Vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2 antibody response: the comparability of S1-specific binding assays depends on epitope and isotype discrimination.

Background: Quantification of the SARS-CoV-2-specific immune response by serological immunoassays is critical for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, neutralizing antibody titers to the viral spike (S) protein have been proposed as a correlate of protection (CoP). The WHO established the First International Standard (WHO IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (Ig) (NIBSC 20/136) to harmonize binding assays with the same antigen specificity by assigning the same unitage in binding antibody units (BAU)/ml. Method: In this study, we analyzed the S1-specific antibody response in a cohort of healthcare workers in Germany (n = 76) during a three-dose vaccination course over 8.5 months. Subjects received either heterologous or homologous prime-boost vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or three doses of BNT162b2. Antibodies were quantified using three anti-S1 binding assays (ELISA, ECLIA, and PETIA) harmonized to the WHO IS. Serum levels of neutralizing antibodies were determined using a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT). Binding assays were compared using Spearman's rank correlation and Passing-Bablok regression. Findings: All assays showed good correlation and similar antibody kinetics correlating with neutralizing potential. However, the assays show large proportional differences in BAU/ml. ECLIA and PETIA, which detect total antibodies against the receptor- binding domain (RBD) within the S1 subunit, interact similarly with the convalescent plasma-derived WHO IS but differently with vaccine serum, indicating a high sensitivity to the IgG/IgM/IgA ratio. Conclusion: All three binding assays allow monitoring of the antibody response in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals. However, the assay-specific differences hinder the definition of a common protective threshold in BAU/ml. Our results highlight the need for the thoughtful use of conversion factors and consideration of method-specific differences. To improve the management of future pandemics and harmonize total antibody assays, we should strive for reference material with a well-characterized Ig isotype composition.

Multicentre evaluation of a second generation point-of-care assay with an extended range for the determination of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.

BACKGROUND: In the second generation of the point-of-care (POC) assay Roche CARDIAC proBNP, the upper limit of the measuring range was extended from 3000 to 9000 ng/L. METHODS: A thirteen-site multicentre evaluation was carried out to assess the analytical performance of the POC NT-proBNP assay and to compare it with a laboratory N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) assay. RESULTS: In method comparisons of six lots of POC NT-proBNP with the lab reference method (Elecsys proBNP) mean bias ranged from -10 to +17%. In lot-to-lot comparisons all six investigated lots of POC NT-proBNP showed excellent agreement, with mean bias between -7% and +2%. The majority of all coefficients of variation obtained from ten-fold measurements using 56 native blood samples were below 8%. No interference was observed with hemolytic blood (hemoglobin concentrations up to 0.12 mmol/L), lipemic blood (triglyceride concentrations up to 14.0 mmol/L) nor icteric blood (bilirubin concentrations up to 63 micromol/L). Hematocrit values between 24% and 51% had no influence on the assay result. High NT-proBNP concentrations above the measuring range of POC NT-proBNP did not lead to false low results due to potential high-dose hook effect. Results with POC NT-proBNP were not influenced by different ambient temperatures (18 degrees C to 32 degrees C), the sample material used, nor by over- or underdosing by 15 microL compared to the regular sample volume of 150 microL. CONCLUSIONS: The POC NT-proBNP assay showed an excellent analytical performance including a good agreement with the laboratory method. The assay is therefore suitable for its intended use in point-of-care settings.