Pediatric Residents' Perceptions of a Point-of-Care Ultrasound Collaboration With Emergency Medicine.

Background Pediatric residencies expanding their point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) education face barriers, including a lack of established curriculum and qualified educators. Prior studies report partnerships between pediatrics and pediatric emergency medicine (PEM); however, many non-PEM emergency medicine (EM) physicians with POCUS fellowship training also have experience with pediatric POCUS and represent an alternate educational partner. Objectives To improve pediatric residents' POCUS skills through collaborative education with EM and evaluate perceptions of the teaching format and instructors. Methods First through third-year pediatric residents attended a half-day didactic and hands-on session about renal, lung, and musculoskeletal (MSK) POCUS. These educational sessions were led by EM faculty with POCUS fellowship training and assisted by EM residents. Post-session surveys were administered to pediatric residents to assess prior POCUS experience, changes in confidence in acquiring and interpreting renal, lung, and MSK POCUS images, and opinions about the educational format. Statistical analyses of the post-session survey data were performed using SPSS. Results Thirty-nine pediatric residents attended the session and completed the survey of 45 total residents in the program (86.7%), with 89.7% completing 10 or fewer POCUS studies. Residents' comfort level with performing lung POCUS increased from 5.1% to 82.1% (p < .001), renal POCUS from 10.3% to 76.9% (p < .001), and MSK POCUS from 7.7% to 84.6% (p < .001). 87.2% rated the educational format as effective, and 94.9% (37/39) rated emergency medicine faculty as 'very effective' in providing ultrasound education relevant to the practice of pediatrics. Conclusion Pediatric resident POCUS education taught by EM faculty with POCUS fellowship training was well-received by pediatric residents and significantly improved confidence in acquiring and interpreting POCUS.

Prosecutor Preference for Forensic Nurse Testimony: Outcome of Expanding a Forensic Program.

INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate the impact of using forensic nurse examiners for patients with trauma on prosecutors' preference for testimony in criminal court. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a database of 562 subpoenas received from January 2012 to December 2017 was conducted for patients with trauma seen in a level 1 trauma center with a comprehensive forensic nursing program. RESULTS: The prosecutors' preferences in 453 of the 562 subpoenas received by the Forensic Nurse Examiners program involving a patient with trauma were analyzed. The prosecutors preferred the use of the forensic nurse examiner alone in 441 of the 453 cases (97.4%), with a decrease (100% to 2.7%) in preference for physicians testifying in criminal court after the expansion of our forensic nursing program compared with previous years before the program expansion. DISCUSSION: The quality of the expanded Forensic Nurse Examiner program was validated by an increased prosecutor preference for forensic nurse examiner testimony in criminal court as the program matured over the years.