Sensorimotor function and standing balance in older adults with transtibial limb loss.

BACKGROUND: Limited research has focused on older prosthesis users despite the expected compounded effects of age and amputation on sensorimotor function, balance, and falls. This study compared sensorimotor factors and standing balance between older individuals with and without transtibial amputation, hypothesizing that prosthesis users would demonstrate worse sensorimotor function. Secondarily we assessed the relationship between standing balance and somatosensation in prosthesis users. METHODS: Thirteen persons with unilateral transtibial amputation (71.7 years) and 10 able-bodied controls (71.7 years) participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Passive joint range-of-motion, muscle strength, proprioception (joint position sense), tactile sensitivity, and standing balance (center-of-pressure sway) were compared between groups. A multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between proprioception and balance (without vision) in prosthesis users. FINDINGS: Our hypotheses were generally not supported, with the only differences being reduced joint range-of-motion and strength in prosthesis users (with large effect sizes), but comparable sensation and balance. Notably, prosthesis users demonstrated better proprioception than controls as reflected through better joint position sense when the limb was non-weight bearing. Worse amputated limb proprioception was associated with better standing balance in prosthesis users. INTERPRETATION: Older prosthesis users have impaired passive joint motion and muscle strength compared to controls that could challenge their ability to position and control the amputated limb to avoid falls during daily activities. However, their better amputated limb proprioception might help counteract those limitations by leveraging sensory feedback from the suspended limb. The relationship between amputated limb proprioception and standing balance suggests a nuanced relationship that warrants further study.

Effects of footwear on the gait kinematics of women with unilateral transtibial amputation: an observational case series.

PURPOSE: Prosthesis geometry and behaviour limit the footwear options available to women. Using a commercially available prosthetic foot that permits user-alignment to accommodate shoes with different heel heights, we investigated the effect of footwear on gait kinematics, with and without adjustment for differences in heel-forefoot differential. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three women with transtibial amputation walked at a self-selected pace, first in an athletic shoe (prosthetist-aligned; baseline condition), then (i) in a flatter shoe without realigning the prosthesis, and (ii) in flat and heeled shoes following user re-alignment. Kinematics in each condition were compared to baseline. RESULTS: Baseline gait patterns were highly variable across participants. Gait was slower in comparison to baseline in all conditions, but movement compensations varied across participants. An increased lower limb extension tendency was evident with the misaligned prosthesis. With user re-alignment to accommodate the shoe there were fewer deviations from baseline, however kinematic differences remained in both the flat and heeled shoes. CONCLUSIONS: The user-alignment feature of the prosthetic foot reduced the effect of a change in footwear on kinematics, and permitted walking in heeled shoes when it might otherwise not be possible. Persistence of some deviations suggests differences in walking task demand remained despite adjustment.Implications for rehabilitationPermitting prosthesis users to don footwear of choice may improve body image, well-being and quality of life following amputation.Prosthetic feet that permit user ankle adjustment can reduce gait deviations associated with a change in footwear heel height, although kinematic adaptations are individual.

Comparison of range-of-motion and variability in upper body movements between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks.

BACKGROUND: Current upper limb prostheses do not replace the active degrees-of-freedom distal to the elbow inherent to intact physiology. Limited evidence suggests that transradial prosthesis users demonstrate shoulder and trunk movements to compensate for these missing volitional degrees-of-freedom. The purpose of this study was to enhance understanding of the effects of prosthesis use on motor performance by comparing the movement quality of upper body kinematics between transradial prosthesis users and able-bodied controls when executing goal-oriented tasks that reflect activities of daily living. METHODS: Upper body kinematics were collected on six able-bodied controls and seven myoelectric transradial prosthesis users during execution of goal-oriented tasks. Range-of-motion, absolute kinematic variability (standard deviation), and kinematic repeatability (adjusted coefficient-of-multiple-determination) were quantified for trunk motion in three planes, shoulder flexion/extension, shoulder ab/adduction, and elbow flexion/extension across five trials per task. Linear mixed models analysis assessed between-group differences and correlation analysis evaluated association between prosthesis experience and kinematic repeatability. RESULTS: Across tasks, prosthesis users demonstrated increased trunk motion in all three planes and shoulder abduction compared to controls (p ≤ 0.004). Absolute kinematic variability was greater for prosthesis users for all degrees-of-freedom irrespective of task, but was significant only for degrees-of-freedom that demonstrated increased range-of-motion (p ≤ 0.003). For degrees-of-freedom that did not display increased absolute variability for prosthesis users, able-bodied kinematics were characterized by significantly greater repeatability (p ≤ 0.015). Prosthesis experience had a strong positive relationship with average kinematic repeatability (r = 0.790, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: The use of shoulder and trunk movements by prosthesis users as compensatory motions to execute goal-oriented tasks demonstrates the flexibility and adaptability of the motor system. Increased variability in movement suggests that prosthesis users do not converge on a defined motor strategy to the same degree as able-bodied individuals. Kinematic repeatability may increase with prosthesis experience, or encourage continued device use, and future work is warranted to explore these relationships. As compensatory dynamics may be necessary to improve functionality of transradial prostheses, users may benefit from dedicated training that encourages optimization of these dynamics to facilitate execution of daily living activity, and fosters adaptable but reliable motor strategies.

The effects of walking speed and prosthetic ankle adapters on upper extremity dynamics and stability-related parameters in bilateral transtibial amputee gait.

Bilateral transtibial amputee (BTA) gait has been investigated less and is not as well understood compared to that of their unilateral counterparts. Relative to able-bodied individuals, BTAs walk with reduced self-selected speeds, increased step width, hip-hiking, and greater metabolic cost. The clinically observed upper body motions of these individuals have not been quantified, but appear substantially different from able-bodied ambulators and may impact upright balance. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the upper extremity kinematics of BTAs during steady-state walking. We measured medial-lateral ground reaction forces, step width and extrapolated center-of-mass (XCoM) trajectory, and observed effects of walking speed and increased prosthetic ankle range-of-motion (ROM) on these parameters. Significantly, BTAs display greater lateral trunk flexion ROM and shoulder abduction than able-bodied individuals when walking at similar speeds, and the inclusion of prosthetic adaptors for increasing passive ankle ROM slightly reduced step width. Overall, exaggerated lateral trunk flexion ROM was invariant with step width. Results suggest that lateral trunk motion is useful for shifting the body center-of-mass laterally onto the leading stance limb while simultaneously unloading the trailing limb. However, exaggerated lateral trunk flexion may introduce an unstable scenario if the XCoM is displaced beyond the lateral base-of-support. Further studies would be useful to identify if either prostheses that assist limb advancement and/or gait training may be effective in reducing this lateral sway while still maintaining efficient ambulation.

A kinematic model to assess spinal motion during walking.

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES: A 3-dimensional multi-segment kinematic spine model was developed for noninvasive analysis of spinal motion during walking. Preliminary data from able-bodied ambulators were collected and analyzed using the model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Neither the spine's role during walking nor the effect of surgical spinal stabilization on gait is fully understood. Typically, gait analysis models disregard the spine entirely or regard it as a single rigid structure. Data on regional spinal movements, in conjunction with lower limb data, associated with walking are scarce. METHODS: KinTrak software (Motion Analysis Corp., Santa Rosa, CA) was used to create a biomechanical model for analysis of 3-dimensional regional spinal movements. Measuring known angles from a mechanical model and comparing them to the calculated angles validated the kinematic model. Spine motion data were collected from 10 able-bodied adults walking at 5 self-selected speeds. These results were compared to data reported in the literature. RESULTS: The uniaxial angles measured on the mechanical model were within 5 degrees of the calculated kinematic model angles, and the coupled angles were within 2 degrees. Regional spine kinematics from able-bodied subjects calculated with this model compared well to data reported by other authors. CONCLUSIONS: A multi-segment kinematic spine model has been developed and validated for analysis of spinal motion during walking. By understanding the spine's role during ambulation and the cause-and-effect relationship between spine motion and lower limb motion, preoperative planning may be augmented to restore normal alignment and balance with minimal negative effects on walking.