Small steps of improvement in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) within two decades: a comprehensive analysis of 484 patients.

BACKGROUND: It is not clear whether or not the fate of patients suffering from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has improved. To better understand the course of disease, we aimed at documenting disease features at initial diagnosis, sequences of therapy modalities and outcome in consecutive patients over two decades. We postulated that SCLC patients might have benefitted from refined diagnosis and treatment options during the last decade. METHODS: All SCLC cases diagnosed at the Innsbruck University Hospital and associated institutions between 1991 and 2011 have been documented in detail in accordance with a prespecified protocol. RESULTS: A total of 484 patients diagnosed with SCLC were followed. The most important symptoms at initial diagnosis were cough, dyspnea and tumor pain in 55%, 51% and 44%, respectively. Patients who were operated during early stage of disease (n = 26) had a favorable 5-year, relapse-free survival (74%). A total of 112 patients with locally advanced disease were treated by radiochemotherapy in curative intent (RCT), and achievement of CR offered a chance of long term overall survival (OS), reaching 44% after 10-years. In the palliative setting (median OS in 304 evaluable patients, 9.7 months), a therapeutic progress in the more recent decade could not be observed. Parameters independently associated with favorable OS were: response to therapy and prophylactic brain irradiation in patients with RCT; and response, age < 70 years and absence of LDH elevation in the palliative setting. CONCLUSIONS: In this comprehensive view on SCLC, the findings on symptomatology, comorbidity, and spectrum of treatments may help to better understand individual courses of the disease. Overall, modern medicine failed to translate into substantial benefit of SCLC patients, except in patients in locally advanced disease receiving multimodal therapy.

[Rupture of the spleen. Clinicopathological correlations and diagnostic procedures]. / Milzruptur. Klinisch-pathologische Zusammenhänge und Diagnostik.

Though rare, splenic rupture is the most common indication for splenectomy. In the vast majority of cases ruptures are clearly related to trauma (traumatic ruptures); in other cases there is a pre-existing disease affecting the spleen (pathologic ruptures); and in a minority of patients no obvious reason can be identified (spontaneous ruptures). In approximately 10% of cases an iatrogenic cause, in the broadest sense (including side effects of drugs), and relevant histological findings (approximately half of which will be unexpected) can be anticipated. Knowledge of pathophysiological aspects of splenic rupture and assessment of simple macroscopic findings such as splenic dimensions and weight, and information on macroscopically visible lesions are of key diagnostic importance, as is accurate microscopic examination with targeted histological pattern analysis, supplemented as appropriate by histo- and immunohistochemical studies on adequately prepared material.