Endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting for relief of pancreatic cancer pain.

INTRODUCTION: Little is known about the effects of endoscopic pancreatic duct (PD) decompression in patients with 'obstructive type' pain from pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty patients with unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas, PD obstruction and postprandial epigastric pain were enrolled. The pain intensity, opioid dose and quality-of-life index were documented pre-treatment and at 4-weekly intervals. PD stenting was attempted in all patients. PD stent change was performed if biliary stents had to be changed or intense pain relapsed. RESULTS: Endoscopic PD drainage was successful in 19/20 patients by placement of a 7 F (n = 9) or 10 F (n = 10) plastic stent. Median follow-up was 16 weeks. Two patients were alive at the end of follow-up. Eleven patients received gemcitabine chemotherapy. The pre-interventional pain score was 6.7 +/- 0.9 points and decreased to 3.1 +/-1.4 points at 4 weeks (P < 0.001). It remained lowered significantly at 8/12 weeks and at the final visit (4.2 +/- 1.5 points, n = 13). The mean pre-stenting fentanyl dose was 85.5 +/- 34.7 microg/h, and it was decreased to 57.9 +/- 39.1 microg/h after 4 weeks (P < 0.01), 60.5 +/- 38.9 microg/h after 8 weeks and 64.1+/-39.8 microg/h (P < 0.01 versus pre-treatment) after 12 weeks but increased to 82.7 +/- 41.3 microg/h (NS) at the final visit. The quality-of-life index improved 4 weeks after stenting (from 4.8+/-1 to 6.2+/-1.5 points, P < 0.01) but was lowered to 5.5 +/- 2.3 points at 12 weeks (NS). The response was independent of stent diameter and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: PD stenting achieved significant pain relief and short-term improvement of the quality of life in the majority of patients with PD obstruction due to pancreatic carcinoma.

Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Adequate patient sedation is mandatory for diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this respect it is known that the short-acting anesthetic propofol offers certain potential advantages for sedation during ERCP, but there are no controlled studies concerning the feasibility and safety of propofol sedation in elderly, high-risk patients. METHODS: One hundred and fifty consecutive patients aged >or=80 yr with high comorbidity (ASA score >or=III: 91 %), randomly received midazolam plus meperidine (n = 75) or propofol alone (n = 75) for sedation during ERCP. Vital signs were continuously monitored and procedure-related parameters, recovery time, and quality as well as patients' cooperation and tolerance of the procedure were assessed. RESULTS: Clinically relevant changes in vital signs were observed at comparable frequencies with a temporary oxygen desaturation (<90%) occurring in eight patients in the propofol-group and seven patients receiving midazolam/meperidine (n.s.). Hypotension was documented in two patients in the propofol group and one patient receiving midazolam/meperidine. Propofol provided a significantly better patient cooperation than midazolam/meperidine (p < 0.01), but the procedure tolerability was rated nearly the same by both groups. Mean recovery time was significantly shorter in the propofol group (22 +/- 7 min vs 31 +/- 8 min for midazolam/meperidine (p < 0.01)) while the recovery score was significantly higher under propofol (8.3 +/- 1.2 vs 6.1 +/- 1.1(p < 0.01)). During recovery a significant lower number of desaturation events (<90%) were observed in the propofol group (12%) than in the midazolam/meperidine group (26%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Under careful monitoring the use of propofol for sedation during ERCP is superior to midazolam/meperidine even in high-risk octogenarians.

Endoscopic debridement of paraesophageal, mediastinal abscesses: a prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinal abscesses after esophageal perforation or postoperative leakage nearly always require surgical intervention. METHODS: Patients with paraesophageal abscesses were treated with EUS-guided or endoscopic mediastinal puncture if the abscess was >2 cm and sepsis was present. Abscess cavities were entered with a 9.5-mm endoscope after balloon dilation to allow irrigation and drainage. Debris was removed with a Dormia basket. Concomitant pleural effusions were treated with transthoracic drains. Patients received intravenous antibiotics and enteral/parenteral nutrition. RESULTS: Twenty patients fulfilled the entry criteria. Simple drainage was sufficient in 4 cases, and puncture was impossible in one case. Of the 15 treated patients (age 39-76 years, 5 women) the etiology of perforation was Boerhaave's syndrome (n = 8), anastomotic leak (n = 3), and iatrogenic perforation (n = 4). Debridement was successful in all cases and required a median of 5 daily sessions (range 3-10). All patients became apyrexial, with a C-reactive protein < 5 mg/L within a median of 4 days (range 2-8 days). Esophageal defects were closed with endoclips (n = 7), fibrin glue (n = 4), metal stents (n = 1), or spontaneously healed (n = 3). One patient died from a massive pulmonary embolism one day after successful debridement (mortality 7%). No other complications were seen. Median follow-up was 12 months (range 3-40 months). CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative endoscopic transesophageal debridement of mediastinal abscesses appears safe and effective.

Hemorrhoidal elastic band ligation with flexible videoendoscopes: a prospective, randomized comparison with the conventional technique that uses rigid proctoscopes.

BACKGROUND: Elastic band ligation by means of a rigid proctoscope is the treatment of choice for patients with symptoms caused by internal hemorrhoids of grade 2 to 3. In contrast to the flexible videoendoscope, the rigid proctoscope has limited maneuverability, has a narrower field of view, and does not allow adequate documentation. Therefore, a randomized trial was conducted to compare the safety and the efficacy of conventional elastic band ligation with videoendoscopic elastic band ligation. METHODS: A total of 100 consecutive patients (mean age 47 [12] years) with chronically bleeding grade 2 or 3 internal hemorrhoids were randomized to elastic band ligation or videoendoscopic elastic band ligation. For videoendoscopic elastic band ligation, a reusable multiband ligator was attached to the end of a therapeutic upper videoendoscope. From one to 3 bands were placed per session in both groups. Re-treatment was performed every 2 to 3 weeks in both groups until cessation of bleeding and eradication of the hemorrhoids (at least grade 2) were achieved. Thereafter, the patients were followed to assess complications and efficacy. Recurrent bleeding was considered a treatment failure. RESULTS: To achieve the desired therapeutic aims, a significantly lower number of treatment sessions was required in the videoendoscopic elastic band ligation group (1.8 [0.8] vs. 2.4 [0.9]; p < 0.01) and the total number of bands applied was significantly less (2.8 [1.1] vs. 3.7 [1.4]; p < 0.01). Pain was noted after ligation by 25% of patients in the elastic band ligation group compared with 27% of those who had videoendoscopic elastic band ligation. However, analgesic medications were required in only 7% after elastic band ligation and 9% after videoendoscopic elastic band ligation (NS). Post-ligation bleeding that had to be treated endoscopically occurred in 3.5% of the patients of the elastic band ligation group and 3.2% of those in the videoendoscopic elastic band ligation group (NS). Blood transfusion was not required. At a median follow-up of 12 months, there was no recurrence of bleeding in 40 patients (80%) in the conventional elastic band ligation group vs. 43 (86%) in the videoendoscopic elastic band ligation (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term efficacy and safety of conventional elastic band ligation and videoendoscopic elastic band ligation are highly comparable. However, when videoendoscopic elastic band ligation is performed, significantly fewer treatment sessions are required.

Electroencephalogram monitoring facilitates sedation with propofol for routine ERCP: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopy with the patient under sedation with propofol requires careful monitoring of patient consciousness and vital signs to achieve the desired hypnotic effect without overdosage. Because level of consciousness is difficult to judge by clinical observation alone, electroencephalogram monitoring has been used to guide general anesthesia. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients (mean [SD] age 62 [14] years) undergoing ERCP for various indications were randomly allocated to 2 groups. In group A (n = 40), propofol sedation was guided by conventional monitoring (heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, electrocardiogram), whereas electroencephalogram monitoring was performed but not displayed to the physician who administered the drug. In group B (n = 40), electroencephalogram monitoring was displayed online and used to guide propofol administration to maintain a preselected sedation level. Procedure-related parameters, recovery time, and quality (postanesthesia recovery score), as well as patient cooperation and tolerance for the procedure (visual analog scale) were prospectively assessed. RESULTS: The groups were comparable with regard to demographic, clinical, and procedure-related parameters. Mean propofol dose was significantly lower in group B than in group A (respectively, 290 [158] mg vs. 374 [166] mg; p = 0.02). The mean decrease in arterial blood pressure was significantly lower in group B than in group A (respectively, 11 [6] mm Hg vs. 14 [7] mm Hg; p < 0.05). Clinically relevant changes in vital signs to below critical values were observed in both groups, albeit infrequently. Efficacy of sedation was also rated similar in both groups, whereas mean recovery time was significantly faster in group B than in group A (respectively, 16 [7] minutes vs. 20 [8] minutes; p = 0.02). Accordingly, the recovery score tended to be better in group B compared with group A (respectively, 8.4 [1.0] points vs. 8.0 [0.9] points; p = 0.06). The predefined target level of sedation was maintained during 75% of the procedure time in group B but in only 58% of the time in group A (p < 0.05), and deeper sedation levels were achieved significantly more often in group B patients compared with group A patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Electroencephalogram monitoring enables more effective titration of propofol dosage for sedation during endoscopy and is, therefore, associated with faster patient recovery.