Unmet supportive care needs in prostate cancer survivors with advanced disease: A mixed-methods exploration.

Purpose: Men with advanced prostate cancer experience a wide range of side effects from the cancer and its therapies, which have a negative effect on their quality of life (QOL). Few studies have evaluated supportive care needs in these individuals. The purpose of this study was to conduct a holistic supportive care needs assessment among these survivors guided by the Supportive Care Framework for Cancer Care. Methods: Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach, prostate cancer survivors with advanced disease (n = 188) completed a cross-sectional survey. A subset of these survivors (n = 20) participated in an interview to further explore their experience of unmet needs. Results: Survivors reported unmet supportive care needs in every domain of the framework. Up to 95.2% of the survivors had at least one unmet need, with a mean of 14.9 (range: 0-42). Several areas of convergence among the quantitative and qualitative data (fatigue, sexual dysfunction, practical, and emotional/psychological domains), as well as divergence (informational and spiritual domains, depression, urinary dysfunction) were found through the integration process. Conclusions: This study confirms that prostate cancer survivors with advanced disease experience high rates of unmet supportive care needs. The findings also highlight the diversity of those unmet needs. These results may assist with future development of patient-centered supportive care interventions that better meet the specific needs of this vulnerable group of cancer survivors.

Contextual and stress process factors associated with head and neck cancer caregivers' physical and psychological well-being.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) caregivers are especially vulnerable to poor outcomes because the HNC patients are at high risk for physical and functional impairments. This study examines contextual and stress process variables potentially associated with HNC caregivers' physical and psychological well-being. Patient-caregiver variables included socio-demographics, primary stressors (caregiving, patient clinical characteristics, HNC-related symptoms/dysfunction), secondary stressors (caregiver employment, childcare responsibilities and sleep duration <7 hr), appraisal, and response (physical activity). General linear models modeled caregiver well-being, along with depression and anxiety. A total of 33 patient-caregiver dyads were included. Most caregivers were female (81.8%) and patient spouses/partners (72.7%). Factors significantly associated with better caregiver physical well-being included caregiver older age, <2 comorbidities, ≥7 hr of sleep, ≥3 days/week physical activity, and patient swallowing and speech dysfunction. Factors significantly associated with better caregiver mental health functioning were less patient social dysfunction and less perceived caregiving burden. Short nighttime sleep, higher caregiver burden, and <3 days/week physical activity were also significantly related to caregivers' depression and anxiety. Results suggested caregiver behaviors and perceived burden, along with patient HNC concerns are linked with caregiver well-being. These behavioral, cognitive, and patient factors should be incorporated into caregiver screening tools or targeted with behavioral interventions to improve caregiver well-being.

Development of a survivorship needs assessment planning tool for head and neck cancer survivors and their caregivers: a preliminary study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to characterize primary end-of-treatment challenges in head and neck cancer (HNC) to drive the development of a survivorship needs assessment planning (SNAP) tool and evaluate its acceptability and feasibility. METHODS: Using qualitative methods (focus groups, interviews), we identified physical, emotional, and social post-treatment challenges from the perspectives of survivors (N = 17), caregivers (N = 14), and healthcare providers (N = 14) and pretested the SNAP tool. After Advisory Board ratings and consensus, the tool was finalized. RESULTS: Survivors, caregivers and clinicians consistently highlighted the importance of assessing symptoms and functional abilities (e.g., dry mouth, speech/swallowing difficulties, weight loss), health behaviors (e.g., smoking, alcohol), emotional concerns (e.g., depression, isolation, nutritional distress), and social challenges (e.g., support, finances). Caregivers were overwhelmed and intensely focused on survivors' nutrition and trach/feeding tube care while clinicians emphasized financial and access concerns. Most participants were enthusiastic about the tool and directed a flexible care plan design due to variability in dyad needs. Over 75% reported high comfort using and navigating questions on a tablet and were in strong agreement that the care plan would help families practically and emotionally. Coordination of survivorship visits with follow-up care was critical to address travel and time barriers. While survivors and clinicians recommended waiting 1-6 months after treatment, caregivers preferred earlier survivorship visits. CONCLUSIONS: Results pinpointed optimal end-of-treatment domains for routine assessment and support the feasibility of implementing a SNAP tool in the clinic. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Capitalizing on technology to direct HNC survivorship care is promising.