Factors affecting primary care practitioners' alcohol-related discussions with older adults: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Risk of harm from drinking is heightened in later life, owing to age-related sensitivities to alcohol. Primary care services have a key role in supporting older people (aged ≥50 years) to make healthier decisions about alcohol. AIM: To examine primary care practitioners' perceptions of factors that promote and challenge their work to support older people in alcohol risk-reduction. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study consisting of semi-structured interviews and focus groups with primary care practitioners in Northern England. METHOD: Thirty-five practitioners (GPs, practice/district nurses, pharmacists, dentists, social care practitioners, and domiciliary carers) participated in eight interviews and five focus groups. Data were analysed thematically, applying principles of constant comparison. RESULTS: Practitioners highlighted particular sensitivities to discussing alcohol among older people, and reservations about older people's resistance to making changes in old age; given that drinking practices could be established, and promote socialisation and emotional wellbeing in later life. Age-related health issues increased older people's contact with practitioners, but management of older people's long-term conditions was prioritised over discussion of alcohol. Dedicated time to address alcohol in routine consultations with older people and training in alcohol intervention facilitated practitioners, particularly pharmacists and practice nurses. CONCLUSION: There are clear opportunities to support older people in primary care to make healthier decisions about alcohol. Dedicated time to address alcohol, training in identification of alcohol-related risks (particularly those associated with old age), and tailored interventions for older people, feasible to implement in practice settings, would help primary care practitioners to address older people's alcohol use.

Participant-reported Warfarin Adherence in Community-based Pediatric Patients.

Warfarin is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for children in the outpatient setting in Australia. Pediatric patients likely have different challenges to warfarin adherence compared with their adult counterparts; however, little is known about warfarin adherence among this population. This study aimed to understand warfarin adherence among community-based pediatric patients by using an online survey design. The survey instrument incorporated parent or patient self-reported warfarin doses missed in the preceding month, a validated warfarin adherence assessment tool, the 13-item Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication use Scale (SEAMS-13), and an open-ended question asking about the challenges of warfarin adherence. The indication of warfarin administration and patient's time in therapeutic range were obtained from medical records. The study recruited outpatients managed by a tertiary pediatric hospital who had previously consented to participate in warfarin research. In total, 53 families were contacted with 43 responses (81% response rate) and 41 completed surveys. The median age of the children from participating families was 10.6 years (range, 4.1 to 18.9 y). The majority of these children (n=42) used warfarin prophylactically and only 1 child used it to treat deep venous thrombosis. The time in therapeutic range achievement of this cohort was 64.4% (95% confidence interval, 58.7-70.2). The mean SEAMS-13 score was 33.5 (95% confidence interval, 31.75-35.37) and the total missed doses was 2.5%. Participants also identified barriers and enablers of warfarin adherence. This study was the first of its kind and thus it provides baseline data for future research. The warfarin adherence of this cohort was likely optimized because of frequent clinical contact and access to self-testing. Future studies are required to examine the different approaches aiming to improve the anticoagulant adherence after the emergence of direct oral anticoagulants with a wider therapeutic index and minimal monitoring that could contribute to less clinical contact.