mean age was 70.1±8.6 years and 49.8% of the overall population had exacerbation, 13.9% had a severe exacerbation only, 29.1% had a moderate exacerbation only, and 6.8% had both a severe and moderate exacerbation. COPD-related mean annual costs were $4069 (all figures given in US dollars) for the overall population and $6381 for patients with two or more exacerbations. All-cause health care costs were $18,976 for the overall population and $23,901 for patients with history of two or more exacerbations. Severity of exacerbations, presence of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and long-term oxygen use were associated with higher adjusted costs. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that despite treatment with maintenance medications, COPD patients continue to have exacerbations resulting in higher costs. New medications and disease management interventions are warranted to reduce the severity and frequency of exacerbations and the related cost impact of the disease.

Effect of early clopidogrel discontinuation on rehospitalization in acute coronary syndrome: results from two distinct patient populations.

PURPOSE: Results of a study of the association between early discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy and rehospitalization rates among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are reported. SUMMARY: In a retrospective observational study, analyses of two nationally representative cohorts of adults hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or coronary stent insertion were conducted to assess risk factors for ACS-related adverse outcomes (rehospitalization for AMI or coronary revascularization) during the 12 months after completion of an initial 28-day course of clopidogrel therapy. Case data were sourced from a commercial insurance claims database, a pharmacy administrative claims database, and a combined dataset that linked hospital discharge and outpatient service data; a time-varying method was used to differentiate adverse events occurring "on" and "off" clopidogrel therapy. One cohort analysis (n = 42,757) indicated that patients who discontinued clopidogrel early (i.e., within 12 months of index discharge) were at significantly increased risk for ACS-related rehospitalization during the 12-month study period (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.20; p < 0.05). In the other cohort analysis (n = 3,171), early clopidogrel discontinuation was associated with an increased risk of rehospitalization or inpatient death (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.59-1.91; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Observational evidence from analyses of data on two large cohorts of patients with primarily employer-sponsored health insurance suggests that early discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy after hospitalization for AMI or coronary stent insertion is associated with a significant increase in the risk of ACS-related rehospitalization within the 12-month postdischarge period.

Appropriate VTE prophylaxis is associated with lower direct medical costs.

PURPOSE: To calculate and compare the direct medical costs of guideline-recommended prophylaxis with prophylaxis that does not fully adhere with guideline recommendations in a large, real-world population. METHODS: Discharge records were retrieved from the US Premier Perspective™ database (January 2003-December 2003) for patients aged≥40 years with a primary diagnosis of cancer, chronic heart failure, lung disease, or severe infectious disease who received some form of thromboprophylaxis. Univariate analysis and multivariate regression modeling were performed to compare direct medical costs between discharges who received appropriate prophylaxis (correct type, dose, and duration based on sixth edition American College of Chest Physicians [ACCP] recommendations) and partial prophylaxis (not in full accordance with ACCP recommendations). Market segmentation analysis was used to compare costs stratified by hospital and patient characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 683 005 discharges included, 148,171 (21.7%) received appropriate prophylaxis and 534,834 (78.3%) received partial prophylaxis. The total direct unadjusted costs were $15,439 in the appropriate prophylaxis group and $17,763 in the partial prophylaxis group. After adjustment, mean adjusted total costs per discharge were lower for those receiving appropriate prophylaxis ($11,713; 95% confidence interval [CI], $11,675-$11,753) compared with partial prophylaxis ($13,369; 95% CI, $13,332-$13 406; P<0.01). Appropriate prophylaxis appeared to be associated with numerically lower unadjusted costs than partial prophylaxis, regardless of hospital size, rural/urban location, teaching status, and patient age and gender. CONCLUSION: This large, real-world analysis suggests that appropriate prophylaxis, in adherence with ACCP guidelines, is potentially cost-saving compared with partial prophylaxis in at-risk medical patients.

Current concepts in reoperative cardiac surgery.

This article summarizes techniques used in reoperative cardiac surgery, outlines a risk-stratified approach to operative planning, and reviews the literature on outcomes after reoperative valvular and coronary surgery.