Impact of Routine Surveillance Imaging on Recurrence in Sinonasal Malignancies.

BACKGROUND/AIM: There is significant variation in post-treatment surveillance imaging for sinonasal malignancies. This study examined the utility of surveillance imaging in detecting recurrence in patients treated for sinonasal malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review on an IRB-approved dataset of patients with sinonasal malignancies treated at a single institution between 2005 to 2021. Patients were categorized into groups based on the frequency of annual imaging and total number of imaging studies. We compared time-to-recurrence between the groups using log-rank test. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered as the threshold for significance. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients were eligible for this study with a median follow up of 42.3 months and 25.8% (n=24) of patients had documented recurrence. Sensitivity and specificity for recurrence based on computed tomography (CT) scans within one year of treatment completion were 50.0% and 19.5%; positron emission tomography/CT was 90.0% and 19.5%; and magnetic resonance imaging was 60.0% and 61.0%, respectively. Regardless of the type of imaging, symptomatic presentation after treatment had a specificity of 91.0% with a positive likelihood ratio of recurrence of 2.95 (95%CI=1.06-8.22). The frequency of scans was not associated with the risk of recurrence (HR=0.55; 95%CI=0.23-1.29, p=0.17). Similarly, no association was noted between the total number of scans and risk of recurrence (HR=0.64; 95%CI=0.27-1.51, p=0.31). CONCLUSION: The total number of frequency of scans within the first year after treatment had no association with time to recurrence of sinonasal malignancies. Symptomatic presentation was strongly associated with recurrence and should be investigated with appropriate imaging.

Long-term outcome of concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation for recurrent and second primary head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To define favorable pretreatment characteristics for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control, and freedom from distant metastasis for patients with recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer treated with concomitant chemotherapy and reirradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our study population comprised a subset of 115 previously irradiated patients without overt metastases from 304 poor-prognosis head-and-neck cancer patients treated in seven consecutive phase I-II protocols. Of the 115 patients, 49, who had undergone surgical resection, were treated with a median of four cycles of concurrent chemotherapy and reirradiation and 66, who had not undergone surgical resection, were treated with a median of five cycles. The following regimens were used: 5-fluorouracil and hydroxyurea concurrent with reirradiation (FHX) (n=14), cisplatin plus FHX (n=23), paclitaxel plus FHX (n=42), gemcitabine plus paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil concurrent with reirradiation (n=26), and irinotecan plus FHX (n=10). RESULTS: The median lifetime radiation dose was 131 Gy. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 67.4 months (range, 18.5-158.7). The median OS and PFS was 11 and 7 months (range, 0.2-158.7), respectively. The 3-year OS, PFS, locoregional control, and freedom from distant metastasis rate was 22%, 33%, 51%, and 61%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified reirradiation dose, triple agent (cisplatin-, paclitaxel-, or gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy), and surgery before protocol treatment as independently prognostic for OS, PFS, and locoregional control. Triple-agent chemotherapy was prognostic for freedom from distant metastasis. Nineteen patients died of treatment-related toxicity, five of these of carotid hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: For recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer, trimodality therapy with surgery, concurrent chemotherapy, and reirradiation for a full second dose offers potential for long-term survival. Owing to the substantial toxicity and lack of an optimal regimen, reirradiation of recurrent head-and-neck cancer should be limited to clinical trials.

An attenuated adenovirus, ONYX-015, as mouthwash therapy for premalignant oral dysplasia.

PURPOSE: Dysplastic lesions of the oral epithelium are known precursors of oral cancer. A significant proportion of oral dysplastic lesions have functional defects in p53 response pathways. The ONYX-015 adenovirus is selectively cytotoxic to cells carrying defects in p53-dependent signaling pathways. The current study sought to establish the feasibility and activity of ONYX-015 administered topically as a mouthwash to patients with clinically apparent and histologically dysplastic lesions of the oral mucosa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 22 patients (19 assessable patients) were enrolled onto the study. ONYX-015 was administered on three different schedules to consecutive cohorts. Biopsies of the involved mucosa were performed to evaluate histologic response and changes in expression of putative markers of malignant potential, including p53, cyclin D1, and Ki-67. Serology was performed to measure antiadenoviral titers. RESULTS: Histologic resolution of dysplasia was seen in seven (37%) of 19 patients, and the grade of dysplasia improved in one additional patient. The majority of responses were transient. No toxicity greater than grade 2 (febrile episode in one patient) was observed. Only one of seven patients demonstrated an increase in circulating antiadenoviral antibody titer while on therapy. Although responding and resistant lesions had similar mean p53 staining at baseline, histologic response correlated with a decrease in p53 positivity over time. Significant changes in cyclin D1 or Ki-67 were not observed. Viral replication was confirmed in two of three lesions examined. CONCLUSION: This novel approach to cancer prevention is tolerable, feasible, and has demonstrable activity.