High-dose re-irradiation of intracranial lesions - Efficacy and safety including dosimetric analysis based on accumulated EQD2Gy dose EQD calculation.

INTRODUCTION: The use of cranial re-irradiation is growing with improving overall survival and the advent of high-precision radiotherapy techniques. Still the value of re-irradiation needs careful evaluation regarding safety and efficacy. We analyzed dosimetric and clinical data of patients receiving cranial re-irradiation using EQD2 sum plans. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 76 patients who received repeated cranial radiotherapy from 02/2013 to 09/2016. 34 patients suffered from recurrent primary brain tumors, 42 from brain metastases. Dosimetric analysis was performed accumulating EQD2 dose distributions based on rigid image registration. Clinical and radiological data was collected at follow-ups including toxicity, local control and overall survival. RESULTS: In total 76 patients had at least 2 courses of intracranial radiotherapy. The median accumulated prescription EQD2 dose was 96.5 Gy2 for all radiation courses combined. The median D(0.1 cc) of the brain for patients receiving more than 100 Gy2 was 114 Gy2 with a highest dose of 161.5 Gy2. 74% of patients suffered from low grade (G1-G2) acute toxicity, only two high grade (>G3) toxicities were recorded.Median overall survival from the time of first re-irradiation was 57 weeks (range 4-186 weeks). The median time to local failure for patients with a primary brain tumor was not reached and 24 weeks (range 1-77 weeks) for patients with brain metastases. CONCLUSION: Repeated radiotherapy appears both safe and efficient in patients with recurrent primary or secondary brain tumors with doses to the brain up to 120 Gy2 EQD2, doses below 100 Gy2 for brainstem and doses below 75 Gy2 EQD2 to chiasm and optic nerves.

Re-irradiation in the thorax - An analysis of efficacy and safety based on accumulated EQD2 doses.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic re-irradiation remains a challenge regarding the balance of local efficacy and acceptable toxicities. In this retrospective analysis we analyzed dosimetrical and clinical data of patients treated with thoracic re-irradiation based on accumulated EQD2Gy doses. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 42 consecutive single-institutional patients treated with repeated courses of thoracic radiotherapy from 12/2011 to 01/2017. Accumulated EQD2 dose distributions were calculated and dose parameters for organs at risk and target volumes were analysed. RESULTS: The median prescription dose was 42.2 Gy (10-70.6 Gy) for all RT courses. The median Dmean of both lungs was 10.1 Gy3 (range: 1.9 Gy3-17.9 Gy3) with a maximum D0.1 cc of 253.86 Gy3. The median D0.1 cc of the esophagus was 62.2 Gy3 with a maximum of 103.78 Gy3. The maximum D0.1 cc for the bronchial tree was 187.33 Gy3 (median 74.35 Gy3) and for the Aorta 216.1 Gy3 (median 70.9 Gy3). Median OS after first re-irradiation was 19 months (range 1-45 months). 12-month local control after a course of re-irradiation was 52.6%. 80% of patients suffered from a G1-G2 toxicity, most frequently coughing. One patient suffered from a G5 complication probably unrelated to re-irradiation. CONCLUSION: Even though several organs at risk received maximum accumulated doses of >100 Gy3, thoracic reirradiation resulted in an acceptable toxicity profile. Local tumor control and overall survival remained encouraging even after multiple courses of thoracic radiotherapy.

The synergistic effects of stimulants and parental psychotherapy in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

A 5-year-old boy presented with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), oppositional defiant disorder and separation anxiety disorder. The clinical assessment revealed longstanding parent-child relationship problems, ongoing family stress, and a chronic level of low grade depression in the mother. The treatment approach consisted of drug treatment of the child and long-term psychotherapy of the mother. At termination symptoms associated with ADHD were markedly reduced and parent-child relationship problems were no longer evident. It is argued that in a subgroup of children family stress and attachment difficulties may be involved in the development of ADHD. These difficulties should be considered separately in the treatment of children with ADHD, especially if still present after the symptomatic treatment. The treatment outcome raises the question whether or not certain symptoms attributed to ADHD may be reversible, and the long-term adverse outcome of the condition preventable.

A case of predominantly nocturnal soiling treated with amitriptyline.

The case of a 6 year old with soiling along with looseness of bowel and nocturnal soiling is reported. After failing to respond to conventional treatments, his symptoms remitted on a small dose of amitriptyline. Within the diversity of presentations of soiling, there may be a subgroup, not usually amenable to treatment, who can benefit from symptomatic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants.