Design refinement and evaluation of a mobile manual standing wheelchair.

PURPOSE: There are no manually propelled wheelchairs on the market that are mobile in both seated and standing positions. In response to this product gap, our group formerly designed a mobile manual standing wheelchair (MMSW) and gathered stakeholder feedback. The purpose of this study was to refine the MMSW based on feedback, including weight and width reduction, and evaluate its performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MMSW was subjected to ANSI/RESNA stability testing, and three male participants completed a subset of the wheelchair skills test, including a 100-m roll test in the MMSW (seated and standing) and in their ultralight wheelchair. RESULTS: The MMSW met ANSI/RESNA stability safety standards. During the 100-m roll test, participants reached speeds with the MMSW in both the standing and sitting postures similar or greater than those typical of moving in the home environment (1.11 m/s seated; 0.79 m/s standing). Mobility speeds in the MMSW in the standing position were about three times faster than average walking speeds in exoskeletons (0.26 m/s exoskeletons). With the addition of chain drive bracing to the MMSW, one user was able to reach speeds in the standing position similar to average neurotypical walking speeds indicating the possibility for wheelchair users to be able to move in pace with family and friends. CONCLUSION: All participants expressed interest in the MMSW to facilitate improved quality of life. Further work is needed to test the utility of the MMSW in home and community settings, and its potential effects on standing time and health outcomes.Implications for rehabilitationManual standing wheelchairs with standing mobility may increase functional utility and length of standing time for manual wheelchair usersIncreased standing time may lead to several health benefits for manual wheelchair users.

Supine arm cycling during the post-flap recovery period for persons with spinal cord injuries: The multi-purpose arm cycle ergometer (M-PACE) safety and pilot testing.

OBJECTIVE: To describe how using a supine arm cycle ergometer can safely reduce deconditioning experienced by patients with spinal cord injury or disorder (SCI/D) during their four to six weeks of complete bed rest after surgery to close a stage 4 pressure injury. DESIGN: This pilot project used a newly designed arm cycle ergometer (known as the M-PACE) that extends over the bed, allowing a patient to lie completely supine while exercising. SETTING: The M-PACE was designed and built at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System (MVAHCS) and pilot tested at the MVAHCS SCI/D Center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with SCI/D, recovering from flap surgery and deemed appropriate to use the arm cycle ergometer were enrolled in the pilot study (n = 47). OUTCOME MEASURES: A pre-post six-minute arm test (6MAT), a proxy for conditioning, was conducted on a subset (n = 15) of participants before and after the supine cycling exercise training program. Participants' rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scores were collected at cessation of each 6MAT. Participants gave feedback on their perception of using the M-PACE. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: The 6MAT RPE was significantly reduced after training with the M-PACE while on bed rest (P = 0.003). Also, significantly more rotations were performed after completing the training program (P = 0.02). Further, study participants who accessed the M-PACE found using it helped offset the tedium of laying supine during flap surgery recovery. The differences in the 6MAT pre- to post measures indicate the M-PACE should be further studied for offsetting the normal deconditioning that occurs with extended bedrest.