Community diabetes care. A 10-year perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To compare diabetes care and education at the community level in 1981 and 1991 in order to record progress achieved in the decade of the 1980s, determine if there is a gap that must be closed to reach diabetes-related objectives for 2000, and establish a baseline to which changes stimulated by the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial can be compared. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In eight Michigan communities, representative primary-care physicians (61 in 1981; 68 in 1991) and their diabetic patients (428 and 440) were identified. Communities, physicians, and patients were randomly selected. Participating patients were interviewed and examined in their community or home to assess the kind and extent of diabetes care they had been receiving; their metabolic, nutritional, educational, and psychosocial status; their diabetic history and current status; and other related factors. The diabetic status, care, and education of the 1981 community patients were compared with those of patients studied in 1991. RESULTS: Positive changes in diabetes care and education at the community level from 1981 to 1991 were seen in the areas of patient glucose monitoring, insulin administration practices, hypertension control, exercise recommendations in diabetic management; and smoking rates. Negative changes occurred in the percentage of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients receiving diabetes education and frequency of office visits to the patient's primary-care physician. Changes of indeterminate value included a sharp decline in primary diabetes admissions to the hospital and a decrease in the proportion of NIDDM patients managed with insulin. Many other hoped-for changes from 1981 status, such as screening for retinopathy, foot-care practices, and overall metabolic control of diabetes, did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: The decade of the 1980s produced modest, but not impressive, improvements in diabetes care and education at the community level. Progress must be accelerated if the diabetes-related objectives included in the national targets for health promotion and disease prevention for 2000 are to be met.

The diabetes education experience of randomly selected patients under the care of community physicians.

The purpose of this study was to describe the diabetes education and nutritional counseling received by patients under the active care of community physicians. The study population consisted of 440 patients with diabetes from the practices of 68 primary care physicians in eight Michigan communities. Fifty-eight percent of the sample reported having received diabetes education, and the mean number of years since the most recent education was 4.15 years. Sixty-six percent reported having seen a dietitian. Patients who had received diabetes education scored higher on a basic diabetes knowledge test (70% correct vs 60%) than patients who had not received diabetes education. From 1981 to 1991, a decline was observed in the percentage of patients who reported having received diabetes education (70% to 58%). Although patient education is an integral part of comprehensive diabetes care, too few patients are receiving it. Furthermore, diabetes education often results in less-than-optimal levels of knowledge. The situation has deteriorated over the past 10 years, and patients who are not on insulin typically are the least well served.

Evaluation of an activated patient diabetes education newsletter.

This study evaluated a monthly, activated patient newsletter sent to over 7000 patients in Michigan with diabetes. The newsletter provided concise and action-oriented information about diabetes care. Patients who had signed up to receive the newsletter during the first 4 months of the project (1863) were surveyed to determine how many patients found the newsletter helpful; 80% (1498) of the patients replied. Patients who found the newsletter most helpful were older; had lower incomes, and reported more complications, less understanding of diabetes, and being in poorer overall health. They also were more likely to have non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) than insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We concluded that the activated patient newsletter is a useful public health/patient education intervention for persons with diabetes. Such a newsletter should be part of a coordinated system of ongoing patient care, education, screening, and social and psychological support.

Guidelines vs practice in the delivery of diabetes nutrition care.

The American Dietetic Association and the American Diabetes Association have published recommendations for the nutrition care of people with diabetes. However, the frequency of this care is rarely documented. As part of a study of diabetes care and education practices, the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center collected extensive data from 440 randomly selected adults who receive diabetes care from community physicians. These data provided a basis for comparison between diabetes nutrition care as recommended and as delivered in typical American communities. In this population (mean age = 61 years; 54% women), 89% (393) had non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Of these, 152 were managed with insulin (NIDDM/I) and 241 were not managed with insulin (NIDDM/NI). Most of the NIDDM/NI group was overweight (71%) and had elevated levels of glycated hemoglobin (62%) and serum cholesterol (53%). Yet they were significantly less likely than those with NIDDM/I to see a dietitian. The most frequently reported reason for not seeing a dietitian was that a physician had not referred them (53%). More than 90% of those with NIDDM/I or NIDDM/NI who were referred to a dietitian saw one. Because this population was from randomly selected communities, physicians, and patients, the results are probably generalizable to other regions of the United States. This study shows that in community practice, insulin use is the primary marker of the need for nutrition intervention, and the lack of physician referral to a dietitian is an important barrier to people receiving recommended diabetes nutrition care.

Screening for diabetic retinopathy in communities.

Twelve retinopathy screening clinics serving 489 diabetic patients were conducted in three Michigan communities as part of the outreach effort of the Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center. Screening activities were initiated by local diabetes educators who conducted a program designed to promote detection of diabetic eye disease and increase patient and health care provider awareness of accepted ophthalmic evaluation guidelines. This experience suggests that retinopathy screening clinics can be successfully conducted if health care professionals in the community consider diabetic retinopathy to be a serious problem, one individual is willing to oversee the organizational aspects of the clinic, and an ophthalmologist with laser treatment capability is present or nearby. These clinics are effective in detecting diabetic eye disease and facilitating subsequent patient visits to an ophthalmologist for evaluation in accordance with national recommendations.