Neck and back pain: Differences between patients treated in primary and specialist health care.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare patients with neck and back pain treated by physiotherapists in primary healthcare (PHC) and in departments for physical medicine and rehabilitation in specialist healthcare (SHC) in Norway. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using data from the FYSIOPRIM database in PHC and the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry in SHC. Neck and back pain patients in the period 2014-18 aged ≥ 18 years were included. Demographics, lifestyle and clinical factors were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 8,125 patients were included: 584 in PHC and 7,541 in SHC. Mean age was 47.1 and 45.5 years, respectively, with more females in PHC (72% vs 56%). Low levels of education and physical activity, high workload and receiving social benefits were associated with treatment in SHC. Treatment in SHC was most common from 3 to 12 months' pain duration. Higher pain intensity and lower health-related quality of life were found in patients treated in SHC, no differences were found for psychological distress. CONCLUSION: This is the first study comparing register data in patients with neck and back pain treated in PHC and SHC. Differences were found in pain and health-related quality of life, but levels of psychological distress were similar between patients treated in PHC and those treated in SHC.

Generalized joint hypermobility and risk of pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: does body mass index matter?

BACKGROUND: Women with generalized joint hypermobility may be at increased risk of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain, but evidence is inconclusive. OBJECTIVES: In this prospective cohort study of 283 pregnant women in Norway, we aimed to study the association of generalized joint mobility with pelvic girdle pain, and to evaluate if pre-pregnancy body mass index was a modifier of the association. METHODS: Generalized joint hypermobility was defined as a score of ≥5/9 positive tests on the Beighton score measured in early pregnancy. Primary outcome was evening pain intensity in gestation week 30, measured by a 100 mm visual analogue scale. We applied linear regression analyses to estimate age-adjusted unstandardized beta coefficients. RESULTS: Evening pain intensity was similar among women with Beighton score ≥ 5/9 and women with Beighton score < 5/9 (age-adjusted mean difference 2.8 mm; 95% CI: -9.2 to 14.9 mm). Women with Beighton score ≥ 5/9 and pre-pregnancy body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2, reported higher evening pain than women with Beighton score < 5/9 and pre-pregnancy body mass index <25 kg/m2 (age-adjusted mean difference 28.7 mm; 95% CI: 14.3-43.1 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, evening pain intensity was similar among pregnant women with and without generalized joint hypermobility. However, women with a combination of generalized joint hypermobility and body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 reported higher evening pain compared to women with normal joint mobility and body mass index <25 kg/m2, suggesting that body mass index may modify the association. The estimates could be imprecise due to the small study sample, and our findings should be interpreted with caution.

Impact of job adjustment, pain location and exercise on sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain in pregnancy: a longitudinal study.

Objective: To identify factors associated with sick leave due to lumbopelvic pain (LPP) in pregnancy. Design: Prospective cohort study using participants from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to study the effect of exercise during pregnancy on pregnancy related diseases. Setting: St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital and Stavanger University Hospital, April 2007 to December 2009. Subjects: Healthy pregnant women. Main outcome measures: Self-reported sick leave due to LPP in late pregnancy (gestation week 32-36). Results: In total, 532/716 (74%) women reported LPP at 32-36 weeks of pregnancy, and 197/716 (28%) reported sick leave due to LPP. Not receiving job adjustments when needed (Odds ratio, OR with 95% confidence interval, CI, was 3.0 (1.7-5.4)) and having any pain in the pelvic girdle versus no pain (OR 2.7 (1.3-5.6), OR 2.7 (1.4-5.2) and OR 2.2 (1.04-4.8)) for anterior, posterior and combined anterior and posterior pain in the pelvis respectively, were associated with sick leave due to LPP in late pregnancy. Also higher disability, sick listed due to LPP at inclusion and lower education, were significant explanatory variables. There was a trend of reduced risk for sick leave due to LPP when allocated to the exercise group in the original RCT (OR 0.7 (0.4-1.0)). Conclusion: Facilitating job adjustments when required might keep more pregnant women in employment. Furthermore, pain locations in pelvic area, disability, lower education and being sick listed due to LPP in mid pregnancy are important risk factors for sick leave in late pregnancy. Key points Current awareness: More than half of pregnant women are on sick leave during pregnancy and the most frequently reported cause is lumbopelvic pain. This paper adds: Inability to make job adjustments, pain locations in pelvic area, disability and lower education level were the most important risk factors for sick leave in late pregnancy. Facilitating early job adjustment might be a precaution to keep more pregnant women in work. Allocation to an exercise group tended to reduce the risk of sick leave in late pregnancy.Registration number: Clinical trial gov (NCT00476567).

Which knowledge? An examination of the knowledge at play in physiotherapy with children.

This article explores how knowledge is expressed and enacted in the practice of physiotherapy with children. The empirical material was generated through close observation of seven physiotherapy treatment sessions involving 7 children between 6 and 11 years old and 5 physiotherapists. Observations were undertaken by the first author, whose post-session written notes, along with comments and questions, constitute the database of this article. Through processing and analysis of data, we have written and present three experiential anecdotes as basis for further analysis and discussion. The article shows how children take initiative during therapy and display playful knowledge both of their body, moving capacity and of the equipment and tasks introduced. The physiotherapists seem to tend to emphasize physiological knowledge relating to the body, its functions and the "dangers" of pathological movement patterns. As a result, physiotherapists and child clients appear caught in a kind of stagnant co-existence where their connection and contact are at a standstill and there is little exchange of knowledge between them. We argue that, for therapy with children to develop along qualitative and creative lines, physiotherapists need to explicitly recognize children as humans of knowledge and embrace their playful contributions as significant to therapy.