Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1317-1323, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262961

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery has emerged as an operative tool for many elective and urgent surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early surgical trainees' experiences and opinions of robotic surgery. METHODS: An introductory robotic training course consisting of online da Vinci Xi/X training and in-person, hands on training was implemented for residents and medical students across surgical subspecialties at a single institution. A voluntary survey evaluating perceptions of and interest in robotic surgery and prior robotic surgery experience, as well as a basics of robotics quiz, was distributed to participants prior to the start of the in-person session. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the cohort. RESULTS: 85 trainees participated in the course between 2020 and 2023, including 58 first- and second-year surgical residents (general surgery, urology, OB/GYN, and thoracic surgery) and 27 fourth-year medical students. 9.4% of participants reported any formal robotic surgery training prior to the session, with only 19% of participants reporting robotic operative experience. 52% of the participants knew of and/or had completed the da Vinci online course modules prior to the scheduled training session. Participants unanimously (100%) agreed that robotic surgery should be implemented into surgical training. CONCLUSIONS: There is rising enthusiasm for robotic surgery, yet early exposure and training remain infrequent and inconsistent amongst medical students and new surgical residents. A standardized introduction of multi-disciplinary robotic surgery training should be incorporated into medical school and/or early residency education to ensure surgical residents receive appropriate exposure and training to achieve competency.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Humanos , Especialidades Cirúrgicas/educação , Feminino , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Currículo , Competência Clínica , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Adulto
2.
J Forensic Sci ; 50(6): 1426-9, 2005 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16382840

RESUMO

The development of less-lethal technologies has provided law enforcement personnel with an alternative to lethal force. Although the less lethal projectile was produced to engender non-penetrating wounds, case studies show that there have been a number of reported penetrating injuries ranging from minor to significant in morbidity. The objective of this study was to determine the energy per unit area required to penetrate various regions of the body. Eight unembalmed postmortem human specimens were procured for this testing. Each specimen sustained a maximum of 25 impacts consisting of shots to the anterior and posterior thorax, abdomen, and legs. A 12-gauge, fin-stabilized, rubber rocket round was used as the impactor for all of the conducted tests. The energy density required for 50% risk of penetration varied from 23.99 J/cm2 for the location on the anterior rib (p = 0.000) to 52.74 J/cm2 for the location on the posterior rib (p = 0.001).


Assuntos
Balística Forense , Pele/lesões , Pele/patologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/patologia , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cadáver , Feminino , Humanos , Cinética , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Borracha
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...