MCH-Based Semiochemical Repellents for Protecting Engelmann Spruce Trees From Dendroctonus rufipennis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).

Spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is a lethal pest of spruce trees in North America. Despite decades of research, a semiochemical repellent that consistently and effectively protects spruce trees remains elusive. We evaluated the efficacy of 3-methyl-2-cyclohexen-1-one (MCH) in a proprietary, volatile compound release technology (SPLAT) alone and with two adjuvants, Acer kairomone blend (AKB) and acetophenone + green leaf volatiles (PLUS) to protect individually treated Picea engelmannii Parry ex. Engelm. (Pinales: Pinaceae), and Pi. engelmannii within 11.3-m radius of the individually treated trees from colonization and mortality attributed to D. rufipennis in western Wyoming. Ninety-one Pi. engelmannii were baited with frontalin and randomly assigned to one of seven treatments (n = 13): 3.5 g of MCH applied as SPLAT MCH (SPLAT3.5), 3.5AKB, 3.5PLUS, 7 g of MCH applied as SPLAT MCH (SPLAT7), 7AKB, 7PLUS, and baited control (bait only). All repellents except SPLAT3.5 and SPLAT7 significantly reduced colonization of individually treated Pi. engelmannii compared to the baited control. 3.5PLUS, 7AKB, and 7PLUS reduced colonization most effectively, and all repellents significantly reduced mortality of individually treated Pi. engelmannii compared to the baited control. All repellents also significantly reduced colonization and mortality of neighboring Pi. engelmannii.

Lethal Trap Trees and Semiochemical Repellents as Area Host Protection Strategies for Spruce Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in Utah.

We tested lethal trap trees and repellent semiochemicals as area treatments to protect host trees from spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) attacks. Lethal trap tree treatments ("spray treatment") combined a spruce beetle bait with carbaryl treatment of the baited spruce. Repellent treatments ("spray-repellent") combined a baited lethal trap tree within a 16-m grid of MCH (3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one) and two novel spruce beetle repellents. After beetle flight, we surveyed all trees within 50 m of plot center, stratified by 10-m radius subplots, and compared attack rates to those from baited and unbaited control plots. Compared to the baited controls, spruce in the spray treatment had significantly reduced likelihood of a more severe attack classification (e.g., mass-attacked over strip-attacked or unsuccessful-attacked over unattacked). Because spruce in the spray treatment also had significantly heightened probability of more severe attack classification than those in the unbaited controls, however, we do not recommend lethal trap trees as a stand-alone beetle suppression strategy for epidemic beetle populations. Spruce in the spray-repellent treatment were slightly more likely to be classified as more severely attacked within 30 m of plot center compared to unbaited controls but, overall, had reduced probabilities of beetle attack over the entire 50-m radius plots. The semiochemical repellents deployed in this study were effective at reducing attacks on spruce within treated plots despite the presence of a centrally located spruce beetle bait. Further testing will be required to clarify operational protocols such as dose, elution rate, and release device spacing.