Determining fall risk change throughout pregnancy: the accuracy of postpartum survey and relationship to fall efficacy.

All epidemiological studies on pregnancy fall risk to date have relied on postpartum recall. This study investigated the accuracy of postpartum recall of falls that were reported during pregnancy, including assessment of fall efficacy as a possible reason for recall inaccuracy. Twenty participants reported fall experiences weekly during pregnancy, but one participant was excluded as an outlier. A fall efficacy questionnaire was completed every six weeks during pregnancy. A postpartum survey to mimic previous studies (Dunning, Lemasters, and Bhattacharya 2010; Dunning et al. 2003) was delivered to determine recall accuracy. Postpartum recall of fall events each gestational month matches the previous study (Dunning, Lemasters, and Bhattacharya 2010). However, recall of falls is 16% underestimated and recall of all fall events is 30% overestimated in postpartum survey. There is a slight relationship between fall efficacy and true falls, but not between fall efficacy and fall recall. Our study suggests fall risk needs to be intermittently surveyed throughout pregnancy rather than assessed via postpartum survey.Practitioner summary: This study investigated the accuracy of postpartum survey of fall risk during pregnancy and the possibility of fall efficacy as a covariate. We used three corresponding surveys. We found inaccuracies in postpartum survey, not explain by fall efficacy.

Correlations between joint kinematics and dynamic balance control during gait in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic balance control degrades during pregnancy, but it is not yet understood why. Mechanical aspects of the body should directly affect walking balance control, but we have recently published papers indicating that weight gains during pregnancy explain very little dynamic balance changes. Our goal was to determine if lower extremity joint kinematic changes are an indicator of walking balance control. This information is vital to understanding the route by which pregnancy increases fall risk. METHODS: Twenty-three pregnant women were tested at five different times in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy. Participants performed walking trials at a self-selected pace. Motion capture was used to measure joint kinematics (discrete and coordination variables) and body center of mass motion. Changes over time were statistically analyzed. Correlations between kinematics and walking balance were modelled with hierarchical multiple regression models. RESULTS: As pregnancy progresses, it appears that a more flexed hip posture could be driving lower extremity kinematic changes toward increased coordination between joints and increased knee and ankle motions. Walking balance changes were also detected through increased COM motion (lateral range of motion and velocity) in the lateral directions. However, there was little correlation between kinematic and balance changes (r2 < 0.4). Strong correlations were only observed when all kinematics (including those that don't ubiquitously change during pregnancy) were used in the regression model (r2 > 0.7). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that walking balance control is not altered by a common kinematic change between all pregnant women. While increased lateral center of mass motion should be expected with pregnancy, the kinematics leading to this increase may be person-specific. The cause of dynamic imbalance in each pregnant women (physiological, mechanical, and neurocognitive) may play an important role in determining the kinematic means by which lateral center of mass motion increases.